Commuting to School: A New Spatial Interaction Modelling Framework for the Education Sector

The education sector in England and Wales is becoming increasingly data rich, with the regular collection of the Pupil Level Annual School Census (PLASC) and school preference information, together with the compilation of school performance league tables. However, it is also a rapidly changing environment both in terms of demographic demand as well as policy responses from Government. The latest policy documents require that local education authorities provide fair and equitable admissions policies for all, while at the same time limiting the number of surplus school places. Moreover, funding has to be targeted appropriately in the face of significant changes in the complexion and number of state educated school pupils. Therefore, it is crucial for education planners to be able to interpret the large quantities of data collected each year into valuable intelligence to support planning and decision making. This chapter explores the use of classic spatial interaction models with journey to school data for the purpose of school network planning for the city of Leeds. The limitations associated with the application of spatial interaction models in the education sector will be discussed, and modifications to the computational form will be explored using a genetic algorithm. Spatial interaction models representing pupils from different socio-demographic backgrounds will be calibrated and incorporated into an overarching logic model called the Spatial Education Model (SEM). Finally, the SEM will be used to forecast pupil numbers attending schools in the study area up to the year 2013. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61520-755-8.ch016

[1]  S. Gorard Comments on ‘Modelling social segregation’ by Goldstein and Noden , 2004 .

[2]  S. Stouffer Intervening opportunities: a theory relating mobility and distance , 1940 .

[3]  S. Gorard 'Well. That about wraps it up for school choice research': A state of the art review , 1999 .

[4]  M. Senior From gravity modelling to entropy maximizing , 1979 .

[5]  Patrick S. McCarthy,et al.  A Study of the Importance of Generalized Attributes in Shopping Choice Behaviour , 1980 .

[6]  James A. Pooler,et al.  An extended family of spatial interaction models , 1994 .

[7]  Simon Burgess,et al.  School and Residential Ethnic Segregation: An Analysis of Variations across England's Local Education Authorities , 2006 .

[8]  Ron Johnston,et al.  Primary Schools, Markets and Choice: Studying Polarization and the Core Catchment Areas of Schools , 2008 .

[9]  A S Fotheringham,et al.  A New Set of Spatial-Interaction Models: The Theory of Competing Destinations † , 1983 .

[10]  S. Asthana,et al.  Local Markets and the Polarization of Public‐Sector Schools in England and Wales , 2000 .

[11]  Sheena Asthana,et al.  What's in a number? Commentary on Gorard and Fitz's ‘Investigating the determinants of segregation between schools’ , 2000 .

[12]  Simon Burgess,et al.  School Segregation in Multiethnic England , 2004 .

[13]  David L. Huff A Note on the Limitations of Intraurban Gravity Models , 1962 .

[14]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Modelling the Effects of Shopping Centre Size and Store Variety on Consumer Choice Behaviour , 1997 .

[15]  S. Gorard Here we go again: a reply to ‘What's in a number?’ by Gibson and Asthana , 2000 .

[16]  Brian Chalkley,et al.  School Catchments and Pupil Movements: A case study in parental choice , 2000 .

[17]  Dianne Gereluk,et al.  COMMUNITIES IN A CHANGING EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT , 2005 .

[18]  Feyisa Demie Pupil mobility and educational achievement in schools: an empirical analysis , 2002 .

[19]  Alan Wilson,et al.  A statistical theory of spatial distribution models , 1967 .

[20]  Simon Burgess,et al.  England's Multiethnic Educational System? A Classification of Secondary Schools , 2005 .

[21]  G Diplock,et al.  Building New Spatial Interaction Models by Using Genetic Programming and a Supercomputer , 1998 .

[22]  Alan Wilson,et al.  A Family of Spatial Interaction Models, and Associated Developments , 1971 .

[23]  Daniel C. Knudsen,et al.  Matrix Comparison, Goodness-of-Fit, and Spatial Interaction Modeling , 1986 .

[24]  Hércules Antonio do Prado,et al.  Computational Methods for Agricultural Research: Advances and Applications , 2010 .

[25]  A. Fotheringham,et al.  Chain Image and Store-Choice Modeling: The Effects of Income and Race , 1993 .

[26]  J. Thill,et al.  Spatial interaction modelling , 2003 .

[27]  Stan Openshaw,et al.  Neural Network, Genetic, and Fuzzy Logic Models of Spatial Interaction , 1998 .

[28]  C. Pooley,et al.  The journey to school in Britain since the 1940s: continuity and change , 2005 .