MAST: Results and Upgrade Activities

MAST, alongside other spherical Tokamaks (STs), provides new perspectives on Tokamak physics for ITER and beyond and a platform to explore the potential of the ST as the core of a Component Test Facility (CTF) to test and develop components and technology for fusion power plants. MAST is one of the two largest STs in the world, the other being NSTX (PPPL, U.S.). Recent physics results include new measurements of the edge pedestal, the use of magnetic perturbations to influence edge-localized modes, pellet fueling, H-mode access, core transport, confinement scaling, fast-particle physics, and MHD instabilities. The program makes use of a set of unusually high resolution and wide-viewing diagnostics on MAST, since, in most experiments, the focus is on understanding the mechanisms, to support predictive modeling and comparison with other types of Tokamak. The first stage of a major upgrade is under way which will raise the heating power and toroidal field by 50% and almost double the inductive flux swing to allow long pulses and sustained noninductively driven plasmas. In particular, 17 poloidal field coils and an in-vessel cryopump will be added to allow an expanded divertor based on the “super-X” concept, as well as a conventional configuration. These upgrades will transform the operating space, pulselength, and flexibility of MAST for goal-oriented research and as a user facility. The heating and pulselength upgrades are aimed at testing off-axis current drive and fast-particle effects (important for sustained Tokamak fusion plasmas) and developing steady-state scenarios for a CTF. The divertor development is part of a growing international effort to find solutions for the power exhaust which ease the technology and material advances needed for the divertor plasma-facing components in a fusion power plant.

[1]  S. Saarelma,et al.  L–H transition and pedestal studies on MAST , 2011 .

[2]  S. Pinches,et al.  Study of the fast ion confinement and current profile control on MAST , 2009 .

[3]  R. Scannell,et al.  Disruption mitigation studies on the Mega Amp Spherical Tokamak (MAST) , 2011 .

[4]  David Taylor,et al.  SUPER-X ADVANCED DIVERTOR DESIGN FOR MAST UPGRADE , 2009 .

[5]  C. Roach,et al.  Towards the construction of a model to describe the inter-ELM evolution of the pedestal on MAST , 2011, 1107.3109.

[6]  J. Contributors,et al.  A model of ELM filament energy evolution due to parallel losses , 2005 .

[7]  V A Soukhanovskii,et al.  Taming the plasma–material interface with the ‘snowflake’ divertor in NSTX , 2015 .

[8]  R. Vann,et al.  Two-Dimensional Studies of Electron Bernstein Wave Emission in MAST , 2011 .

[9]  C. Challis,et al.  Test of current diffusion modelling in MAST current ramp-up , 2011 .

[10]  G. Naylor,et al.  Synchronization of Thomson scattering measurements on MAST using an FPGA based "Smart" trigger unit. , 2010, The Review of scientific instruments.

[11]  G. Naylor,et al.  A 130 point Nd:YAG Thomson scattering diagnostic on MAST. , 2010, The Review of scientific instruments.

[12]  D. Ryutov Geometrical properties of a “snowflake” divertor , 2007 .

[13]  M. Becoulet,et al.  Resonant magnetic perturbation experiments on MAST using external and internal coils for ELM control , 2010 .

[14]  Y. Gribov,et al.  Modelling of plasma response to resonant magnetic perturbation fields in MAST and ITER , 2011 .

[15]  M. Cox The Mega Amp Spherical Tokamak , 1999 .

[16]  M. Cecconello,et al.  A neutron camera system for MAST. , 2010, The Review of scientific instruments.

[17]  A. Field,et al.  The upgrade to the Mega Amp Spherical Tokamak , 2010 .

[18]  C. Roach,et al.  Kinetic instabilities that limit β in the edge of a tokamak plasma: a picture of an H-mode pedestal. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[19]  T O'Gorman,et al.  Design of a new Nd:YAG Thomson scattering system for MAST. , 2008, The Review of scientific instruments.

[20]  W. A. Cooper,et al.  Magnetic reconnection triggering magnetohydrodynamic instabilities during a sawtooth crash in a Tokamak plasma. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[21]  Yueqiang Liu,et al.  Magnetic perturbation experiments on MAST L- and H-mode plasmas using internal coils , 2011 .

[22]  R. D. Stambaugh,et al.  A fusion development facility on the critical path to fusion energy , 2011 .

[23]  R. McAdams,et al.  Engineering design of the double neutral beam injection system for MAST Upgrade , 2011 .

[24]  G. Maddison,et al.  Observation and analysis of pellet material ∇B drift on MAST , 2010 .

[25]  G. Voss,et al.  MAST Upgrade centre column design and analysis , 2011 .

[26]  P. M. Ryan,et al.  Overview of physics results from MAST , 2007 .

[27]  G. Voss,et al.  Neutronics analysis of the conceptual design of a component test facility based on the spherical tokamak , 2010 .

[28]  M. R. O'Brien,et al.  Electron Bernstein wave assisted plasma current start-up in MAST , 2010 .

[29]  V. Rozhansky,et al.  Possible mechanism for filament motion in the SOL of a tokamak , 2008 .

[30]  J.M. Park,et al.  Fusion Nuclear Science Facility (FNSF) before Upgrade to Component Test Facility (CTF) , 2010 .

[31]  I. Day,et al.  Real time neutral beam power control on MAST , 2011 .

[32]  R. Scannell,et al.  MAST YAG Thomson scattering upgrade alignment system. , 2010, The Review of scientific instruments.

[33]  A. Schekochihin,et al.  Transport bifurcation in a rotating tokamak plasma. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[34]  T. C. Hender,et al.  Spherical tokamak volume neutron source , 1999 .

[35]  D. Ryutov Geometrical Properties of a "Snow-Flake" Divertor , 2007 .

[36]  Yueqiang Liu,et al.  The effect of energetic particles on resistive wall mode stability in MAST , 2011 .

[37]  Experts,et al.  Experimental investigation and validation of neutral beam current drive for ITER through ITPA Joint Experiments , 2011 .

[38]  P. J. Knight,et al.  Conceptual design of a component test facility based on the spherical tokamak , 2008 .

[39]  Y. Camenen,et al.  Gyrokinetic simulations of spherical tokamaks , 2009 .

[40]  R. J. Akers,et al.  Spherical tokamaks: Present status and role in the development of fusion power , 2005 .

[41]  A. Field,et al.  Avalanche photodiode based detector for beam emission spectroscopy. , 2010, The Review of scientific instruments.

[42]  Alice Ying,et al.  Results of an International Study on a High-Volume Plasma-Based Neutron Source for Fusion Blanket Development , 1996 .

[43]  P. Valanju,et al.  Super-X divertors and high power density fusion devices , 2009 .

[44]  A. Field,et al.  Saturated ideal modes in advanced tokamak regimes in MAST , 2010 .

[45]  K. J. Gibson,et al.  Characterisation of detached plasmas on the MAST Tokamak , 2011 .

[46]  C. Roach,et al.  Plasma rotation and transport in MAST spherical tokamak , 2011 .

[47]  Keith H. Burrell,et al.  Edge stability and transport control with resonant magnetic perturbations in collisionless tokamak plasmas , 2006 .

[48]  A. Field,et al.  Beam emission spectroscopy for density turbulence measurements on the MAST spherical tokamak. , 2009, The Review of scientific instruments.

[49]  Faa Federico Felici,et al.  Snowflake divertor plasmas on TCV , 2009 .

[50]  G. A. Naylor,et al.  An FPGA based control unit for synchronization of laser Thomson scattering measurements to plasma events on MAST , 2010 .

[51]  G. Fishpool,et al.  MAST upgrade closed pumped divertor design and analysis , 2011 .

[52]  David Taylor,et al.  MAST's Integrated Data Access Management system: IDAM , 2008 .

[53]  P T Lang,et al.  First observation of edge localized modes mitigation with resonant and nonresonant magnetic perturbations in ASDEX Upgrade. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[54]  M. Wisse,et al.  Collisionality and safety factor scalings of H-mode energy transport in the MAST spherical tokamak , 2011 .

[55]  Y. Kamada,et al.  Comparison of the spatial and temporal structure of type-I ELMs , 2008 .

[56]  G. Tallents,et al.  New physics capabilities from the upgraded Thomson scattering diagnostic on MAST , 2010 .