Enjoyment and social influence: predicting mobile payment adoption

Models of technology adoption, notably the Technology Acceptance Model and the Unified Theories of Acceptance and Use of Technology, provide good theoretical foundations for understanding mobile payment adoption. This study extends these frameworks by incorporating perceived enjoyment, social influence, knowledge and perceived risk. Replications of established theories are tested in a new context of young people's adoption of mobile payment. Subsequent hypotheses test an extended theoretical framework using an online survey (N = 316). The extended model improves previous models by explaining 62% of variation in intention to use. Against expectations, perceived ease of use had no significant effect on perceived usefulness and intention to use. The study contributes to advancing understanding of perceived enjoyment which had no direct effect on adoption intention but a significant effect on perceived ease of use and usefulness. Social influence reduces perceived risk, and further contribution is made by noting that perceived enjoyment lowers perceived risk.

[1]  Wadie Nasri,et al.  EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF INTERNET BANKING ADOPTION IN TUNISIA , 2014 .

[2]  Kai-Ying Chen,et al.  User acceptance of ‘near field communication’ mobile phone service: an investigation based on the ‘unified theory of acceptance and use of technology’ model , 2013 .

[3]  Tao Zhou,et al.  An empirical examination of continuance intention of mobile payment services , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[4]  Shu-Fang Liu,et al.  An integrated attitude model of self-service technologies: evidence from online stock trading systems brokers , 2012 .

[5]  A. Keramati,et al.  A combinative model of behavioural and technical factors affecting ‘Mobile’-payment services adoption: an empirical study , 2012 .

[6]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2012, MIS Q..

[7]  Luzhuang Wang,et al.  The Impact of Use Context on Mobile Payment Acceptance: An Empirical Study in China , 2012 .

[8]  Rui Zhang,et al.  Mobile payment services adoption across time: An empirical study of the effects of behavioral beliefs, social influences, and personal traits , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  Shuiqing Yang,et al.  Dynamics between the trust transfer process and intention to use mobile payment services: A cross-environment perspective , 2011, Inf. Manag..

[10]  Sergios Dimitriadis,et al.  The effect of trust, channel technology, and transaction type on the adoption of self-service bank channels , 2011 .

[11]  Dong-Hee Shin,et al.  Modeling the Interaction of Users and Mobile Payment System: Conceptual Framework , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  In Lee,et al.  An empirical examination of factors influencing the intention to use mobile payment , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[13]  Bernd W. Wirtz,et al.  Understanding consumer acceptance of mobile payment services: An empirical analysis , 2010, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[14]  A. Palmer,et al.  Predicting young consumers' take up of mobile banking services , 2010 .

[15]  Dong-Hee Shin,et al.  Towards an understanding of the consumer acceptance of mobile wallet , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[16]  Hao Zhou,et al.  Smart phone for mobile commerce , 2009, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[17]  Tomi Dahlberg,et al.  Past, present and future of mobile payments research: A literature review , 2008, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[18]  Michał Polasik,et al.  Empirical Analysis of Internet Banking Adoption in Poland , 2008 .

[19]  Hanudin Amin.  Factors affecting the intentions of customers in Malaysia to use mobile phone credit cards , 2008 .

[20]  Eze Uchenna Cyril,et al.  Modelling User Trust and Mobile Payment Adoption: A Conceptual Framework , 2008 .

[21]  David Meyer,et al.  The role of perceived enjoyment and social norm in the adoption of technology with network externalities , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Lei da Chen,et al.  A model of consumer acceptance of mobile payment , 2008, Int. J. Mob. Commun..

[23]  Jamie Murphy,et al.  The moderating influence of hedonic consumption in an extended theory of planned behaviour , 2009 .

[24]  Dong Hee Shin,et al.  User acceptance of mobile Internet: Implication for convergence technologies , 2007, Interact. Comput..

[25]  Chin-Lung Hsu,et al.  Consumer behavior in online game communities: A motivational factor perspective , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Quo vadis TAM? , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Sumeet Gupta,et al.  Value-based Adoption of Mobile Internet: An empirical investigation , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[28]  Rajagopal Raghunathan,et al.  Is Happiness Shared Doubled and Sadness Shared Halved? Social Influence on Enjoyment of Hedonic Experiences , 2006 .

[29]  Timo Koivumäki,et al.  Predicting consumer acceptance in mobile services: empirical evidence from an experimental end user environment , 2006, Int. J. Mob. Commun..

[30]  Jen-Her Wu,et al.  What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[31]  Dena S Cox,et al.  Reassessing the pleasures of store shopping , 2005 .

[32]  Per E. Pedersen,et al.  Mobilizing the Brand , 2005 .

[33]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems , 2004, MIS Q..

[34]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Adoption of WAP-enabled mobile phones among Internet users , 2003 .

[35]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[36]  K. Keeling,et al.  Using ZMET to explore barriers to the adoption of 3G mobile banking services , 2003 .

[37]  Alan I. Wilson,et al.  Internet based marketing research: a serious alternative to traditional research methods? , 2003 .

[38]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Predicting E-Services Adoption: A Perceived Risk Facets Perspective , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[39]  Marios Koufaris,et al.  Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  Won Jun Lee,et al.  User Acceptance of the Mobile Internet , 2002 .

[41]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage , 2000, MIS Q..

[42]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[43]  D. Gefen,et al.  E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust , 2000 .

[44]  Anthony D. Miyazaki,et al.  Internet Privacy and Security: An Examination of Online Retailer Disclosures , 2000 .

[45]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[46]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage , 1999 .

[47]  K. Fang,et al.  An Analysis of Electronic-Mail Usage. , 1998 .

[48]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[49]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test† , 1996 .

[50]  Christian Homburg,et al.  Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review , 1996 .

[51]  Mark Keil,et al.  Usefulness and ease of use: field study evidence regarding task considerations , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[52]  V. Mitchell,et al.  Risk Perception and Reduction in the Purchase of Consumer Services , 1993 .

[53]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1 , 1992 .

[54]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[55]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[56]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[57]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[58]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[59]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[60]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[61]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[62]  W. D. Perreault.  CONTROLLING ORDER-EFFECT BIAS , 1975 .

[63]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[64]  R. S. Hancock.  Dynamic marketing for a changing world : proceedings of the 43rd National Conference of the American Marketing Assocation, June 15, 16, 17, 1960 , 1960 .

[65]  Richard,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace , 2022 .