Degree of conversion, depth of cure, and color stability of experimental dental composite formulated with camphorquinone and phenanthrenequinone photoinitiators.

PURPOSE This study evaluated the applicability of 9,10-phenanthrenequinone (PQ) in experimental dental composites. MATERIALS Camphorquinone (CQ), PQ, ethyl 4-N,N-dimethylaminobenzoate (EDMAB) and diphenyliodonium salt (DPI) were employed. A mixture of 2,2-bis(4-[2-hydroxy-3-methacryloxypropoxy]phenyl)-propane/triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (60:40%) and silanated glass filler at 60% were used. A two-peak-based light-emitting diode (LED) was used. METHODS The photoinitiator absorption and the light emission spectra were determined by a Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy and a spectroradiometer, respectively. Relative photon absorption (RPabs) was calculated. Fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy analysis was used to determine the degree of conversion (DC). The optical properties were determined with a spectrophotometer. Depth of cure was assessed from adapted International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 4049. Results were analyzed with descriptive analysis, analysis of variance, and Tukey's test (α = 5%). RESULTS PQ showed higher RPabs than CQ. Regarding the DC, CQ + EDMAB (control), CQ + EDMAB + DPI, PQ + DPI, and PQ + EDMAB + DPI produced statistically similar results. Groups formulated with CQ presented higher depth of cure. Only the group formulated with CQ + EDMAB presented satisfactory color stability (ΔE < 3.3). CONCLUSION PQ presented higher RPabs than CQ and it was able to produce DC similar to CQ + EDMAB, when used with DPI. However, groups formulated with PQ produced lower depth of cure, greater yellowing, and less color stability than the traditional combination CQ and amine. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Although research with novel photoinitiator systems should be encouraged, the traditional camphorquinone and amine pair remains as a reliable combination for the formulation of dental composites.

[1]  K. Hsu,et al.  Influence of fabrication conditions on characteristics of phenanthrenequinone-doped poly(methyl methacrylate) photopolymer for holographic memory , 2014 .

[2]  R. Moraes,et al.  Color stability, conversion, water sorption and solubility of dental composites formulated with different photoinitiator systems. , 2013, Journal of dentistry.

[3]  S. Prahl,et al.  Curing efficiency of dental resin composites formulated with camphorquinone or trimethylbenzoyl-diphenyl-phosphine oxide. , 2012, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[4]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Self-adhesive resin cements - chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. , 2011, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[5]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Photoinitiator type and applicability of exposure reciprocity law in filled and unfilled photoactive resins. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[6]  Jack L Ferracane,et al.  Resin composite--state of the art. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[7]  Dongkwan Kim,et al.  A photo‐oxidizable kinetic pathway of three‐component photoinitiator systems containing porphrin dye (Zn‐tpp), an electron donor and diphenyl iodonium salt , 2009 .

[8]  Shiuan Huei Lin,et al.  Phenanthrenequinone-doped copolymers for holographic data storage , 2009 .

[9]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Effect of co-initiator ratio on the polymer properties of experimental resin composites formulated with camphorquinone and phenyl-propanedione. , 2009, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[10]  S. Prahl,et al.  Influence of photoinitiator type on the rate of polymerization, degree of conversion, hardness and yellowing of dental resin composites. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[11]  Xinglin Guo,et al.  Effects of water content and initiator composition on photopolymerization of a model BisGMA/HEMA resin. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[12]  L. F. Schneider,et al.  Effect of time and polymerization cycle on the degree of conversion of a resin composite. , 2006, Operative dentistry.

[13]  Carla C Schmitt,et al.  The initiating radical yields and the efficiency of polymerization for various dental photoinitiators excited by different light curing units. , 2006, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[14]  J. Stansbury Curing dental resins and composites by photopolymerization. , 2000, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[15]  H R Rawls,et al.  Development of a new photoinitiation system for dental light-cure composite resins. , 1999, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[16]  K. Chae,et al.  Phenylpropanedione: A New Visible-Light Photosensitizer for Dental Composite Resin with Higher Efficiency than Camphorquinone , 1998 .

[17]  W. Cook Factors Affecting the Depth of Cure of UV -polymerized Composites , 1980, Journal of dental research.