Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer

Abstract Adhesively-bonded joints are extensively used in several fields of engineering. Cohesive Zone Models (CZM) have been used for the strength prediction of adhesive joints, as an add-in to Finite Element (FE) analyses that allows simulation of damage growth, by consideration of energetic principles. A useful feature of CZM is that different shapes can be developed for the cohesive laws, depending on the nature of the material or interface to be simulated, allowing an accurate strength prediction. This work studies the influence of the CZM shape (triangular, exponential or trapezoidal) used to model a thin adhesive layer in single-lap adhesive joints, for an estimation of its influence on the strength prediction under different material conditions. By performing this study, guidelines are provided on the possibility to use a CZM shape that may not be the most suited for a particular adhesive, but that may be more straightforward to use/implement and have less convergence problems (e.g. triangular shaped CZM), thus attaining the solution faster. The overall results showed that joints bonded with ductile adhesives are highly influenced by the CZM shape, and that the trapezoidal shape fits best the experimental data. Moreover, the smaller is the overlap length ( L O ), the greater is the influence of the CZM shape. On the other hand, the influence of the CZM shape can be neglected when using brittle adhesives, without compromising too much the accuracy of the strength predictions.

[1]  J. Morais,et al.  Fracture behaviour of damaged wood beams repaired with an adhesively-bonded composite patch , 2009 .

[2]  J. Comyn,et al.  Structural Adhesive Joints in Engineering , 1984, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[3]  Magd Abdel Wahab,et al.  Damage modelling of adhesively bonded joints , 2006 .

[4]  U. Stigh,et al.  Influence of Layer Thickness on Cohesive Properties of an Epoxy-Based Adhesive—An Experimental Study , 2010 .

[5]  N. Chandra,et al.  Some issues in the application of cohesive zone models for metal–ceramic interfaces , 2002 .

[6]  Raul D.S.G. Campilho,et al.  Advances in Numerical Modelling of Adhesive Joints , 2012 .

[7]  De Xie,et al.  Discrete Cohesive Zone Model to Simulate Static Fracture in 2D Triaxially Braided Carbon Fiber Composites , 2006 .

[8]  S. K. Panigrahi,et al.  Adhesion failure propagation in adhesively-bonded single-lap laminated FRP composite joints , 2007 .

[9]  John Morton,et al.  An evaluation of analytical and numerical solutions to the single-lap joint , 1994 .

[10]  R. Frias,et al.  Buckling strength of adhesively-bonded single and double-strap repairs on carbon-epoxy structures , 2009 .

[11]  M. Banea,et al.  Strength Improvement of Adhesively-Bonded Joints Using a Reverse-Bent Geometry , 2011 .

[12]  A. Waas,et al.  Mixed-mode cohesive-zone models for fracture of an adhesively bonded polymer–matrix composite , 2006 .

[13]  L.F.M. da Silva,et al.  Strength prediction of single- and double-lap joints by standard and extended finite element modelling , 2011 .

[14]  Henrik Myhre Jensen,et al.  Cohesive zone modelling of interface fracture near flaws in adhesive joints , 2004 .

[15]  M. D. Thouless,et al.  Numerical simulations of adhesively-bonded beams failing with extensive plastic deformation , 1999 .

[16]  Computational Modelling of the Residual Strength of Repaired Composite Laminates Using a Cohesive Damage Model , 2008 .

[17]  M. D. Thouless,et al.  The effects of geometry and material properties on the fracture of single lap-shear joints , 2002 .

[18]  G. R. Wooley,et al.  Stress Concentration Factors for Bonded Lap Joints , 1971 .

[19]  Jiye Chen,et al.  Predicting Progressive Delamination of Stiffened Fibre-Composite Panel and Repaired Sandwich Panel by Decohesion Models , 2002 .

[20]  Lucas F. M. da Silvaa,et al.  Alternative Methods to Measure the Adhesive Shear Displacement in the Thick Adherend Shear Test , 2008 .

[21]  Alberto Corigliano,et al.  Modeling and simulation of crack propagation in mixed-modes interlaminar fracture specimens , 1996 .

[22]  M. D. Thouless,et al.  Use of a cohesive-zone model to analyze the fracture of a fiber-reinforced polymer-matrix composite , 2005 .

[23]  Ulf Stigh,et al.  An explicit FE-model of impact fracture in an adhesive joint , 2007 .

[24]  D. Bond,et al.  Principles and practices of adhesive bonded structural joints and repairs , 1999 .

[26]  Constantinos Soutis,et al.  Strength prediction of patch-repaired CFRP laminates loaded in compression , 2000 .

[27]  M. Banea,et al.  Modelling of Single-Lap Joints Using Cohesive Zone Models: Effect of the Cohesive Parameters on the Output of the Simulations , 2012 .

[28]  M. Banea,et al.  Temperature Dependence of the Fracture Toughness of Adhesively Bonded Joints , 2010 .

[29]  J. Morais,et al.  Buckling Behaviour of Carbon–Epoxy Adhesively-Bonded Scarf Repairs , 2009 .

[30]  Guoqiang Li,et al.  Effects of adhesive thickness on global and local Mode-I interfacial fracture of bonded joints , 2010 .

[31]  L. Silva,et al.  Parametric study of adhesive joints with composites , 2012 .

[32]  Pedro P. Camanho,et al.  An engineering solution for mesh size effects in the simulation of delamination using cohesive zone models , 2007 .

[33]  David A. Dillard,et al.  The cracked lap shear specimen revisited—a closed form solution , 1996 .

[34]  Vincent B. C. Tan,et al.  Traction–separation laws for progressive failure of bonded scarf repair of composite panel , 2011 .

[35]  J. Morais,et al.  Modelling the tensile fracture behaviour of CFRP scarf repairs , 2009 .

[36]  L.F.M. da Silva,et al.  Adhesively bonded joints in composite materials: An overview , 2009 .

[37]  M. Crisfield,et al.  Finite element interface models for the delamination analysis of laminated composites: mechanical and computational issues , 2001 .

[38]  Min Jung Lee,et al.  Determination of cohesive parameters for a mixed-mode cohesive zone model , 2010 .

[39]  A. Biel,et al.  Effects of constitutive parameters on the accuracy of measured fracture energy using the DCB-specimen , 2008 .

[40]  G. Alfano.  On the influence of the shape of the interface law on the application of cohesive-zone models , 2006 .

[41]  J. Williams,et al.  Measurement of cohesive zone parameters in tough polyethylene , 2000 .

[42]  Mariana D. Banea,et al.  eXtended Finite Element Method for fracture characterization of adhesive joints in pure mode I , 2011 .

[43]  M. D. de Moura,et al.  Single-Lap Joints of Similar and Dissimilar Adherends Bonded with an Acrylic Adhesive , 2009 .

[44]  J. Morais,et al.  Adhesively Bonded Repair Proposal for Wood Members Damaged by Horizontal Shear Using Carbon-Epoxy Patches , 2010 .

[45]  Andreas J. Brunner,et al.  Mode II fracture testing of composites: a new look at an old problem , 2006 .

[46]  M. D. Moura,et al.  Modelling single and double-lap repairs on composite materials , 2005 .

[47]  M.F.S.F. de Moura,et al.  Using a cohesive damage model to predict the tensile behaviour of CFRP single-strap repairs , 2008 .