Image quality and visual attention interactions: Towards a more reliable analysis in the saliency space

Understanding bottom-up and top-down visual attention mechanisms related to visual quality perception can be greatly beneficial for the design of effective objective quality metrics. Subjective studies based on eye-movement tracking have been recently published that try to get more insight in these interactions. However, it is still not easy to find coherence across their results, also due to the different methodologies adopted to analyze eye-tracking data. In this paper we propose a robust methodology to measure differences between eye-tracking data collected under different experimental conditions. The proposed method takes into account inter-observer variability and content effects, producing results that give an accurate insight in attention variations.

[1]  S Ullman,et al.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[2]  Nathan J. Anderson,et al.  Using performance efficiency for testing and optimization of visual attention models , 2011, Electronic Imaging.

[3]  Patrick Le Callet,et al.  Do video coding impairments disturb the visual attention deployment? , 2010, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[4]  E.C.L. Vu,et al.  Visual Fixation Patterns when Judging Image Quality: Effects of Distortion Type, Amount, and Subject Experience , 2008, 2008 IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation.

[5]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[6]  A. L. Yarbus,et al.  Eye Movements and Vision , 1967, Springer US.

[7]  Jukka Häkkinen,et al.  Can eye movements be quantitatively applied to image quality studies? , 2004, NordiCHI '04.

[8]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image quality assessment using natural scene statistics , 2004 .

[9]  Asha Iyer,et al.  Components of bottom-up gaze allocation in natural images , 2005, Vision Research.

[10]  Patrick Le Callet,et al.  Task impact on the visual attention in subjective image quality assessment , 2006, 2006 14th European Signal Processing Conference.

[11]  Judith Redi,et al.  Interactions of visual attention and quality perception , 2011, Electronic Imaging.

[12]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[13]  Quan Huynh-Thu,et al.  Examination of 3D visual attention in stereoscopic video content , 2011, Electronic Imaging.

[14]  A. L. I︠A︡rbus Eye Movements and Vision , 1967 .

[15]  Judith Redi,et al.  Studying the effect of optimizing the image quality in saliency regions at the expense of background content , 2010, Electronic Imaging.