Understanding sales force automation outcomes: A managerial perspective

Abstract Despite the growing importance and potential of sales force automation (SFA), failure rates for SFA implementations have been reported to be as high as 55–80%. Given the growth of SFA programs, the potential effectiveness and efficiency SFA can bring to the sales force, and the magnitude of SFA failures, it is surprising that relatively few studies have addressed this important and timely topic. Many of the early studies have focused on the adoption and diffusion/infusion of SFA programs from an information technology perspective. The results of these studies have been inconclusive in explaining SFA implementation failures. The purpose of this study is to add to our understanding of SFA failures by investigating a broader set of implementation factors than those typically included in acceptance of technology studies. We conducted in-depth personal interviews with executives from three global organizations who were responsible for SFA initiatives in their firm. Results from the in-depth analyses yield recommendations and a proposed model to assist managers in the implementation of their SFA as well as getting their salespeople to “buy-in” to the SFA, and ultimately reduce SFA failures.

[1]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[2]  Sudha Ram,et al.  Bringing Innovation to Market: How To Break Corporate and Customer Barriers , 1987 .

[3]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[4]  Charles E. Pettijohn,et al.  Salesforce automation issues prior to implementation: the relationship between attitudes toward technology, experience and productivity , 1997 .

[5]  Mark Leach,et al.  Theory Testing Using Case Studies in Business-to-Business Research , 1999 .

[6]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[7]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Personal selling and sales management: A relationship marketing perspective , 1999 .

[8]  K. Eisenhardt Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[9]  Scott m. Widmier,et al.  Infusing Technology into Personal Selling , 2002 .

[10]  C. Speier,et al.  The Hidden Minefields in the Adoption of Sales Force Automation Technologies , 2002 .

[11]  John E. G. Bateson,et al.  Exploring Complex Decision Making Units: A New Approach , 1982 .

[12]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[13]  Madhavan Parthasarathy,et al.  Salesforce automation and the adoption of technological innovations by salespeople: Theory and implications , 1997 .

[14]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  L. Phillips Assessing Measurement Error in Key Informant Reports: A Methodological Note on Organizational Analysis in Marketing , 1981 .

[16]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .