Web-based learning: effects on learning process and outcome

Educators have witnessed lately a proliferation of Web-based learning applications. These Web-learning environments have made learning much more convenient by stretching the spatial and temporal barriers. Their effectiveness, however, remains to be examined. In this research, the authors study the relative effectiveness of two different types of Web-learning environments: distributed passive learning (DPL) versus distributed interactive learning (DEL) environments. In the DPL environment, the Web is only used to deliver linear learning material, such as Word files and PowerPoint slides. In the DIL environment, however, the learning material is in hypertext format, providing the learner with more exploration and interactivity capabilities. The results of an empirical study show that the DIL environment is superior to the DPL environment in terms of both the learning process and the learning outcome.

[1]  James E. McDonald,et al.  Hypertext perspectives: using pathfinder to build hypertext systems , 1990 .

[2]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  The Use of Information Technology to Enhance Management School Education: A Theoretical View , 1995, MIS Q..

[3]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  Improving student learning of conceptual information: GSS supported collaborative learning vs. individual constructive learning , 1997, Decis. Support Syst..

[4]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An Empirical Study of Computer System Learning: Comparison of Co-Discovery and Self-Discovery Methods , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Semantic Network Elicitation: Tools for Structuring Hypertext , 1989, UK Hypertext.

[6]  David H. Jonassen Semantic Networking as Cognitive Tools , 1992 .

[7]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Exploration environments: supporting users to learn groupware functions , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[8]  Ron Chi-Wai Kwok,et al.  Remote learning technologies: effectiveness of hypertext and GSS , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[9]  Jeff Conklin,et al.  Hypertext: An Introduction and Survey , 1987, Computer.

[10]  Shu-Sheng Liaw,et al.  Enhancing interactivity in web-based instruction: A review of the literature , 2000 .

[11]  B. Imrie Assessment for Learning: quality and taxonomies , 1995 .

[12]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Contextualized access to knowledge: theoretical perspectives and a process‐tracing study , 1998, Inf. Syst. J..

[13]  Kevin F. Collis,et al.  Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy , 1977 .

[14]  Ray McAleese Concepts as hypertext nodes: the ability to learn while navigating through hypertext nets , 1990 .

[15]  Greg Kearlsey Authoring considerations for hypertext , 1988 .

[16]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  Concept maps for engineering education: a cognitively motivated tool supporting varied assessment functions , 2000, IEEE Trans. Educ..

[17]  Sharon Dunwoody,et al.  Interactivity, Information Processing, and Learning on the World Wide Web , 2001 .

[18]  Chien Chou,et al.  Developing hypertext-based learning courseware for computer networks: the macro and micro stages , 1999 .

[19]  J. Wilson,et al.  Concept maps about chemical equilibrium and students' achievement scores , 1996 .

[20]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Research Commentary: Technology-Mediated Learning - A Call for Greater Depth and Breadth of Research , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..