Casimir effect with machine learning

Vacuum fluctuations of quantum fields between physical objects depend on the shapes, positions, and internal composition of the latter. For objects of arbitrary shapes, even made from idealized materials, the calculation of the associated zero-point (Casimir) energy is an analytically intractable challenge. We propose a new numerical approach to this problem based on machine-learning techniques and illustrate the effectiveness of the method in a (2+1) dimensional scalar field theory. The Casimir energy is first calculated numerically using a Monte-Carlo algorithm for a set of the Dirichlet boundaries of various shapes. Then, a neural network is trained to compute this energy given the Dirichlet domain, treating the latter as black-and-white pixelated images. We show that after the learning phase, the neural network is able to quickly predict the Casimir energy for new boundaries of general shapes with reasonable accuracy.

[1]  Takuya Matsumoto,et al.  Classifying Topological Charge in SU(3) Yang-Mills Theory with Machine Learning , 2019, ArXiv.

[2]  L. Pang,et al.  Regressive and generative neural networks for scalar field theory , 2018, Physical Review D.

[3]  Igor P. Omelyan,et al.  Symplectic analytically integrable decomposition algorithms: classification, derivation, and application to molecular dynamics, quantum and celestial mechanics simulations , 2003 .

[4]  Calculating vacuum energies in renormalizable quantum field theories:: A new approach to the Casimir problem , 2002, hep-th/0207120.

[5]  M. Ulybyshev,et al.  Casimir energy in noncompact lattice electrodynamics , 2010 .

[6]  Steven G. Johnson.  Numerical Methods for Computing Casimir Interactions , 2011 .

[7]  Juan Carrasquilla,et al.  Machine learning quantum phases of matter beyond the fermion sign problem , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[8]  Jacob K. White,et al.  Efficient computation of Casimir interactions between arbitrary 3D objects. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[9]  William Detmold,et al.  Status and future perspectives for lattice gauge theory calculations to the exascale and beyond , 2019, The European Physical Journal A.

[10]  Pengfei Zhang,et al.  Machine Learning Topological Invariants with Neural Networks , 2017, Physical review letters.

[11]  Nikhil Ketkar,et al.  Deep Learning with Python , 2017 .

[12]  M. Ulybyshev,et al.  MONTE CARLO CALCULATION OF THE LATERAL CASIMIR FORCES BETWEEN RECTANGULAR GRATINGS WITHIN THE FORMALISM OF LATTICE QUANTUM FIELD THEORY , 2011, 1105.0544.

[13]  S. Lamoreaux.  Erratum: Demonstration of the Casimir Force in the 0.6 to 6 μ m Range [Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 5 (1997)] , 1998 .

[14]  S. Lamoreaux.  DEMONSTRATION OF THE CASIMIR FORCE IN THE 0.6 TO 6 MU M RANGE , 1997 .

[15]  E. Lifshitz,et al.  Direct measurement of molecular attraction between solids separated by a narrow gap , 1992 .

[16]  Nobuyuki Yoshioka,et al.  Constructing neural stationary states for open quantum many-body systems , 2019, Physical Review B.

[17]  Karl Jansen,et al.  HMC algorithm with multiple time scale integration and mass preconditioning , 2006, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[18]  Vedika Khemani,et al.  Machine Learning Out-of-Equilibrium Phases of Matter. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[19]  Sebastian Johann Wetzel,et al.  Unsupervised learning of phase transitions: from principal component analysis to variational autoencoders , 2017, Physical review. E.

[20]  R. Onofrio,et al.  Measurement of the Casimir force between parallel metallic surfaces. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[21]  M. Ulybyshev,et al.  Casimir energy in the compact QED on the lattice , 2009, 0901.1960.

[22]  Naftali Tishby,et al.  Machine learning and the physical sciences , 2019, Reviews of Modern Physics.

[23]  H. Matsueda,et al.  Image-processing the topological charge density in the $\mathbb{C}P^{N-1}$ model , 2018, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics.

[24]  H. Gies,et al.  Casimir effect on the worldline , 2003, hep-th/0303264.

[25]  Manuel Scherzer,et al.  Machine Learning of Explicit Order Parameters: From the Ising Model to SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory , 2017, 1705.05582.

[26]  Peter W. Milonni,et al.  The Casimir Effect: Physical Manifestations of Zero-Point Energy , 2003 .

[27]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  Properties of the vacuum. I. mechanical and thermodynamic , 1983 .

[28]  David J. Schwab,et al.  A high-bias, low-variance introduction to Machine Learning for physicists , 2018, Physics reports.

[29]  R Folk,et al.  Optimized Verlet-like algorithms for molecular dynamics simulations. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  Alexandra Nagy,et al.  Variational Quantum Monte Carlo Method with a Neural-Network Ansatz for Open Quantum Systems. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[31]  V. Goy,et al.  Casimir Effect in Yang-Mills Theory in D=2+1. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[32]  H. B. Chan,et al.  Measurement of the Casimir force between a gold sphere and a silicon surface with nanoscale trench arrays. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[33]  Worldline algorithms for Casimir configurations , 2006, quant-ph/0605141.

[34]  M. Ulybyshev,et al.  Casimir Energy Calculations Within the Formalism of Noncompact Lattice QED , 2009, 0911.2635.

[35]  N.Graham,et al.  The Dirichlet Casimir problem , 2003, hep-th/0309130.

[36]  Ye-Hua Liu,et al.  Discriminative Cooperative Networks for Detecting Phase Transitions. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[37]  R. Melko,et al.  Machine Learning Phases of Strongly Correlated Fermions , 2016, Physical Review X.

[38]  H. B. Chan,et al.  Erratum: Measurement of the Casimir Force between a Gold Sphere and a Silicon Surface with Nanoscale Trench Arrays [Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 030401 (2008)] , 2011 .

[39]  R. A. Vargas-Hernández,et al.  Extrapolating Quantum Observables with Machine Learning: Inferring Multiple Phase Transitions from Properties of a Single Phase. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[40]  S. Huber,et al.  Learning phase transitions by confusion , 2016, Nature Physics.

[41]  S. Reynaud,et al.  The Casimir effect within scattering theory , 2006, quant-ph/0611103.

[42]  J. Sexton,et al.  Hamiltonian evolution for the hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm , 1992 .

[43]  D. Roberts,et al.  On the attraction between two perfectly conducting plates , 2011 .

[44]  V. Goy,et al.  Casimir effect and deconfinement phase transition , 2017, 1709.02262.

[45]  S. Pasquali,et al.  Fluctuation-induced interactions between dielectrics in general geometries. , 2007, Journal of Chemical Physics.

[46]  Michael J. Hartmann,et al.  Neural-Network Approach to Dissipative Quantum Many-Body Dynamics. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[47]  V. Goy,et al.  Casimir effect on the lattice: U(1) gauge theory in two spatial dimensions , 2016, 1609.02323.

[48]  R. Stephenson.  A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[49]  H. Casimir,et al.  Influence of Retardation on the London–van der Waals Forces , 1946, Nature.

[50]  R. Jaffe,et al.  Casimir forces between arbitrary compact objects , 2007, 0710.5104.

[51]  Roger G. Melko,et al.  Machine learning phases of matter , 2016, Nature Physics.

[52]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Quantum Loop Topography for Machine Learning. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[53]  S. Lamoreaux.  Demonstration of the Casimir force in the 0.6 to 6 micrometers range , 1996 .

[54]  V. Goy,et al.  Nonperturbative Casimir effect and monopoles: compact Abelian gauge theory in two spatial dimensions , 2017, 1703.03439.

[55]  E. LESTER SMITH,et al.  AND OTHERS , 2005 .

[56]  Steven G. Johnson,et al.  The Casimir effect in microstructured geometries , 2011 .

[57]  Christoph Becker,et al.  Identifying quantum phase transitions using artificial neural networks on experimental data , 2018, Nature Physics.