Leaving fossil fuels behind? An innovation system analysis of low carbon cars

The automobile industry faces increasing demands from society to reduce emissions from road vehicles. The objective of this paper is to assess whether the EU automobile industry has an appropriate innovation structure for R&D in low carbon vehicles and the role that public R&D policy can play. The Sectoral System of Innovation approach is used to map the innovation system. Then, the functions of the Technological Innovation System (TIS) framework are used to explore the innovation processes in the system. The analysis has shown that there is an effective innovation system, which may soon move into a growth phase of large scale technology diffusion. There is now a concentration of industrial research efforts on battery and hybrid electric vehicles. Since technologies such as fuel cells and composite materials have potential benefits, public R&D support may be needed to ensure their development in a range of relevant firms in the EU.

[1]  C. E. Thomas,et al.  Fuel cell and battery electric vehicles compared , 2009 .

[2]  M. Sheller.  Automotive Emotions , 2004 .

[3]  Remco Hoogma,et al.  Beyond national and technological styles of innovation diffusion: a dynamic perspective on cases from the energy and transport sectors , 1998 .

[4]  Tobias Wiesenthal,et al.  Mapping innovation in the European transport sector. An assessment of R&D efforts and priorities, institutional capacities, drivers and barriers to innovation , 2011 .

[5]  P. Vergragt,et al.  Sustainable mobility: from technological innovation to societal learning , 2007 .

[6]  Giampaolo Manzolini,et al.  Energy analysis of electric vehicles using batteries or fuel cells through well-to-wheel driving cycle simulations , 2009 .

[7]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  A transitions model for sustainable mobility , 2009 .

[8]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Comparing systems approaches to innovation and technological change for sustainable and competitive economies: an explorative study into conceptual commonalities, differences and complementarities , 2010 .

[9]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change , 2007 .

[10]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  Infrastructure investment for a transition to hydrogen automobiles , 2010 .

[11]  Nigel P. Brandon,et al.  Comparative analysis of battery electric, hydrogen fuel cell and hybrid vehicles in a future sustainable road transport system , 2010 .

[12]  Max Åhman,et al.  Government policy and the development of electric vehicles in Japan , 2006 .

[13]  B. Carlsson,et al.  On the nature, function and composition of technological systems , 1991 .

[14]  Peter Erskine Wells,et al.  U-turn: the rise and demise of the automobile industry , 2007 .

[15]  Maïder Saint Jean,et al.  Sectoral systems of environmental innovation: An application to the French automotive industry , 2009 .

[16]  J. Kohler,et al.  Transport and the environment: the need for policy for long-term radical change , 2006 .

[17]  Lester B. Lave,et al.  Implementing technology-forcing policies: The 1970 Clean Air Act Amendments and the introduction of advanced automotive emissions controls in the United States , 2005 .

[18]  Paul Andre Henri Francois Nieuwenhuis,et al.  The automotive industry: a guide , 2001 .

[19]  G. Leduc,et al.  Bottom-up estimation of industrial and public R&D investment by technology in support of policy-making: the case of selected low-carbon energy technologies , 2012 .

[20]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  Climate change and cars in the EU: the roles of auto firms, consumers, and policy in responding to global environmental change , 2010 .

[21]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Understanding the formative stage of technological innovation system development: The case of natural gas as an automotive fuel , 2010 .

[22]  Vanessa Oltra,et al.  Variety of technological trajectories in low emission vehicles (LEVs) : a patent data analysis. , 2006 .