Finding the Right Partners: Institutional and personal modes of governance of university-industry interactions

We study two different governance modes of university–industry interactions: in the institutional mode, interactions are mediated by the university through its administrative structures (such as departments or dedicated units such as technology transfer offices), while in the personal contractual mode interactions involve formal and binding contractual agreements between firms and individual academics, carried out without the direct involvement of the university. We argue that the choice of which form of governance to adopt involves different decision-making processes for firms and that both governance forms have important roles to play in the context of university–industry knowledge transfer. Relying on a representative sample of firms in the Italian region of Piedmont, we examine the characteristics and strategies of firms that interact with universities under different governance modes. Our results indicate that ignoring personal contractual arrangements with individual researchers, as the previous literature does, amounts to overlooking at least 50% of university–industry interactions. The econometric estimations suggest that personal contractual interactions are used relatively more by small firms involved in technology and open innovation strategies, while institutional interactions are mostly used by large firms that vertically integrate R&D activities.

[1]  E. Giuliani,et al.  Who are the researchers that are collaborating with industry? An analysis of the wine sectors in Chile, South Africa and Italy , 2010 .

[2]  M. Feldman,et al.  Entpreprenerial Universities and Technology Transfer: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Knowledge-Based Economic Development , 2006 .

[3]  Markus Perkmann,et al.  Engaging the Scholar: Three Types of Academic Consulting and Their Impact on Universities and Industry , 2008 .

[4]  Doris Schartinger,et al.  Interactive Relations Between Universities and Firms: Empirical Evidence for Austria , 2001 .

[5]  Jeffrey L. Jensen,et al.  The Influence of Federal Laboratory R&D on Industrial Research , 2000, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[6]  Florian Heiss,et al.  Structural Choice Analysis with Nested Logit Models , 2002 .

[7]  R. Nelson.  The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research , 1959, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  Pierre Mohnen,et al.  Série Scientifique Scientific Series What Type of Enterprise Forges Close Links with Universities and Government Labs? Evidence from Cis 2 What Type of Enterprise Forges Close Links with Universities and Government Labs? Evidence from Cis 2 , 2022 .

[9]  Rna Rudi Bekkers,et al.  Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? , 2008 .

[10]  Kenneth A. Small,et al.  EFFICIENT ESTIMATION OF NESTED LOGIT MODELS , 1985 .

[11]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[12]  Philip Shapira,et al.  Partnering with universities: a good choice for nanotechnology start-up firms? , 2009, Small Business Economics.

[13]  A. Geuna,et al.  The Governance of University Knowledge Transfer: A Critical Review of the Literature , 2009 .

[14]  Ammon Salter,et al.  Searching Low and High : What Types of Firms use Universities as a Source of Innovation ? , 2003 .

[15]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Academic research and industrial innovation , 1991 .

[16]  A. Salter,et al.  Exploring the Effect of Geographical Proximity and University Quality on University–Industry Collaboration in the United Kingdom , 2011 .

[17]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? , 2007 .

[18]  Jonathan Liebenau.  Innovation in Pharmaceuticals : Industrial R&D in the early Twentieth Century : Research Policy , 1985 .

[19]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  The second academic revolution and the rise of entrepreneurial science , 2001, IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag..

[20]  Richard A. Jensen,et al.  University-Industry Spillovers, Government Funding, and Industrial Consulting , 2010 .

[21]  Gustavo Crespi,et al.  University IPRs and knowledge transfer: is university ownership more efficient? , 2010 .

[22]  Philip Ternouth,et al.  Universities, business and knowledge exchange , 2008 .

[23]  S. Gopalakrishnan,et al.  The Institutionalization of Knowledge Transfer Activities within Industry-University Collaborative Ventures , 2000 .

[24]  J. Swann.  Academic scientists and the pharmaceutical industry , 1988 .

[25]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms , 2004 .

[26]  A. Salter,et al.  Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? , 2004 .

[27]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy , 2004 .

[28]  Jeffrey L. Furman,et al.  Early Academis Science and the Birth of Industrial Research Laboratories in the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry , 2005 .

[29]  Rossi Federica,et al.  Changes to university IPR regulations in Europe and the impact on academic patenting , 2010 .

[30]  P. Boardman,et al.  University researchers working with private companies , 2009 .

[31]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[32]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  The spatial profile of university-business research partnerships , 2010 .

[33]  Andreas Panagopoulos,et al.  Understanding when universities and firms form RJVs: the importance of intellectual property protection , 2003 .

[34]  A. Geuna,et al.  Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling , 2006 .

[35]  Qing Wang,et al.  Complexity and the functions of the firm : breadth and depth , 2000 .

[36]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  Emergence of a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations , 1996 .

[37]  Patrick Llerena,et al.  Academic patenting in Europe: new evidence from the KEINS database , 2008 .

[38]  B. Verspagen,et al.  Formal and informal external linkages and firms’ innovative strategies. A cross-country comparison , 2011 .

[39]  M. Perkmann,et al.  Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations , 2009 .

[40]  U. Schmoch,et al.  Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields , 1998 .

[41]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[42]  Nicola Lacetera,et al.  Di¤erent Missions and Commitment Power in R&d Organization: Theory and Evidence on Industry-university Alliances , 2022 .

[43]  Stefano Brusoni,et al.  Knowledge Specialisation and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More Than They Do? , 2001 .

[44]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major U.S. Universities , 2001 .

[45]  Vincent Mangematin,et al.  Profile of public laboratories, industrial partnerships and organisation of R & D: the dynamics of industrial relationships in a large research organisation , 1996 .

[46]  W. Greene,et al.  Specification and estimation of the nested logit model: alternative normalisations , 2002 .

[47]  G. Meyer-Thurow,et al.  The Industrialization of Invention: A Case Study from the German Chemical Industry , 1982, Isis.

[48]  D. Ulph,et al.  Optimal incentives for income-generation in universities: the rule of thumb for the Compton tax , 2003 .

[49]  Roberto Mazzoleni,et al.  How Do University Inventions Get into Practice ? , 2000 .

[50]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[51]  Rudi Bekkers,et al.  Analysing preferences for knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? , 2008 .

[52]  John Beath,et al.  Optimal Incentives for Income-Generation within Universities , 2000 .

[53]  B. Verspagen,et al.  Formal and informal external linkages and firms' innovative strategies , 2008 .

[54]  Wendy H. Schacht.  The Bayh-Dole Act: Selected Issues in Patent Policy and the Commercialization of Technology , 2012 .

[55]  T. S. Adams,et al.  National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. , 1920, Quarterly Publications of the American Statistical Association.

[56]  R. Veugelers,et al.  COMPLEMENTARITY BETWEEN TECHNOLOGY MAKE AND BUY IN INNOVATION STRATEGIES : EVIDENCE FROM BELGIAN MANUFACTURING FIRMS , 1998 .

[57]  Nicolas Carayol,et al.  Objectives , Agreements and Matching in Science-Industry Collaborations : Reassembling the Pieces of the Puzzle , 2003 .

[58]  Pamela Mueller,et al.  Exploring the Knowledge Filter: How Entrepreneurship and University-Industry Relationships Drive Economic Growth ∗ , 2006 .

[59]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology and Their Implications for Corporate Strategy , 2000 .

[60]  D. Rebne,et al.  Faculty Consulting and Scientific Knowledge: A Traditional University-Industry Linkage , 1989 .

[61]  A. Link,et al.  Universities as research joint venture partners: does size of the venture matter? , 1998 .

[62]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature , 2007 .

[63]  E. Malecki,et al.  Extroverts and introverts: small manufacturers and their information sources , 1999 .