The production of scientific knowledge on renewable energies: Worldwide trends, dynamics and challenges and implications for management

The present study investigates renewable energy analyzing the last twenty years of worldwide scientific production and the dynamics of interest around relevant policies in this direction. Based on a review on the role of knowledge development in technology transitions, we coupled bibliometric and expert debate approaches to provide decision makers with a sound analysis of thematic and regional trends in the field. Results show that the level of activity of researchers in the field of solar energy is somewhat contrasted only by biomass and wind energy. Despite countries being embedded in a global virtual network, geographical differences still arise: while North America and Europe show isomorphism of national communities and a high diversification of vertical foci, emerging research communities (e.g. BRICS countries) reflect market strategies (e.g. China) and the natural environment (e.g. Brazil) with a higher directionality of researches.

[1]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change , 2007 .

[2]  Luis Olmos,et al.  Public Support for the Financing of RD&D Activities in New Clean Energy Technologies , 2010 .

[3]  Yoshiyuki Takeda,et al.  Structure of research on biomass and bio-fuels: A citation-based approach , 2008 .

[4]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Transforming the Energy Sector : The evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology , 2004 .

[5]  B. Truffer,et al.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects , 2012 .

[6]  F. Geels Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[7]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis , 2008 .

[8]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer , 2011, ArXiv.

[9]  G. Dosi,et al.  The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called ‘European Paradox’ , 2006 .

[10]  Chris Hendry,et al.  So what do innovating companies really get from publicly funded demonstration projects and trials? innovation lessons from solar photovoltaics and wind , 2010 .

[11]  D. Loorbach Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework , 2010 .

[12]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[13]  Nees Jan van Eck,et al.  Bibliometric mapping of computer and information ethics , 2011, Ethics and Information Technology.

[14]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Restructuring energy systems for sustainability? Energy transition policy in the Netherlands , 2008 .

[15]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  Exploring the impact of technology foresight studies on innovation: Case of BRIC countries , 2012 .

[16]  Rommert Dekker,et al.  A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS , 2010 .

[17]  Chris Hendry,et al.  Pathways to commercial wind power in the US, Europe and Japan: The role of demonstration projects and field trials in the innovation process , 2009 .

[18]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  The elusive quest for technology-neutral policies , 2011 .

[19]  Arnulf Grubler,et al.  Energy transitions research: Insights and cautionary tales , 2012 .

[20]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[21]  Chris Hendry,et al.  Public demonstration projects and field trials: Accelerating commercialisation of sustainable technology in solar photovoltaics , 2009 .

[22]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges , 2010 .

[23]  Melih Soner Celiktas,et al.  A snapshot of renewable energy research in Turkey , 2009 .

[24]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: Contributions and suggestions for research , 2011 .

[25]  Igor Bashmakov,et al.  Three laws of energy transitions , 2007 .

[26]  Philip Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems: development opportunities from the ‘green turn’ , 2010, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[27]  Félix de Moya Anegón,et al.  Co-word based thematic analysis of renewable energy (1990–2010) , 2013, Scientometrics.

[28]  J. Schot,et al.  Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation : the approach of strategic niche management , 1998 .

[29]  Y. Kajikawa,et al.  Computer-assisted roadmapping: A case study in energy research , 2008, PICMET '08 - 2008 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology.

[30]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[31]  R. Kemp,et al.  The diffusion of clean technologies: A review with suggestions for future diffusion analysis , 2008 .

[32]  Xiaomei Tan,et al.  Clean technology R&D and innovation in emerging countries—Experience from China , 2010 .

[33]  Ron Boschma,et al.  Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography # 05 . 04 The spatial evolution of the British automobile industry , 2005 .

[34]  P. Romer Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[35]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis , 2006 .

[36]  Robert Phaal,et al.  Technology roadmapping—A planning framework for evolution and revolution , 2004 .

[37]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Translating Sustainabilities between Green Niches and Socio-Technical Regimes , 2007, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[38]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Dynamics of energy technologies and global change , 1999 .

[39]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  The importance of comprehensiveness in renewable electricity and energy-efficiency policy , 2009 .

[40]  J. Bergh,et al.  Demand-supply coevolution with multiple increasing returns: policy analysis for unlocking and system transitionsblocks , 2010 .

[41]  Murat Bengisu,et al.  Forecasting emerging technologies with the aid of science and technology databases , 2006 .

[42]  H. Rohracher,et al.  Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change , 2012 .

[43]  Yoshiyuki Takeda,et al.  Tracking emerging technologies in energy research : toward a roadmap for sustainable energy , 2008 .

[44]  Ed C. M. Noyons,et al.  Automatic term identification for bibliometric mapping , 2008, Scientometrics.

[45]  Consolación Gil,et al.  Scientific production of renewable energies worldwide: An overview , 2013 .

[46]  Joni Jupesta,et al.  Policy innovation for technology diffusion: a case-study of Japanese renewable energy public support programs , 2012, Sustainability Science.

[47]  John Cantwell,et al.  Multinational Corporations and European Regional Systems of Innovation , 2003 .

[48]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping , 2009, Scientometrics.

[49]  Robert Galvin,et al.  Roadmapping—A practitioner's update , 2004 .

[50]  M. Perkmann,et al.  The Two Faces of Collaboration: Impacts of University-Industry Relations on Public Research , 2009 .

[51]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .

[52]  Ed C. M. Noyons,et al.  A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[53]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Socio-cognitive evolution in niche development: Comparative analysis of biogas development in Denmark and the Netherlands (1973–2004) , 2010 .

[54]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Ivory tower and industrial innovation : university-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States , 2004 .

[55]  Fernando Hervás Soriano,et al.  EU Research and Innovation (R&I) in renewable energies: The role of the Strategic Energy Technology Plan (SET-Plan) , 2011 .

[56]  Bent Dalum,et al.  Cluster Emergence: A Comparative Study of Two Cases in North Jutland, Denmark , 2007 .

[57]  George Karypis,et al.  Power source roadmaps using bibliometrics and database tomography , 2005 .

[58]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The triple helix perspective of innovation systems , 2010, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[59]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an analytical framework and key issues for research , 2000 .