An Integrated Flexible Aircraft Model for Optimization of Lift Distributions

This paper summarizes an integrated modelling approach for controlled flexible aircraft, applicable for flight loads and flight dynamics analyses. It is particularly suited when numerous repeated design analyses throughout the different design phases of an aircraft development need to be considered. An underrepresented aspect so far is the utilization of active control systems as design parameter already in the early design stages and not merely as mitigation strategy for emerging design deficiencies. An active control system can be beneficial for the reduction of structural weight by the use of load alleviation functions, as well as for improvement of the cruise performance and therefore reducing the fuel consumption. This achieved by appropriately optimizing the lift distribution for different use cases. Regarding the lift distributions with respect to loads analysis: the wing structural weight is driven mainly by the loads it has to sustain. One of the most important load conditions is the 2.5 g vertical pull up manoeuvre. A Manoeuvre Load Alleviation function shifts the center of lift inboard by deflection of the available control surfaces and hence reduces the wing root bending moment, which is in turn the primary driver for structural weight. Another very important load condition to be considered is the Discrete Tuned Gust, which might also be a critical case sizing the wing. An active gust load alleviation (GLA) system needs to redistribute the lift and damp out the structural modes excited by the gust by actively actuating the available control surfaces without introducing undesirable excitation of structural modes by the system itself. In the case of cruise performance, the induced drag depends on the spanwise lift distribution. Due to flexiblity, the wing shape changes during the mission. Active lift adaption by control surface deflections can help to reduce the induced drag. The focus of this paper is on assessing the applicability of the proposed modelling approach for the described use cases.

[1]  Raymond M. Kolonay,et al.  Optimal scheduling of control surfaces on flexible wings to reduce induced drag , 2006 .

[2]  H. D. Ramsey,et al.  Design maneuver loads for an airplane with an active control system , 1979 .

[3]  J B Malone,et al.  LANN (Lockheed, AFWAL, NASA-Langley, and NLR) Wing Test Program: Acquisition and Application of Unsteady Transonic Data for Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Computational Methods. , 1983 .

[4]  W. Rodden,et al.  A doublet-lattice method for calculating lift distributions on oscillating surfaces in subsonic flows. , 1969 .

[5]  Mark Johannes Verveld,et al.  A Reduced Order Model of Corrected Aerodynamic Influence Coefficients for Aircraft Loads Analysis , 2017 .

[6]  Thiemo Kier,et al.  An Integrated Modelling Approach for Flight Dynamics, Manoeuvre- and Gust-Loads Analysis , 2018 .

[7]  David K. Schmidt,et al.  Flight dynamics of aeroelastic vehicles , 1988 .

[8]  R. N. Desmarais,et al.  Interpolation using surface splines. , 1972 .

[9]  Sven G Hedman VORTEX LATTICE METHOD FOR CALCULATION OF QUASI STEADY STATE LOADINGS ON THIN ELASTIC WINGS IN SUBSONIC FLOW , 1966 .

[10]  William P. Rodden,et al.  Subsonic Steady and Oscillatory Aerodynamics for Multiple Interfering Wings and Bodies , 1972 .

[11]  Thiemo Kier,et al.  Integrated Flexible Dynamic Maneuver Loads Models based on Aerodynamic Influence Coefficients of a 3D Panel Method , 2015 .

[12]  T. Franz,et al.  Reduced-order models for aerodynamic applications, loads and MDO , 2018 .

[13]  Manuel Pusch Aeroelastic Mode Control using H2-optimal Blends for Inputs and Outputs , 2018 .

[14]  Jan Himisch,et al.  Winglet Shape and Load Optimization with a numerically supported Lifting Line Method , 2008 .