The impact of implementing a more restrictive prescription limit on Medicaid recipients. Effects on cost, therapy, and out-of-pocket expenditures.

On November 1, 1991, the Georgia Department of Medical Assistance reduced the maximum number of monthly reimbursable prescriptions from six to five. This policy change provided a natural experiment to investigate the recipient responses to a decrease in an existing prescription limit. The research design was a quasiexperimental, retrospective, 12-month interrupted time-series analysis of a cohort. The cohort consisted of 743 ambulatory recipients who were high prescription users. Complete Medicaid claims data were obtained, in addition to pharmacy-generated computer profiles for all cohort recipients to determine Medicaid and out-of-pocket prescriptions expenditures. Interrupted time-series analyses were performed to model the effect of the five-prescription limit on total, Medicaid-reimbursed, out-of-pocket, and prescription use across eight therapeutic categories. After the implementation of the five-prescription limit, total prescription use fell 6.6%, prescriptions reimbursed by Medicaid fell 9.9%, and prescriptions paid for out-of-pocket increased 9.7%. Abrupt, permanent decreases were observed for cardiovascular, miscellaneous, pulmonary, and palliative therapeutic drug categories (alpha = 0.05), whereas gastrointestinal, chemotherapy, hormone (insulin), and central nervous system prescription use remained constant. The implementation of a more restrictive prescription limit alters prescription regimens potentially predisposing elderly Medicaid recipients to clinical consequences. Further examination of the health outcomes of these recipients is necessary.

[1]  G. McEvoy,et al.  AHFS Drug Information , 1994 .

[2]  G. Wilensky From the Health Care Financing Administration. , 1991, JAMA.

[3]  S B Soumerai,et al.  Effects of Medicaid drug-payment limits on admission to hospitals and nursing homes. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  S B Soumerai,et al.  Withdrawing payment for nonscientific drug therapy. Intended and unexpected effects of a large-scale natural experiment. , 1990, JAMA.

[5]  L. R. Strandberg,et al.  Underutilization of Antihypertensive Drugs and Associated Hospitalization , 1989, Medical care.

[6]  W A Ray,et al.  Use of Medicaid data for pharmacoepidemiology. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[7]  D. Kreling,et al.  The Effects of an Internal Analgesic Formulary Restriction on Medicaid Drug Expenditures in Wisconsin , 1989, Medical care.

[8]  J. Avorn,et al.  Medicaid data as a resource for epidemiologic studies: strengths and limitations. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[9]  Stephen B. Soumerai,et al.  Payment Restrictions for Prescription Drugs under Medicaid , 1987 .

[10]  Robert H. Brook,et al.  Termination of Medi-Cal Benefits , 1986 .

[11]  Reed Ce,et al.  The differential impact of copayment on drug use in a Medicaid population. , 1985 .

[12]  W. Manning,et al.  The demand for prescription drugs as a function of cost-sharing. , 1985, Social science & medicine.

[13]  N. Lurie,et al.  Termination from Medi-Cal--does it affect health? , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  Alice Allen Ray SAS/ETS user's guide , 1982 .

[15]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Allocation of Resources to Manage Hypertension , 1977 .

[16]  R. Beck The Effects of Co-Payment on the Poor , 1974 .