Pseudouridylation meets next-generation sequencing.

The isomerization of uridine to pseudouridine (Ψ), known as pseudouridylation, is the most abundant post-transcriptional modification of stable RNAs. Due to technical limitations in pseudouridine detection methods, studies on pseudouridylation have historically focused on ribosomal RNAs, transfer RNAs, and spliceosomal small nuclear RNAs, where Ψs play a critical role in RNA biogenesis and function. Recently, however, a series of deep sequencing methods-Pseudo-seq, Ψ-seq, PSI-seq, and CeU-seq-has been published to map Ψ positions across the entire transcriptome with single nucleotide resolution. These data have greatly expanded the catalogue of pseudouridylated transcripts, which include messenger RNAs and noncoding RNAs. Furthermore, these methods have revealed conditionally-dependent sites of pseudouridylation that appear in response to cellular stress, suggesting that pseudouridylation may play a role in dynamically modulating RNA function. Collectively, these methods have opened the door to further study of the biological relevance of naturally occurring Ψs. However, an in-depth comparison of these techniques and their results has not yet been undertaken despite all four methods relying on the same basic principle: Ψ detection through selective chemical labeling by the carbodiimide known as CMC. In this article, we will outline the currently available high-throughput Ψ-detection methods and present a comparative analysis of their results. We will then discuss the merits and limitations of these approaches, including those inherent in CMC conjugation, and their potential to further elucidate the function of this ubiquitous and dynamic modification.

[1]  Andrei V Bakin,et al.  Clustering of pseudouridine residues around the peptidyltransferase center of yeast cytoplasmic and mitochondrial ribosomes. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[2]  T. Pan,et al.  Rationalization and prediction of selective decoding of pseudouridine-modified nonsense and sense codons. , 2012, RNA.

[3]  A. Yu,et al.  Functions and mechanisms of spliceosomal small nuclear RNA pseudouridylation , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA.

[4]  V. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Unusual base pairing during the decoding of a stop codon by the ribosome , 2013, Nature.

[5]  Tamás Kiss,et al.  Site-Specific Pseudouridine Formation in Preribosomal RNA Is Guided by Small Nucleolar RNAs , 1997, Cell.

[6]  R. Planta,et al.  The yeast gene YNL292w encodes a pseudouridine synthase (Pus4) catalyzing the formation of psi55 in both mitochondrial and cytoplasmic tRNAs. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  M. W. Gray,et al.  Pseudouridine in RNA: What, Where, How, and Why , 2000, IUBMB life.

[8]  S. P. Fodor,et al.  Counting individual DNA molecules by the stochastic attachment of diverse labels , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Davide Ruggero,et al.  rRNA pseudouridylation defects affect ribosomal ligand binding and translational fidelity from yeast to human cells. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[10]  M. Fournier,et al.  Loss of rRNA modifications in the decoding center of the ribosome impairs translation and strongly delays pre-rRNA processing. , 2009, RNA.

[11]  K. Collins,et al.  A telomerase component is defective in the human disease dyskeratosis congenita , 1999, Nature.

[12]  Hiroki Kato,et al.  Incorporation of pseudouridine into mRNA yields superior nonimmunogenic vector with increased translational capacity and biological stability. , 2008, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[13]  J. Ni,et al.  Small Nucleolar RNAs Direct Site-Specific Synthesis of Pseudouridine in Ribosomal RNA , 1997, Cell.

[14]  Shiqing Ma,et al.  Chemical pulldown reveals dynamic pseudouridylation of the mammalian transcriptome. , 2015, Nature chemical biology.

[15]  P. Brown,et al.  Transcriptome-Wide Mapping of Pseudouridines: Pseudouridine Synthases Modify Specific mRNAs in S. cerevisiae , 2014, PloS one.

[16]  N. L. Greenbaum,et al.  Investigation of Overhauser effects between pseudouridine and water protons in RNA helices , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  W. Cohn,et al.  Some results of the applications of ion-exchange chromatography to nucleic acid chemistry. , 1951, Journal of cellular physiology. Supplement.

[18]  Maxwell R. Mumbach,et al.  Transcriptome-wide Mapping Reveals Widespread Dynamic-Regulated Pseudouridylation of ncRNA and mRNA , 2014, Cell.

[19]  J. Rousset,et al.  Nucleotide modifications in three functionally important regions of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ribosome affect translation accuracy , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[20]  J. Bujnicki,et al.  MODOMICS: a database of RNA modification pathways—2013 update , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[21]  J. T. Madison,et al.  NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCES IN THE YEAST ALANINE TRANSFER RIBONUCLEIC ACID. , 1965, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[22]  J. Steitz,et al.  Modifications of U2 snRNA are required for snRNP assembly and pre‐mRNA splicing , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[23]  S. P. Fodor,et al.  Molecular indexing enables quantitative targeted RNA sequencing and reveals poor efficiencies in standard library preparations , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  F. Davis,et al.  Ribonucleic acids from yeast which contain a fifth nucleotide. , 1957, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[25]  W. Gilbert,et al.  Pseudo-Seq: Genome-Wide Detection of Pseudouridine Modifications in RNA. , 2015, Methods in enzymology.

[26]  Robert D. Finn,et al.  InterPro in 2011: new developments in the family and domain prediction database , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[27]  J Ofengand,et al.  Mapping to nucleotide resolution of pseudouridine residues in large subunit ribosomal RNAs from representative eukaryotes, prokaryotes, archaebacteria, mitochondria and chloroplasts. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  J Ofengand,et al.  Four newly located pseudouridylate residues in Escherichia coli 23S ribosomal RNA are all at the peptidyltransferase center: analysis by the application of a new sequencing technique. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[29]  D. Tollervey,et al.  Nop58p is a common component of the box C+D snoRNPs that is required for snoRNA stability. , 1999, RNA.

[30]  B. Roe,et al.  The nucleotide sequence of human tRNAGly (anticodon GCC). , 1979, Nucleic acids research.

[31]  J. Ofengand,et al.  Number, position, and significance of the pseudouridines in the large subunit ribosomal RNA of Haloarcula marismortui and Deinococcus radiodurans. , 2005, RNA.

[32]  Anindita Basak,et al.  A pseudouridine residue in the spliceosome core is part of the filamentous growth program in yeast. , 2014, Cell reports.

[33]  U. Meier Pseudouridylation goes regulatory , 2011, The EMBO journal.

[34]  M. Helm,et al.  Pseudouridine: Still mysterious, but never a fake (uridine)! , 2014, RNA biology.

[35]  C. A. Theimer,et al.  Effect of pseudouridylation on the structure and activity of the catalytically essential P6.1 hairpin in human telomerase RNA , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[36]  Wayne A. Decatur,et al.  Genome-wide searching for pseudouridylation guide snoRNAs: analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[37]  T. Steitz,et al.  Crystal structure of unmodified tRNA(Gln) complexed with glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase and ATP suggests a possible role for pseudo-uridines in stabilization of RNA structure. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[38]  Tony Z. Jia,et al.  Digital RNA sequencing minimizes sequence-dependent bias and amplification noise with optimized single-molecule barcodes , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Minoru Yoshida,et al.  MALAT1 long non-coding RNA in cancer. , 2016, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[40]  M. Taoka,et al.  A mass spectrometry-based method for comprehensive quantitative determination of post-transcriptional RNA modifications: the complete chemical structure of Schizosaccharomyces pombe ribosomal RNAs , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[41]  Yi-Tao Yu,et al.  U2 snRNA is inducibly pseudouridylated at novel sites by Pus7p and snR81 RNP , 2011, The EMBO journal.

[42]  Niki S. C. Wong,et al.  28S rRNA is inducibly pseudouridylated by the mTOR pathway translational control in CHO cell cultures. , 2014, Journal of biotechnology.

[43]  John Karijolich,et al.  Modifying the genetic code: Converting nonsense codons into sense codons by targeted pseudouridylation , 2011, Nature.

[44]  Francesco Piazza,et al.  Dyskeratosis Congenita and Cancer in Mice Deficient in Ribosomal RNA Modification , 2003, Science.

[45]  James A. Casbon,et al.  A method for counting PCR template molecules with application to next-generation sequencing , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[46]  Y. Zhang,et al.  In vivo genome-wide profiling of RNA secondary structure reveals novel regulatory features , 2013, Nature.

[47]  Xinliang Zhao,et al.  Pseudouridylation (Ψ) of U2 snRNA in S.cerevisiae is catalyzed by an RNA‐independent mechanism , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[48]  Wayne A. Decatur,et al.  rRNA modifications and ribosome function. , 2002, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[49]  D. S. McPheeters,et al.  ψ35 in the Branch Site Recognition Region of U2 Small Nuclear RNA Is Important for Pre-mRNA Splicing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[50]  W. Gilbert,et al.  Pseudouridine profiling reveals regulated mRNA pseudouridylation in yeast and human cells , 2014, Nature.

[51]  Bryan S. Sibert,et al.  Pseudouridine synthase 1: a site-specific synthase without strict sequence recognition requirements , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[52]  Christiane Branlant,et al.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae U2 snRNA:pseudouridine-synthase Pus7p is a novel multisite-multisubstrate RNA:Psi-synthase also acting on tRNAs. , 2003, RNA.

[53]  Nian Liu,et al.  Probing N6-methyladenosine RNA modification status at single nucleotide resolution in mRNA and long noncoding RNA , 2013, RNA.

[54]  P. Limbach,et al.  Improving CMC-derivatization of pseudouridine in RNA for mass spectrometric detection. , 2008, Analytica chimica acta.

[55]  A. Hüttenhofer,et al.  RNomics: an experimental approach that identifies 201 candidates for novel, small, non‐messenger RNAs in mouse , 2001, The EMBO journal.