Measuring the Benefits of Transport Safety

Two inescapable facts confront those concerned to determine the appropriate level of provision of safety on any particular transport mode. First, safety is typically not a free good, and second, society’s resources are not limitless. This means that a responsible decision for or against any proposed transport safety improvement will require a judgement as to whether or not the reduction in risk afforded by the improvement is large enough to justify its cost of provision. This then raises the question of how such a judgement might be made. At the intuitive level, most of us would no doubt agree that a safety improvement which would cost just a few thousand pounds, and which could be expected to prevent several fatalities, would be well-warranted. Equally, most people would have little hesitation in deciding against a proposal that would cost several millions of pounds but which would, at best, prevent only one or two minor injuries. In less extreme cases, however, matters are not quite so straightforward.

[1]  Graham Loomes,et al.  Towards a Willingness-To-Pay Based Value of Underground Safety , 1994 .

[2]  R Hope RATIONAL SPENDING ON SAFETY BRINGS RESULTS , 1992 .

[3]  Graham Loomes,et al.  THE VALUE OF PREVENTING NON-FATAL ROAD INJURIES: FINDINGS OF A WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY NATIONAL SAMPLE SURVEY , 1993 .

[4]  A. Marin,et al.  The Reward for Risk in the Labor Market: Evidence from the United Kingdom and a Reconciliation with Other Studies , 1982, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  M. Hammerton,et al.  THE VALUE OF SAFETY: RESULTS OF A NATIONAL SAMPLE SURVEY. IN: URBAN TRANSPORT , 1985 .

[6]  T R Miller,et al.  CRASH COSTS AND SAFETY INVESTMENT. ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF AUTOMOTIVE MEDICINE. PROCEEDINGS 32ND ANNUAL CONFERENCE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, SEPTEMBER 12-14, 1988 , 1988 .

[7]  L. Needleman Valuing other people's lives. , 1976, The Manchester school of economic and social studies.

[8]  Ulf Persson,et al.  The value of risk reduction: results of a swedish sample survey. , 1991 .

[9]  Michael Jones-Lee,et al.  The Economics Of Safety And Physical Risk , 1991 .

[10]  Glenn C. Blomquist,et al.  Value of Life Saving: Implications of Consumption Activity , 1979, Journal of Political Economy.

[11]  E. Mishan Evaluation of Life and Limb: A Theoretical Approach , 1971, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  W. Viscusi,et al.  Altruistic and private valuations of risk reduction , 1988 .

[13]  W. Seal,et al.  Optimal Motorway Speed and Some Valuations of Time and Life , 1975 .

[14]  T R Miller,et al.  Crash costs and safety investment. , 1989, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Michael Jones-Lee,et al.  The Value of Transport Safety , 1990 .

[16]  Lan Savage,et al.  An empirical investigation into the effect of psychological perceptions on the willingness-to-pay to reduce risk , 1993 .

[17]  Michael W. Jones-Lee,et al.  THE VALUE OF TRANSPORT SAFETY: RESULTS OF A NATIONAL SAMPLE SURVEY , 1987 .

[18]  D. Fennell INVESTIGATION INTO THE KING'S CROSS UNDERGROUND FIRE , 1988 .

[19]  M Hammerton,et al.  THE CONSISTENCY AND COHERENCE OF ATTITUDES TO PHYSICAL RISK , 1982 .

[20]  D. Silcock Traffic accidents: procedures adopted in various countries for estimating their costs or valuing their prevention , 1982 .

[21]  Michael Jones-Lee,et al.  The value of life: An economic analysis , 1976 .

[22]  Gunther Maier,et al.  The economics of traffic accidents on Austrian roads: Risk lovers or policy deficit? , 1989 .