Combined use of T2‐weighted MRI and T1‐weighted dynamic contrast–enhanced MRI in the automated analysis of breast lesions

A multiparametric computer‐aided diagnosis scheme that combines information from T1‐weighted dynamic contrast–enhanced (DCE)‐MRI and T2‐weighted MRI was investigated using a database of 110 malignant and 86 benign breast lesions. Automatic lesion segmentation was performed, and three categories of lesion features (geometric, T1‐weighted DCE, and T2‐weighted) were automatically extracted. Stepwise feature selection was performed considering only geometric features, only T1‐weighted DCE features, only T2‐weighted features, and all features. Features were merged with Bayesian artificial neural networks, and diagnostic performance was evaluated by ROC analysis. With leave‐one‐lesion‐out cross‐validation, an area under the ROC curve value of 0.77 ± 0.03 was achieved with T2‐weighted‐only features, indicating high diagnostic value of information in T2‐weighted images. Area under the ROC curve values of 0.79 ± 0.03 and 0.80 ± 0.03 were obtained for geometric‐only features and T1‐weighted DCE‐only features, respectively. When all features were considered, an area under the ROC curve value of 0.85 ± 0.03 was achieved. We observed P values of 0.006, 0.023, and 0.0014 between the geometric‐only, T1‐weighted DCE‐only, and T2‐weighted‐only features and all features conditions, respectively. When ranked, the P values satisfied the Holm–Bonferroni multiple‐comparison test; thus, the improvement of multiparametric computer‐aided diagnosis was statistically significant. A computer‐aided diagnosis scheme that combines information from T1‐weighted DCE and T2‐weighted MRI may be advantageous over conventional T1‐weighted DCE‐MRI computer‐aided diagnosis. Magn Reson Med, 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  M Thelen,et al.  Improved artificial neural networks in prediction of malignancy of lesions in contrast-enhanced MR-mammography. , 2003, Medical physics.

[2]  M. Reiser,et al.  Cluster analysis of signal-intensity time course in dynamic breast MRI: does unsupervised vector quantization help to evaluate small mammographic lesions? , 2006, European Radiology.

[3]  Fred Godtliebsen,et al.  Feature extraction and classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted breast image data , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Maryellen L. Giger,et al.  Ideal observer approximation using Bayesian classification neural networks , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Li Lan,et al.  Classification of breast lesions with multimodality computer-aided diagnosis: observer study results on an independent clinical data set. , 2006, Radiology.

[6]  G. P. Krestin,et al.  Detection of breast cancer with conventional mammography and contrast-enhanced MR imaging , 1998, European Radiology.

[7]  L. Turnbull,et al.  Textural analysis of contrast‐enhanced MR images of the breast , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  A Horsman,et al.  Observer variability in the interpretation of contrast enhanced MRI of the breast. , 1996, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  Xavier Bargalló,et al.  Radiologic and pathologic findings in breast tumors with high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images. , 2010, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[10]  Maryellen L. Giger,et al.  A Fuzzy C-Means (FCM)-Based Approach for Computerized Segmentation of Breast Lesions in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Images1 , 2006 .

[11]  M. Giger,et al.  Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesions on contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance images , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  M. Giger,et al.  A fuzzy c-means (FCM)-based approach for computerized segmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[13]  C A Roe,et al.  Statistical Comparison of Two ROC-curve Estimates Obtained from Partially-paired Datasets , 1998, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[14]  C. Metz ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[15]  D. Ikeda,et al.  Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. , 2001, Radiology.

[16]  Karel G M Moons,et al.  Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. , 2008, Radiology.

[17]  C. Metz,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[18]  M. Giger,et al.  Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI. , 2006, Medical physics.

[19]  C. Piccoli,et al.  Contrast-enhanced breast MRI: factors affecting sensitivity and specificity , 1997, European Radiology.

[20]  M. Giger,et al.  Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM. , 2008, Medical physics.

[21]  M L Giger,et al.  Computerized analysis of breast lesions in three dimensions using dynamic magnetic-resonance imaging. , 1998, Medical physics.

[22]  L. Liberman,et al.  Observer variability and applicability of BI-RADS terminology for breast MR imaging: invasive carcinomas as focal masses. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[24]  K. Doi,et al.  Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications. , 2001, Radiology.

[25]  J O Barentsz,et al.  Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. , 1995, Radiology.

[26]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized interpretation of breast MRI: investigation of enhancement-variance dynamics. , 2004, Medical physics.

[27]  Charles E. Heckler,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 2005, Technometrics.

[28]  A. D. De Schepper,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment. , 2004, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[29]  M. Giger,et al.  Cancerous breast lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: computerized characterization for image-based prognostic markers. , 2010, Radiology.

[30]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Do T2‐weighted pulse sequences help with the differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions in dynamic breast MRI? , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.