Failed Suppression of Salient Stimuli Precedes Behavioral Errors

Our visual system is constantly confronted with more information than it can process. To deal with the limited capacity, attention allows us to enhance relevant information and suppress irrelevant information. Particularly, the suppression of salient irrelevant stimuli has shown to be important as it prevents attention to be captured and thus attentional resources to be wasted. This study aimed at directly connecting failures to suppress distraction with a neural marker of suppression, the distractor positivity (Pd). We measured participants' EEG signal while they performed a visual search task in which they had to report a digit inside a shape target while ignoring distractors, one of which could be a salient color singleton. Reports of target digits served as a behavioral index of enhancement, and reports of color distractor digits served as a behavioral index of failed suppression, each measured against reports of neutral distractor digits serving as a baseline. Participants reported the target identity more often than any distractor identity. The singleton identity was reported least often, suggesting suppression of the singleton below baseline. Suppression of salient stimuli was absent in the beginning and then increased throughout the experiment. When the singleton identity was reported, the Pd was observed in a later time window, suggesting that behavioral errors were preceded by failed suppression. Our results provide evidence for the signal suppression hypothesis that states salient items have to be actively suppressed to avoid attentional capture. Our results also provide direct evidence that the Pd is reflecting such active suppression.

[1]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  Mental Rotation Requires Visual Short-term Memory: Evidence from Human Electric Cortical Activity , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  Anna Schubö,et al.  You see what you have learned. Evidence for an interrelation of associative learning and visual selective attention. , 2015, Psychophysiology.

[3]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Clayton Hickey,et al.  A temporal dependency account of attentional inhibition in oculomotor control , 2017, NeuroImage.

[5]  Stefan Pollmann,et al.  Cortical evidence for negative search templates , 2017 .

[6]  M. Eimer The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  John M. Gaspar,et al.  Suppression of Salient Objects Prevents Distraction in Visual Search , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method , 2005 .

[9]  David J. Prime,et al.  Inability to suppress salient distractors predicts low visual working memory capacity , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Geoffrey F Woodman,et al.  Serial deployment of attention during visual search. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Vincent Di Lollo,et al.  Electrophysiological Indices of Target and Distractor Processing in Visual Search , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  S. Luck,et al.  A Common Neural Mechanism for Preventing and Terminating the Allocation of Attention , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Dirk Kerzel,et al.  The distractor positivity (Pd) signals lowering of attentional priority: evidence from event-related potentials and individual differences. , 2014, Psychophysiology.

[14]  Agnieszka Wykowska,et al.  Irrelevant Singletons in Visual Search Do Not Capture Attention but Can Produce Nonspatial Filtering Costs , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Brett Bahle,et al.  Feature-Based Statistical Regularities of Distractors Modulate Attentional Capture , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  S J Luck,et al.  Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Attention selection, distractor suppression and N2pc , 2009, Cortex.

[18]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  Attentional selection and identification of visual objects are reflected by distinct electrophysiological responses , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  Nicholas Gaspelin,et al.  Inhibition as a potential resolution to the attentional capture debate. , 2019, Current opinion in psychology.

[20]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence of the Capture of Visual Attention , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  Edward Awh,et al.  Contralateral Delay Activity Indexes Working Memory Storage, Not the Current Focus of Spatial Attention , 2018, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  H. Müller,et al.  Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a “dimension-weighting” account , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  Suppression of overt attentional capture by salient-but-irrelevant color singletons , 2016, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[24]  Leonardo Chelazzi,et al.  Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering , 2017, Cortex.

[25]  Wieske van Zoest,et al.  Saccadic target selection as a function of time. , 2006, Spatial vision.

[26]  S. Luck,et al.  The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components , 2011 .

[27]  Hermann J. Müller,et al.  Attentional capture in visual search: Capture and post-capture dynamics revealed by EEG , 2017, NeuroImage.

[28]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity , 2004, Nature.

[29]  Clayton Hickey,et al.  Target resolution in visual search involves the direct suppression of distractors: evidence from electrophysiology. , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[30]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Attention Reshapes Center-Surround Receptive Field Structure in Macaque Cortical Area MT , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  Y. Tsal,et al.  White bear everywhere: Exploring the boundaries of the attentional white bear phenomenon , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[33]  Anna Schubö,et al.  Context homogeneity facilitates both distractor inhibition and target enhancement. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[34]  M. Carrasco Visual attention: The past 25 years , 2011, Vision Research.

[35]  R. Remington,et al.  Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Paul M Corballis,et al.  Event-related potentials reveal the effect of prior knowledge on competition for representation and attentional capture. , 2014, Psychophysiology.

[37]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  Combined Electrophysiological and Behavioral Evidence for the Suppression of Salient Distractors , 2018, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  J. Theeuwes Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[39]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[40]  Edward K Vogel,et al.  Neural Evidence for the Contribution of Active Suppression During Working Memory Filtering , 2019, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Statistical Regularities Modulate Attentional Capture , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[43]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  The role of stimulus-driven and goal-driven control in saccadic visual selection. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  Dominique Lamy,et al.  Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[46]  Carly J. Leonard,et al.  Direct Evidence for Active Suppression of Salient-but-Irrelevant Sensory Inputs , 2015, Psychological science.

[47]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 4.0: Current Progress With a Model of Visual Search , 2007, Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems.

[48]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Statistical regularities induce spatial as well as feature-specific suppression. , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Anticipatory distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search , 2019, bioRxiv.

[50]  Howard E Egeth,et al.  The ignoring paradox: Cueing distractor features leads first to selection, then to inhibition of to-be-ignored items , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[51]  Anders Petersen,et al.  Attentional Capture by Salient Distractors during Visual Search Is Determined by Temporal Task Demands , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  Anna Schubö,et al.  Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts. , 2016, Psychophysiology.

[53]  Jason T. Arita,et al.  Templates for rejection: configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  Anna Schubö,et al.  Cueing distraction: electrophysiological evidence for anticipatory active suppression of distractor location , 2019, Psychological Research.

[55]  Jeffrey D. Schall,et al.  Prefrontal Control of Visual Distraction , 2017, Current Biology.

[56]  Steven J Luck,et al.  Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: Electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[57]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.