Global agriculture R&D and the changing aid architecture

Agriculture research knowledge and technology that transcends national borders has played a crucial role in enhancing developing country productivity growth over the past 50 years. The demand for international agriculture research (IAR) continues to be strong today even while becoming increasingly differentiated by the stage of development that a particular country or region is in. The supply of IAR to developing country research programs is, however, becoming increasingly constrained by: variable donor support; a push toward downstream product adaptation and dissemination activities relative to innovation and product development; and a lack of clear links between international public good research and national agriculture development priorities. Country-level donor coordination and alignment mechanisms, specified in the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness, do not explicitly account for the role of IAR in the development process. While the movement toward national ownership of its development agenda and donor alignment around it is unquestionably good, an unintended consequence could be a break in the R&D pipeline that supplies public good research and technologies for enhancing developing country agriculture productivity growth. The article presents options for rebuilding synergies between international public good research and national agriculture development priorities. Copyright (c) 2010 International Association of Agricultural Economists. (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

[1]  Philippe Le Houérou,et al.  Aid architecture : an overview of the main trends in official development assistance flows , 2008 .

[2]  B. Beattie Science Under Scarcity: Principles and Practice for Agricultural Research Evaluation and Priority Setting , 1995 .

[3]  Robert E. Evenson,et al.  Economic impacts of agricultural research and extension , 2001 .

[4]  Louise Sperling,et al.  Rethinking the Farmer's Role in Plant Breeding: Local Bean Experts and On-station Selection in Rwanda , 1993, Experimental Agriculture.

[5]  Prabhu Pingali,et al.  Changing locus of agricultural research: will the poor benefit from biotechnology and privatization trends? , 2002 .

[6]  H. Binswanger-Mkhize,et al.  The Changing Context and Prospects for Agricultural and Rural Development in Africa , 2010 .

[7]  Julian M. Alston,et al.  The role of technology spillovers and economies of size in the efficient design of agricultural research systems. , 2001 .

[8]  David A. Raitzer,et al.  Benefit-cost meta-analysis of investment in the International Agricultural Research Centers of the CGIAR , 2008 .

[9]  P. Pardey,et al.  Research returns redux: a meta-analysis of the returns to agricultural R&D , 2000 .

[10]  H. Groote,et al.  Socio-economic impact of biological control of mango mealybug in Benin , 2002 .

[11]  Ian Scoones,et al.  Global engagements with global assessments : the case of the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD) , 2008 .

[12]  H. Herren,et al.  Economics of biological control of cassava mealybug in Africa , 2000 .

[13]  P. Pingali,et al.  The Role of International Agricultural Research in Contributing to Global Food Security and Poverty Alleviation: The case of the CGIAR , 2007 .

[14]  P. Pingali Milestones in impact assessment research in the CGIAR, 1970-1999 , 1999 .

[15]  S. Rozelle,et al.  The Farmer's Voice in Priority Setting: A Cross‐Country Experiment in Eliciting Technological Preferences* , 2001, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[16]  Uma Lele Global Food and Agricultural Institutions: The Cosmology of International Development Assistance , 2009 .