Location of minimum foot clearance on the shoe and with respect to the obstacle changes with locomotor task.

Minimum foot clearance (MFC) as it relates to trips and falls has been extensively studied across many locomotor tasks, but examination of this body of research yields several studies with conflicting results and a wide range of MFCs within tasks. While there are several factors that may affect the MFC variability across studies (populations studied, environmental conditions, etc.), one aspect of the discrepancies in the literature may be the result of different placements of shoe markers and/or MFC calculation methods. A marker on the toe is often used, but may only quantify one aspect of how the foot actually clears the trip hazard. The purpose of this study was to determine the location on the shoe where MFC occurs during locomotor tasks with the highest risk of tripping. Ten young adults performed three trials of locomotor tasks which included overground walking, obstacle crossing, level change and stair negotiation. Clearance was calculated for 72 points on each shoe, including those most commonly used in past research. The location of the overall MFC on the shoe sole differed both between limbs and across locomotor tasks. Additionally, the region of the obstacle, step or stair over which the MFC occurred varied both within and across task. Use of this 3D MFC methodology provided further insight into which portions of the shoe may come closest to the tripping hazard. Future research should examine whether the location and value of the MFC changes between different populations, or with environmental modifications.

[1]  R. Begg,et al.  Minimum foot clearance during walking: strategies for the minimisation of trip-related falls. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[2]  A. Patla,et al.  Visual control of limb trajectory over obstacles during locomotion: effect of obstacle height and width , 1993 .

[3]  R. Barrett,et al.  A systematic review of the effect of ageing and falls history on minimum foot clearance characteristics during level walking. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[4]  T. Lockhart,et al.  Effects of age-related gait changes on the biomechanics of slips and falls , 2003, Ergonomics.

[5]  J. Wann,et al.  Stepping over obstacles: attention demands and aging. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[6]  F. Prince,et al.  Avoidance and accommodation of surface height changes by healthy, community-dwelling, young, and elderly men. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[7]  Lori Ann Vallis,et al.  Characteristics of single and double obstacle avoidance strategies: a comparison between adults and children , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Steven A Gard,et al.  Methodology for determining the sensitivity of swing leg toe clearance and leg length to swing leg joint angles during gait. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[9]  D. Winter Foot trajectory in human gait: a precise and multifactorial motor control task. , 1992, Physical therapy.

[10]  W. Sparrow,et al.  Gait characteristics of young and older individuals negotiating a raised surface: implications for the prevention of falls. , 2000, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[11]  J. Duysens,et al.  Exercise training can improve spatial characteristics of time-critical obstacle avoidance in elderly people. , 2008, Human Movement Science.

[12]  W. Berg,et al.  Stepping Performance During Obstacle Clearance in Women: Age Differences and the Association with Lower Extremity Strength in Older Women , 2000, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[13]  Ecosse Lamoureux,et al.  The effects of improved strength on obstacle negotiation in community-living older adults. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[14]  Rezaul Begg,et al.  Characteristics of gait in stepping over obstacles , 1996 .

[15]  S. Morrison,et al.  Toe clearance variability during walking in young and elderly men. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[16]  D. Elliott,et al.  Multifocal spectacles increase variability in toe clearance and risk of tripping in the elderly. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  L. Vallis,et al.  Age-related changes in avoidance strategies when negotiating single and multiple obstacles , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Peter R. Cavanagh,et al.  A three-dimensional approach to the calculation of foot clearance during locomotion , 1999 .

[19]  William E. Lee,et al.  The effects of everyday concurrent tasks on overground minimum toe clearance and gait parameters. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[20]  T. Lu,et al.  Comparisons of the lower limb kinematics between young and older adults when crossing obstacles of different heights. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[21]  D Howard,et al.  Effects of ramp negotiation, paving type and shoe sole geometry on toe clearance in young adults. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  David B Elliott,et al.  Falls in older people: effects of age and blurring vision on the dynamics of stepping. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  D. Winter,et al.  Strategies for recovery from a trip in early and late swing during human walking , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  Jill S Higginson,et al.  Foot clearance during stair descent: effects of age and illumination. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[25]  D. Elliott,et al.  Stepping up to a new level: effects of blurring vision in the elderly. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[26]  Marilyn Hartman,et al.  Characteristics of stepping over an obstacle in community dwelling older adults under dual-task conditions. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[27]  W. Berg,et al.  Circumstances and consequences of falls in independent community-dwelling older adults. , 1997, Age and ageing.

[28]  Brian W Schulz,et al.  Minimum toe clearance adaptations to floor surface irregularity and gait speed. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  R. Barrett,et al.  Swing phase mechanics of healthy young and elderly men. , 2001, Human movement science.

[30]  Louis F Draganich,et al.  The effects of walking speed on obstacle crossing in healthy young and healthy older adults. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  R W Bohannon,et al.  Kinematic analysis of obstacle clearance during locomotion. , 1999, Gait & posture.

[32]  L. Brown,et al.  Obstacle negotiation kinematics: age-dependent effects of postural threat. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[33]  K. Kaufman,et al.  Medio-lateral motion of the center of mass during obstacle crossing distinguishes elderly individuals with imbalance. , 2003, Gait & posture.