Entering new territory: A study of internal crisis management and crisis communication in organizations

Abstract The aim of this paper is to present and discuss some of the main findings from a large survey of internal crisis management and crisis communication conducted in the spring of 2011 among public and private organizations in Denmark (the ICMCC survey). The survey was conducted among the 367 largest private companies (selected from DK 1000, established by Borsen business magasin) and among 98 public organizations (municipalities). The overall goal was to get a preliminary idea of how these companies or organizations perceive, plan, coordinate and implement internal crisis management and crisis communication activities before, during and after a crisis. The survey questionnaire comprised 36 questions and was sent to respondents who typically are responsible for the crisis-preparedness of their organizations. The results from the survey show that the vast majority of organizations have a crisis or contingency plan, and most of these plans contain an internal dimension relating to the management and communication with the internal stakeholders during a crisis. Thus, the study shows a rather professional and formalized behavior towards crisis management in general, but also when it comes to managing a crisis in relation to the internal organizational stakeholders in specific. In addition, the results clearly indicate a strong relation between organizational size and crisis management; the larger the organization the more likely to have a crisis plan. This particularly pertained to the private organizations. The ICMCC survey forms part of a major collaborative research project, financed by the Danish Council for Independent Research/Social Sciences (2011–2014), entitled Internal Crisis Management and Crisis Communication in Danish Organizations. The purpose of this three-year long project is to shed light upon the role of internal crisis management and crisis communication before, during and after an organizational crisis and/or a societal crisis leading to downsizing or major changes within an organization or an organizational field.

[1]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. , 2001 .

[2]  W. T. Coombs,et al.  Ongoing Crisis Communication: Planning, Managing, and Responding , 1999 .

[3]  Maureen Taylor.  Toward a Holistic Organizational Approach to Understanding Crisis , 2010 .

[4]  M. O'hare,et al.  Searching for Safety , 1990 .

[5]  K. Weick.  ENACTED SENSEMAKING IN CRISIS SITUATIONS[1] , 1988 .

[6]  I. Mitroff.  Crisis Leadership: Planning for the Unthinkable , 2003 .

[7]  K. Weick.  The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster , 1993 .

[8]  R. Gephart.  Crisis Sensemaking and the Public Inquiry , 2007 .

[9]  Winni Johansen,et al.  The study of internal crisis communication: towards an integrative framework , 2011 .

[10]  Susanne G. Scott,et al.  HEARING IT THROUGH THE GRAPEVINE: THE INFLUENCE OF SOURCE, LEADER‐RELATIONS, AND LEGITIMACY ON SURVIVORS' FAIRNESS PERCEPTIONS , 1998 .

[11]  J. Penrose.  The role of perception in crisis planning , 2000 .

[12]  K. Weick,et al.  Hospitals as Cultures of Entrapment: A Re-Analysis of the Bristol Royal Infirmary , 2003 .

[13]  William L. Benoit,et al.  Accounts, excuses, and apologies : a theory of image restoration strategies , 1994 .

[14]  E. Stern,et al.  The Politics of Crisis Management: Public Leadership under Pressure , 2005 .

[15]  D. Christopher Kayes,et al.  The 1996 Mount Everest climbing disaster: The breakdown of learning in teams , 2004 .

[16]  K. Weick.  Making Sense of the Organization, Volume 2: The Impermanent Organization , 2009 .

[17]  Robert P. Gephart,et al.  Sensemaking, communicative distortion and the logic of public inquiry legitimation , 1992 .

[18]  D. Wicks.  Institutionalized Mindsets of Invulnerability: Differentiated Institutional Fields and the Antecedents of Organizational Crisis , 2001 .

[19]  K. Weick.  Reflections on Enacted Sensemaking in the Bhopal Disaster , 2010 .

[20]  K. WeiK..  The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster , 2009, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[21]  Andrew D. Brown.  Making Sense of Inquiry Sensemaking , 2002 .

[22]  Kathleen Fearn-Banks.  Crisis Communications: A Casebook Approach , 1996 .

[23]  K. Weick.  The Vulnerable System: An Analysis of the Tenerife Air Disaster , 1990 .

[24]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[25]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[26]  P. Finley.  Why Some Companies Emerge Stronger and Better from a Crisis: Seven Essential Lessons for Surviving Disaster , 2006 .

[27]  K. Weick.  Making Sense of the Organization , 2000 .

[28]  S. Maitlis,et al.  Sensemaking in Crisis and Change: Inspiration and Insights from Weick (1988) , 2010 .

[29]  R. Gephart.  The textual approach: Risk and blame in disaster sensemaking , 1993 .

[30]  Thierry C. Pauchant,et al.  Transforming the Crisis-Prone Organization: Preventing Individual, Organizational, and Environmental Tragedies , 1992 .