Event paths, conflation, argument structure, and VP shells

I discuss the semantics and syntax of a phenomenon often called lexical subordination and here called conflation, in which a VP with a single verb expresses both an activity and a result predication, although only the former is licensed by the verb's permanent lexical entry. Alongside standard cases such as resultatives and particle verbs, I discuss what I call event-path structures in English and German. In these, an activity is argued to conflate with a predication expressing a (sometimes metaphoric) path of the activity. These little-known data challenge many argument-structure theories because the path expressions sometimes disallow the linking of the verb's normal object. They require a theory where the lexical verb does not contribute arguments in conflation structures, a conclusion motivated empirically. I present a theory of syntax-semantics mapping which relies on VP shells with meaningful light verbs which constrain the interpretations of their specifiers and complements. Conflation is treated as compounding of a verb root to one of the light verbs. This accounts simply for the argument-structural patterns of resultatives and event-path structures. None of the argumentation appeals to operations at a lexical-semantic level between conceptual structure and syntax.

[1]  H. Harley Subjects, events, and licensing , 1995 .

[2]  Dieter Wunderlich,et al.  Cause and the structure of verbs , 1997 .

[3]  Ray Jackendoff TWISTIN' THE NIGHT AWAY , 1997 .

[4]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  Verb-Particle Explorations , 2002 .

[5]  G. Legendre SECONDARY PREDICATION AND FUNCTIONAL PROJECTIONS IN FRENCH , 1997 .

[6]  ANDREW SPENCER,et al.  Verb prefixation in Russian as lexical subordination , 1998 .

[7]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  Event semantics in the lexicon-syntax interface , 2000 .

[8]  Hagit Borer,et al.  The VP within Process Nominals: Evidence from Adverbs and the VP Anaphor Do-So , 2001 .

[9]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure , 1997 .

[10]  Nicole Dehé,et al.  Particle Verbs in English: Syntax, information structure and intonation , 2002 .

[11]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  English particle constructions, the lexicon, and the autonomy of syntax , 2002 .

[12]  T. Hoekstra,et al.  Aspect and Theta Theory , 1992 .

[13]  Barbara Stiebels,et al.  Lexikalische Argumente und Adjunkte : zum semantischen Beitrag von verbalen Präfixen und Partikeln , 1996 .

[14]  Malka Rappaport Hovav,et al.  An Event Structure Account of English Resultatives , 2001 .

[15]  William Snyder,et al.  On the Nature of Syntactic Variation: Evidence from Complex Predicates and Complex Word-Formation , 2001 .

[16]  R. Larson On the double object construction , 1988 .

[17]  A. Kratzer Severing the External Argument from its Verb , 1996 .

[18]  Ray Jackendoff Semantics and Cognition , 1983 .

[19]  E. Williams,et al.  On the definition of word , 1987 .

[20]  Andrew Mclntyre,et al.  Idiosyncrasy in particle verbs , 2002 .

[21]  Ken Hale,et al.  On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations , 1993 .

[22]  M. R. Manzini Learnability and Cognition , 1991 .

[23]  Jochen Zeller,et al.  Particle verbs and local domains , 2001 .

[24]  David R. Dowty Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in M , 1979 .

[25]  R. Jackendoff The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps even quantification in english , 1996 .

[26]  T. Hoekstra,et al.  UNERGATIVES AS COPULAR VERBS; LOCATIONAL AND EXISTENTIAL PREDICATION , 1990 .

[27]  John Bowers The syntax of predication , 1993 .

[28]  Andew McIntyre,et al.  Preverbs, argument linking and verb semantics: Germanic prefixes and particles , 2003 .

[29]  Juan Uriagereka Rhyme and reason , 1998 .

[30]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[31]  Fred Weerman,et al.  The balance between syntax and morphology: Dutch particles and resultatives , 1993 .

[32]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  The syntax of event structure , 1991, Cognition.

[33]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Word Meaning and Montague Grammar , 1979 .

[34]  Henk van Riemsdijk,et al.  The unbearable lightness of GOing: The projection parameter as a pure parameter governing the distribution of elliptic motion verbs in Germanic , 2002 .

[35]  J. Randall,et al.  The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives , 1992 .

[36]  Dieter Wunderlich,et al.  Argument Extension by Lexical Adjunction , 1997, J. Semant..

[37]  Carol Lee Tenny,et al.  Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface , 1994 .

[38]  Teun Hoekstra,et al.  Small clause results , 1988 .

[39]  A. Sorace,et al.  Gradient auxiliary selection and impersonal passivization in German: an experimental investigation , 2003 .

[40]  Yafei Li,et al.  Cross-Componential Causativity , 1999 .

[41]  Ingrid Kaufmann,et al.  O- and D-Predicates: A Semantic Approach to the Unaccusative-Unergative Distinction , 1995, J. Semant..

[42]  Susanne Winkler,et al.  Focus and secondary predication , 1996 .

[43]  H. Haider,et al.  Precedence among predicates , 1997 .

[44]  Van Valin,et al.  Semantic Parameters of Split Intransitivity , 1990 .

[45]  Carlota S. Smith,et al.  The Parameter of Aspect , 1991 .

[46]  G. Cinque Adverbs and functional heads , 1999 .

[47]  Ingrid Kaufmann Konzeptuelle Grundlagen semantischer Dekompositionsstrukturen , 1995 .

[48]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  The Different Readings of Wieder 'Again': A Structural Account , 1996, J. Semant..