Building a Software Tool for Transparent and Efficient Process Assessments in IT Service Management

Process improvements provide a structured approach for organisations to improve the way they operate. A number of process improvement methodologies such as ISO9000, TQM, Six Sigma, Lean, and Agile have been proposed over the last few decades and subsequently software tools have been developed to apply these methodologies. However determination of process ca-pability to measure improvement is predominantly conducted by expert process assessors and consultants with proprietary frameworks. We propose the use of the international standard for process assessment ISO/IEC 15504 for a transparent measurement of process capability. We also demonstrate development of a software tool based on the standard that can facilitate organisations to assess their processes efficiently. In this paper, we explain the development, implementation and preliminary evaluation of a software-mediated process assessment approach in the area of IT Service Management at a large public-sector IT organisation in Queensland, Australia. This paper’s contribution is the integration of the design science research methodology with the task-technology fit theory for the development of the software tool as a research artefact. For practitioners the project demonstrates transparent and efficient assessment of IT service processes to facilitate continual improvement.

[1]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  An Assessment of Equivalence Between Online and Mail Surveys in Service Research , 2006 .

[2]  H. Harrington Business process improvement : the breakthrough strategy for total quality, productivity, and competitiveness , 1991 .

[3]  Ruth Sara Aguilar-Savén,et al.  Business process modelling: Review and framework , 2004 .

[4]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[5]  John R. Venable,et al.  The role of theory and theorising in Design Science research , 2006 .

[6]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Strategies for Design Science Research Evaluation , 2008, ECIS.

[7]  Jan vom Brocke,et al.  Design Science at the Intersection of Physical and Virtual Design , 2013, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[8]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  Promoting Relevance in IS Research: An Informing System for Design Science Research , 2011, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[9]  Terry Rout,et al.  Process improvement for small firms: An evaluation of the RAPID assessment-based method , 2006, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[10]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[11]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[12]  Assessment Method Integrated Team,et al.  Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI), Version 1.1: Method Definition Document , 2001 .

[13]  Sue Conger,et al.  Confusion in the Ranks: IT Service Management Practice and Terminology , 2009, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[14]  Steven De Haes,et al.  COBIT 5 and Enterprise Governance of Information Technology: Building Blocks and Research Opportunities , 2013, J. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Antònia Mas Picahaco,et al.  IT Service Management Process Improvement based on ISO/IEC 15504: A systematic review , 2012, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[16]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[17]  Lon Roberts,et al.  Process Reengineering: The Key to Achieving Breakthrough Success , 1994 .

[18]  Rini van Solingen,et al.  Goal Question Metric (GQM) Approach , 2002 .

[19]  Mark A. Toleman,et al.  A Decision Support Tool to Define Scope in IT Service Management Process Assessment and Improvement , 2013, DESRIST.

[20]  Terence Patrick Rout,et al.  Harmonizing ISO-IEC 15504 and CMMI , 2007 .

[21]  John J. Marciniak,et al.  Encyclopedia of Software Engineering , 1994, Encyclopedia of Software Engineering.

[22]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness , 1998, MIS Q..

[23]  Mauri Laitinen,et al.  Process assessment considered wasteful , 1997, CACM.

[24]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Does Fit Matter? The Impact of Task-Technology Fit and Appropriation on Team Performance in Repeated Tasks , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..