Choice Modeling New Zealand High School Seniors' Preferences for University Education

ABSTRACT Preferences for college education among year 12 and 13 high school seniors from throughout New Zealand were surveyed. Initial focus group researched students in the process of deciding on college education and/or on a particular college or university institution in their choice process. Quantitative research developed from the focus group responses and based on a stated preferences (choice) survey of school students (n = 526) followed. Students' preferences regarding university choice were predominantly influenced by the quality and flexibility of the degree and/or course options, likelihood that employers will recruit from the university, the extent that university accommodation is subsidized and the overall cost of attending the university positioned in comparison to other universities. Secondary students would prefer not to attend a university with access restricted to an “A” bursary examination mark (bursary is a New Zealand pre-college examination to gain fee subsidy), that has limited first year accommodation, or which offers sports scholarships. New Zealand secondary school students are relatively price insensitive, with the cost of attending university not perceived as a deterrent. Moreover, the research findings show a positive cost-value relationship exists in students' choice preferences. Students would prefer to attend a university where the cost was equal to or higher than other options.

[1]  Patricia J. Gumport.  In Search of Strategic Perspective: A Tool for Mapping the Market in Postsecondary Education , 1997 .

[2]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior , 1959 .

[3]  Chris Martin.  Institutional Research and Student Recruitment or How Do Institutions of Higher Education Know What Attracts Students to Their Doors? Market Research Can Help. AIR 1996 Annual Forum Paper. , 1996 .

[5]  R. Javalgi,et al.  Analysis of Students' Needs in Selecting a College or University in a Changing Environment , 1995 .

[6]  J. Louviere,et al.  Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities , 1994 .

[7]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Analyzing Decision Making , 1988 .

[8]  J. March.  Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice , 1978 .

[9]  M. Lockwood,et al.  Stated preference surveys of remnant native vegetation conservation , 1999 .

[10]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Constructive Consumer Choice Processes , 1998 .

[11]  J. S. Hunter,et al.  The 2 k—p Fractional Factorial Designs Part I , 2000, Technometrics.

[12]  K. Gallagher,et al.  Studying Student College Choice: A Three-Phase Model and the Implications for Policymakers. , 1987 .

[13]  K. Lancaster.  A New Approach to Consumer Theory , 1966, Journal of Political Economy.

[14]  G. Soutar,et al.  Students’ preferences for university: a conjoint analysis , 2002 .

[15]  P. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook , 1978 .

[16]  E. Rowland.  Theory of Games and Economic Behavior , 1946, Nature.

[17]  Donald E. Heller.  Student Price Response in Higher Education: An Update to Leslie and Brinkman , 1997 .

[18]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Analyzing Decision Making: Metric Conjoint Analysis , 1988 .

[19]  S. Baron,et al.  An analysis of student characteristics within the student decision making process , 2003 .

[20]  J. S. Hunter,et al.  The 2 k — p Fractional Factorial Designs , 1961 .

[21]  Jeffrey Bennett,et al.  Choice Modelling, Non-Use Values and Benefit Transfer , 2000 .

[22]  J. Lusk,et al.  Recruiting Agricultural Economics Graduate Students: Student Demand for Program Attributes , 2004 .

[23]  Charles D. Barrett.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[24]  Ruth E. Kallio.  Factors influencing the college choice decisions of graduate students , 1995 .

[25]  N. Anderson.  Functional measurement and psychophysical judgment. , 1970, Psychological review.

[26]  L. Thurstone.  A law of comparative judgment. , 1994 .

[27]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  Research on Judgment and Decision Making , 1997 .

[28]  Daniel L. Rubinfeld,et al.  Contingent Valuation and Revealed Preference Methodologies : Comparing the Estimates for Quasi-Public Goods , 1997 .

[29]  Wolfgang Haider,et al.  A model of tourist choices of hypothetical Caribbean destinations , 1990 .

[30]  S. M. Lewis,et al.  Orthogonal Fractional Factorial Designs , 1986 .

[31]  C. Nachtsheim.  Orthogonal Fractional Factorial Designs , 1985 .

[32]  K. Lancaster,et al.  Consumer Demand. A New Approach. , 1972 .

[33]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Applied discrete-choice modelling , 1980 .

[34]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[35]  Jack Schmit,et al.  An empirical look at the search stag& of the student college choice process , 2007 .

[36]  James C. Hearn,et al.  The Structure of College Choice. , 1984 .

[37]  R. Luce,et al.  Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement , 1964 .

[38]  D. G. Labay,et al.  Repositioning Colleges Using Changing Student Quality Perceptions: An Exploratory Analysis , 1997 .

[39]  M. Randall.  Survey of College Plans of Maryland High Ability Students. , 1999 .

[40]  S. Addelman.  Orthogonal Main-Effect Plans for Asymmetrical Factorial Experiments , 1962 .

[41]  K. Galotti,et al.  Adolescents' experience of a life-framing decision , 1996 .

[42]  T. Flint.  Parental and planning influences on the formation of student college choice sets , 1992 .

[43]  K. Galotti,et al.  How do high school students structure an important life decision? A short-term longitudinal study of the college decision-making process , 1994 .