Response to W. Kramer: The human sex odds at birth after the atmospheric atomic bomb tests, after Chernobyl, and in the vicinity of nuclear facilities: comment (doi:10.1007/s11356-011-0644-8)

IntroductionThis paper is in response to criticism of our article “The human sex odds at birth after the atmospheric atomic bomb tests, after Chernobyl, and in the vicinity of nuclear facilities” published in Environ Sci Pollut Res 18(5):697–707, 2011.MethodsOur findings and methods concerning the disturbed human sex odds at birth have been criticized in this journal for being artifacts of data mining, that the concept of statistical significance was misunderstood, and that confounding factors have not been accounted for. Here, we show that this criticism has no basis. We applied well-established statistical methods to large official data sets, and confounding is less important at the level of secular sex odds trends in aggregated annual figures from countries or continents.Results and conclusionsMoreover, our results are strengthened by recent findings concerning increased infant death sex odds in Germany and increased Down syndrome prevalence at birth across Europe after Chernobyl. Prompted by our studies, an official investigation in Lower Saxony, Germany, by the “Niedersächsisches Landesgesundheitsamt (NLGA)” confirmed our observation of severely escalated sex odds within 40 km distance from the nuclear storage site in Gorleben, Germany.

[1]  Walter Krämer,et al.  The human sex odds at birth after the atmospheric atomic bomb tests, after Chernobyl, and in the vicinity of nuclear facilities: comment , 2012, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[2]  J. Przyborowski,et al.  Homogeneity of results in testing samples from Poisson series, with an application to testing clover seed for dodder. , 1940 .

[3]  P. Eloundou-Enyegue,et al.  Demographic transitions and childrens resources: Bonus or divergence? , 2007 .

[4]  J. Bonde,et al.  Infant feeding and HIV , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  V. P. Mashkovich,et al.  Skyshine from photon radiation , 1989 .

[6]  E. L. Lehmann,et al.  Testing Statistical Hypotheses , 1962 .

[7]  A. Lerchl,et al.  Seasonality of sex ratio in Germany. , 1998, Human reproduction.

[8]  Kristina Voigt,et al.  Analytical ecological epidemiology: exposure–response relations in spatially stratified time series , 2009 .

[9]  Denis Hémon,et al.  Childhood leukemia around French nuclear power plants: The geocap study, 2002–2007. Responses to letters , 2012 .

[10]  Kristina Voigt,et al.  Is the human sex odds at birth distorted in the vicinity of nuclear facilities (NF)? A preliminary geo-spatial-temporal approach , 2010, EnviroInfo.

[11]  Hagen Scherb,et al.  Evidence for an increase in trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) in Europe after the Chernobyl reactor accident , 2012, Genetic epidemiology.

[12]  Kristina Voigt,et al.  The human sex odds at birth after the atmospheric atomic bomb tests, after Chernobyl, and in the vicinity of nuclear facilities , 2011, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[13]  A Hemprich,et al.  Spaltgeburtenrate der ehemaligen DDR vor und nach dem Reaktorunfall in Tschernobyl , 1999, Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie.

[14]  Denis Hémon,et al.  Childhood leukemia around French nuclear power plants—The geocap study, 2002–2007 , 2012, International journal of cancer.

[15]  R. Bertollini,et al.  Declining Trends of Male Proportion at Birth in Europe , 2001, Archives of environmental health.

[16]  V. Nesterenko,et al.  8. Atmospheric, water, and soil contamination after Chernobyl. , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[17]  H. Scherb,et al.  [Cleft lip and cleft palate birth rate in Bavaria before and after the Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident]. , 2004, Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie : MKG.

[18]  L. Vatten,et al.  The human sex ratio: effects of maternal age. , 2012, Human reproduction.

[19]  A. Hemprich,et al.  Spaltgeburtenrate der ehemaligen DDR vor und nach dem Reaktorunfall in Tschernobyl , 1999, Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie.

[20]  E. Lehmann.  Testing Statistical Hypotheses , 1960 .

[21]  Maria Blettner,et al.  Case-control study on childhood cancer in the vicinity of nuclear power plants in Germany 1980-2003. , 2008, European journal of cancer.

[22]  Michele Marcus,et al.  Can environmental or occupational hazards alter the sex ratio at birth? A systematic review , 2011, Emerging health threats journal.

[23]  Dr. rer. nat. Dipl. Math. H. Scherb,et al.  Spaltgeburtenrate in Bayern vor und nach dem Reaktorunfall in Tschernobyl , 2004, Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie.

[24]  W. James,et al.  Evidence that mammalian sex ratios at birth are partially controlled by parental hormone levels around the time of conception. , 2008, The Journal of endocrinology.

[25]  B. Hamilton,et al.  Trend analysis of the sex ratio at birth in the United States. , 2005, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.