Development of a Low-Cost Internet-of-Things (IoT) System for Monitoring Soil Water Potential Using Watermark 200SS Sensors

Soil moisture monitoring is one of the methods that farmers can use for irrigation scheduling. Many sensor types and data logging systems have been developed for this purpose over the years, but their widespread adoption in practical irrigation scheduling is still limited due to a variety of factors. Important factors limiting adoption of soil moisture sensing technology by farmers include high cost and difficulties in timely data collection and interpretation. Recent developments in open source microcontrollers (such as Arduino), wireless communication, and Internet-of-Things (IoT) technologies offer opportunities for reducing cost and facilitating timely data collection, visualization, and interpretation for farmers. Therefore, the objective of this study was to develop and test a low-cost IoT system for soil moisture monitoring using Watermark 200SS sensors. The system uses Arduino-based microcontrollers and data from the field sensors (End Nodes) are communicated wirelessly using LoRa radios to a receiver (Coordinator), which connects to the Internet via WiFi and sends the data to an open-source website (ThingSpeak.com) where the data can be visualized and further analyzed using Matlab. The system was successfully tested under field conditions by installing Watermark sensors at four depths in a wheat field. The system described here could contribute to widespread adoption of easy-to-use and affordable moisture sensing technologies among farmers.

[1]  S. Idso,et al.  Wheat canopy temperature: A practical tool for evaluating water requirements , 1977 .

[2]  Charles A. Shapiro,et al.  Large-scale on-farm implementation of soil moisture-based irrigation management strategies for increasing maize water productivity , 2012 .

[3]  D. F. Wanjura,et al.  Canopy temperature characterizations of corn and cotton water status. , 2000 .

[4]  Sherwood B. Idso,et al.  Non-water-stressed baselines: A key to measuring and interpreting plant water stress , 1982 .

[5]  R. G. Evans,et al.  Evaluation of Closed-Loop Site-Specific Irrigation with Wireless Sensor Network , 2009 .

[6]  Daniel K. Fisher,et al.  Open-Source Hardware Is a Low-Cost Alternative for Scientific Instrumentation and Research , 2012 .

[7]  Calvin D. Perry,et al.  A real-time wireless smart sensor array for scheduling irrigation , 2008 .

[8]  Daniel K. Fisher Rapid Deployment of Internet-Connected Environmental Monitoring Devices , 2014, IOT 2014.

[9]  D. F. Wanjura,et al.  Irrigation Starting Time Effects on Cotton under High-Frequency Irrigation , 1996 .

[10]  S. Irmak,et al.  Variable upper and lower crop water stress index baselines for corn and soybean , 2006, Irrigation Science.

[11]  M. P. Bange,et al.  HydroLOGIC: An irrigation management system for Australian cotton , 2008 .

[12]  José O. Payero,et al.  AQUAMAN: a web-based decision support system for irrigation scheduling in peanuts , 2011, Irrigation Science.

[13]  Chi Harold Liu,et al.  The Emerging Internet of Things Marketplace From an Industrial Perspective: A Survey , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing.

[14]  José O. Payero,et al.  Non-water-stressed baselines for calculating crop water stress index (CWSI) for alfalfa and tall fescue grass , 2005 .

[15]  D. F. Wanjura,et al.  Crop Water Status Control With Temperature-Time Threshold Irrigation , 2003 .

[16]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements , 1998 .