Preschool children's interpretation of object-initial sentences: neural correlates of their behavioral performance.

The acquisition of the function of case-marking is a key step in the development of sentence processing for German-speaking children since case-marking reveals the relations between sentential arguments. In this study, we investigated the development of the processing of case-marking and argument structures in children at 3, 4;6 and 6 years of age, as well as its processing in adults. Using EEG, we measured event-related potentials (ERPs) in response to object-initial compared to subject-initial German sentences including transitive verbs and case-marked noun phrases referring to animate arguments. We also tested children's behavioral competence in a sentence-picture matching task. Word order and case-marking were manipulated in German main clauses. Adults' behavioral performance was close to perfect and their ERPs revealed a negativity for the processing of the topicalized accusative marked noun phrase (NP1) and no effect for the second NP (NP2) in the object-initial structure. Children's behavioral data showed a significant above-chance outcome in the subject-initial condition for all age groups, but not for the object-initial condition. In contrast to adults, the ERPs of 3-year-olds showed a positivity at NP1, indicating difficulties in processing the non-canonical object-initial structures. Children at the age of 4;6 did not differ in the processing patterns of object-initial vs. subject-initial sentences at NP1 but showed a slight positivity at NP2. This positivity at NP2, which implies syntactic integration difficulties, is more pronounced in 6-year-olds but is absent in adults. At NP1, however, 6-year-olds show the same negativity as adults. In sum, the behavioral and electrophysiological findings demonstrate that children in each age group use different strategies, which are indicative of their developmental stage. While 3-year-olds merely detect differences in the two sentence structures without being able to use this information for sentence comprehension, 4;6-year-olds proceed to use mainly a word-order strategy, processing NP1 in both conditions in the same manner, which leads to processing difficulties upon detecting case-marking cues at NP2. At the age of 6, children are able to use case-marking cues for comprehension but still show enhanced effort for correct thematic-role assignment.

[1]  D. Caplan,et al.  Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[2]  Patricia K Kuhl,et al.  Sentence processing in 30-month-old children: an event-related potential study , 2005, Neuroreport.

[3]  G. Szagun.  Sprachentwicklung beim Kind , 2006 .

[4]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  The neurophysiological basis of word order variations in German , 2003, Brain and Language.

[5]  Katrin Lindner,et al.  The development of sentence-interpretation strategies in monolingual German-learning children with and without specific language impairment , 2003 .

[6]  Kerstin Leuckefeld,et al.  The development of argument processing mechanisms in German: An electrophysiological investigation with school-aged children and adults , 2005 .

[7]  M. De Vincenzi.  Syntactic analysis in sentence comprehension: effects of dependency types and grammatical constraints. , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[8]  Christine S. Schipke,et al.  Brain responses to case-marking violations in German preschool children , 2011, Neuroreport.

[9]  A D Friederici,et al.  Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[10]  Amelie Mahlstedt.  The acquisition of case marking information as a cue to argument interpretation in German : an electrophysiological investigation with pre-school children , 2008 .

[11]  B. McElree,et al.  Multi-dimensional contributions to garden path strength: Dissociating phrase structure from case marking , 2004 .

[12]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  Context-sensitive neural responses to conflict resolution: Electrophysiological evidence from subject–object ambiguities in language comprehension , 2006, Brain Research.

[13]  A. Friederici,et al.  Syntactic event-related potential components in 24-month-olds’ sentence comprehension , 2006, Neuroreport.

[14]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  On incremental interpretation: Degrees of meaning accessed during sentence comprehension , 2004 .

[15]  J. D. Saddy,et al.  Symbolic dynamics of event-related brain potentials. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[16]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Neural Correlates of Syntactic Processing in Two-Year-Olds , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  A D Friederici,et al.  Syntactic parsing as revealed by brain responses: First-pass and second-pass parsing processes , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[18]  C. Fiebach,et al.  Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: the processing of German WH-questions , 2002 .

[19]  H. Mai,et al.  The costs of freedom: an ERP – study of non-canonical sentences , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Grammar overrides frequency: evidence from the online processing of flexible word order , 2002, Cognition.

[21]  Brigitte Röder,et al.  Parsing of Sentences in a Language with Varying Word Order: Word-by-Word Variations of Processing Demands Are Revealed by Event-Related Brain Potentials ☆ ☆☆ ★ , 1998 .

[22]  M. de Vincenzi,et al.  Syntactic Parsing Strategies in Italian: The Minimal Chain Principle , 1991 .

[23]  Patricia K Kuhl,et al.  An event-related brain potential study of sentence comprehension in preschoolers: semantic and morphosyntactic processing. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[24]  Claudia Männel,et al.  Pauses and Intonational Phrasing: ERP Studies in 5-month-old German Infants and Adults , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Children's understanding of the agent-patient relations in the transitive construction: Cross-linguistic comparisons between Cantonese, German, and English , 2009 .

[26]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Functionalism and the competition model , 1989 .

[27]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Young children's productivity with word order and verb morphology. , 1997, Developmental psychology.

[28]  Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky,et al.  Prominence vs. aboutness in sequencing: A functional distinction within the left inferior frontal gyrus , 2012, Brain and Language.

[29]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  The extended argument dependency model: a neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. , 2006, Psychological review.

[30]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly: Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech , 1993 .

[31]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[32]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  Beyond syntax: Language-related positivities reflect the revision of hierarchies , 2002, Neuroreport.

[33]  Kirsten Abbot-Smith,et al.  German children's comprehension of word order and case marking in causative sentences. , 2008, Child development.

[34]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  The P600 as an indicator of syntactic ambiguity , 2002, Cognition.

[35]  S. Frisch,et al.  The N400 reflects problems of thematic hierarchizing , 2001, Neuroreport.

[36]  Gina R. Kuperberg,et al.  Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax , 2007, Brain Research.

[37]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  The resolution of case conflicts from a neurophysiological perspective. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[39]  Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz,et al.  Two-year-olds compute syntactic structure on-line. , 2010, Developmental science.

[40]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing , 1993 .