Temporal versus spatial interpretation of cusp ion structures observed by two spacecraft

[1] A series of nearly simultaneous cusp crossings by the Polar and Fast Auroral Snapshot (FAST) spacecraft are used to investigate the development of cusp structures such as sudden changes in the energy of cusp precipitating ions. While such changes are generally interpreted as temporal signatures, recent investigations show evidence that such features can also be interpreted as spatial structures. Our analysis of four events during stable solar wind conditions confirms that cusp structures observed by one satellite are remarkably similar to cusp features observed up to several hours later by a second satellite. Using the spatial separation of the Polar and FAST spacecraft, the cusp features could also be traced over several hours in magnetic local time. These similarities led to the conclusion that large-scale cusp structures are spatial structures related to global ionospheric convection pattern set up by magnetic merging and not the result of temporal variations in reconnection parameters.

[1]  J. G. Watzin,et al.  An Overview of the Fast Auroral SnapshoT (FAST) Satellite , 2001 .

[2]  D. W. Curtis,et al.  The Electron and ion Plasma Experiment for Fast , 2001 .

[3]  T. Yeoman,et al.  Two-dimensional electric field measurements in the ionospheric footprint of a flux transfer event , 2000 .

[4]  Wolfgang Baumjohann,et al.  A survey of magnetopause FTEs and associated flow bursts in the polar ionosphere , 2000 .

[5]  J. Sauvaud,et al.  On spatial and temporal structures in the cusp , 1999 .

[6]  J. M. Ruohoniemi,et al.  Large-scale imaging of high-latitude convection with Super Dual Auroral Radar Network HF radar observations , 1998 .

[7]  T. Onsager,et al.  Modelling signatures of pulsed magnetopause reconnection in cusp ion dispersion signatures seen at middle altitudes , 1998 .

[8]  Raymond A. Greenwald,et al.  Statistical patterns of high‐latitude convection obtained from Goose Bay HF radar observations , 1996 .

[9]  M. Lockwood,et al.  On the longitudinal extent of magnetopause reconnection pulses , 1996 .

[10]  L. Blomberg,et al.  Altitudinal comparison of dayside field‐aligned current signatures by Viking and DMSP‐F7: Intermediate‐scale field‐aligned current systems , 1996 .

[11]  M. Lockwood.  The case for transient magnetopause reconnection , 1996 .

[12]  M. F. Smith,et al.  Earth's magnetospheric cusps , 1996 .

[13]  M. Lockwood,et al.  Location and characteristics of the reconnection X line deduced from low‐altitude satellite and ground‐based observations: 2. Defense Meteorological Satellite Program and European Incoherent Scatter data , 1995 .

[14]  T. Onsager,et al.  Low-altitude observations and modeling of quasi-steady magnetopause reconnection , 1995 .

[15]  H. Carlson,et al.  Flow-aligned jets in the magnetospheric cusp: Results from the Geospace Environment Modeling Pilot Program , 1995, Journal of Geophysical Research.

[16]  A. Mavretic,et al.  SWE, a comprehensive plasma instrument for the WIND spacecraft , 1995 .

[17]  B. A. Whalen,et al.  The Toroidal Imaging Mass-Angle Spectrograph (TIMAS) for the polar mission , 1995 .

[18]  T. B. Jones,et al.  DARN/SuperDARN , 1995 .

[19]  M. Smith,et al.  Low and middle altitude cusp particle signatures for general magnetopause reconnection rate variations: 1. Theory , 1994 .

[20]  M. Lockwood,et al.  Comment on “Mapping the dayside ionosphere to the magnetosphere according to particle precipitation characteristics” by Newell and Meng , 1993 .

[21]  R. Elphic,et al.  Well‐resolved observations by ISEE 2 of ion dispersion in the magnetospheric cusp , 1993 .

[22]  T. Onsager,et al.  Model of magnetosheath plasma in the magnetosphere: Cusp and mantle particles at low‐altitudes , 1993 .

[23]  M. Smith,et al.  The variation of reconnection rate at the dayside magnetopause and cusp ion precipitation , 1992 .

[24]  P. Anderson,et al.  Staircase ion signature in the polar cusp: A case study , 1992 .

[25]  M. Smith,et al.  The statistical cusp: a flux transfer event model , 1992 .

[26]  M. Freeman,et al.  The ionospheric signature of flux transfer events , 1991 .

[27]  C. Meng,et al.  Ion acceleration at the equatorward edge of the cusp: Low altitude observations of patchy merging , 1991 .

[28]  D. Klumpar,et al.  Ion Reflection and transmission during reconnection at the Earth's subsolar magnetopause , 1991 .

[29]  C. Russell,et al.  Cold ion beams in the low latitude boundary layer during accelerated flow events , 1990 .

[30]  M. Lockwood,et al.  Low-altitude signatures of the cusp and flux transfer events , 1989 .

[31]  R. Eather.  Polar cusp dynamics , 1985 .

[32]  C. Russell,et al.  Patterns of potential magnetic field merging sites on the dayside magnetopause , 1984 .

[33]  S. Cowley.  The causes of convection in the Earth's magnetosphere: A review of developments during the IMS , 1982 .

[34]  T. Hill,et al.  Solar wind plasma injection at the dayside magnetospheric cusp , 1977 .

[35]  E. Shelley,et al.  He ++ and H + Flux Measurements in the Day Side Cusp: Estimates of Convection El , 1976 .

[36]  H. Rosenbauer,et al.  Heos 2 plasma observations in the distant polar magnetosphere: The plasma mantle , 1975 .

[37]  J. Luhmann,et al.  Magnetopause merging site asymmetries , 1985 .