Effects of advanced injection strategies on the in-cylinder air–fuel homogeneity of diesel engines

The air–fuel mixing quality in the combustion chamber of a diesel engine is very critical for controlling the ignition and the combustion quality of direct-injection diesel engines. With a view to understanding the air–fuel mixing behaviour and the effect of the mixture quality on the emissions formation, an innovative approach with a new quantitative factor of the in-cylinder air–fuel homogeneity, called the homogeneity factor, was used, and its characteristics under various injection conditions were analysed with computational fluid dynamics simulations. By investigating the effect of advanced injection strategies on the homogeneity of the mixture and the emissions production, the study suggested that the homogeneity factor is greatly affected by the pulse number of injections, the injection timing and the dwell angle between two injections. The more advanced the injection taking place in the cylinder, the earlier the air–fuel mixing quality reaches a high level. Although the homogeneity factor is not sufficiently precise by itself to reflect the emissions formation, the results demonstrated that most often, the higher the homogeneity available in the cylinder, the more nitrogen oxides and the less soot were formed.

[1]  G. C. Mavropoulos,et al.  Effect of exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) temperature for various EGR rates on heavy duty DI diesel engine performance and emissions , 2008 .

[2]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Internal combustion engine fundamentals , 1988 .

[3]  Álvaro Díez Rodríguez Investigation of split injection in a single cylinder optical diesel engine , 2009 .

[4]  Naoki Shimazaki,et al.  Reduction of Diesel Engine NOx Using Pilot Injection , 1995 .

[5]  Rolf D. Reitz,et al.  Effects of Multiple Injections and Flexible Control of Boost and EGR on Emissions and Fuel Consumption of a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine , 2001 .

[6]  A. Benkenida,et al.  The 3-Zones Extended Coherent Flame Model (Ecfm3z) for Computing Premixed/Diffusion Combustion , 2004 .

[7]  Bin Liu,et al.  Analysis of Homogeneity Factor for Diesel PCCI Combustion Control , 2011 .

[8]  M. Hadžiabdić,et al.  A robust near-wall elliptic-relaxation eddy-viscosity turbulence model for CFD , 2004 .

[9]  R. Reitz Modeling atomization processes in high-pressure vaporizing sprays , 1987 .

[10]  J. Dukowicz A particle-fluid numerical model for liquid sprays , 1980 .

[11]  Dominik Kuhnke,et al.  Spray / Wall-interaction Modelling by Dimensionless Data Analysis , 2004 .

[12]  Rolf D. Reitz,et al.  Reducing Particulate and NOx Emissions by Using Multiple Injections in a Heavy Duty D.I. Diesel Engine , 1994 .

[13]  H. Hiroyasu,et al.  EFFECTS OF CYLINDER TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE ON IGNITION DELAY IN DIRECT INJECTION DIESEL ENGINE , 1989 .

[14]  Sir William Thomson F.R.S. XLVI. Hydrokinetic solutions and observations , 1871 .

[15]  Raouf Mobasheri,et al.  Analysis the effect of advanced injection strategies on engine performance and pollutant emissions in a heavy duty DI-diesel engine by CFD modeling , 2012 .

[16]  Marco Badami,et al.  Influence of Injection Pressure on the Performance of a DI Diesel Engine with a Common Rail Fuel Injection System , 1999 .

[17]  K. Nishida,et al.  Simplified Three-Dimensional Modeling of Mixture Formation and Combustion in a D.I. Diesel Engine , 1989 .

[18]  Caroline L. Genzale,et al.  Effect of Ignition Delay on In-Cylinder Soot Characteristics of a Heavy Duty Diesel Engine Operating at Low Temperature Conditions , 2009 .

[19]  Rolf D. Reitz,et al.  Reducing Particulate and NOx Using Multiple Injections and EGR in a D.I. Diesel , 1995 .

[20]  John Abraham,et al.  Dependence of Fuel-Air Mixing Characteristics on Injection Timing in an Early-Injection Diesel Engine , 2002 .