Habitat differences influence genetic impacts of human land use on the American beech (Fagus grandifolia).

Natural reforestation after regional forest clearance is a globally common land-use sequence. The genetic recovery of tree populations in these recolonized forests may depend on the biogeographic setting of the landscape, for instance whether they are in the core or in the marginal part of the species' range. Using data from 501 individuals genotyped across 7 microsatellites, we investigated whether regional differences in habitat quality affected the recovery of genetic variation in a wind-pollinated tree species, American beech (Fagus grandifolia) in Massachusetts. We compared populations in forests that were recolonized following agricultural abandonment to those in remnant forests that have only been logged in both central inland and marginal coastal regions. Across all populations in our entire study region, recolonized forests showed limited reduction of genetic diversity as only observed heterozygosity was significantly reduced in these forests (H(O) = 0.520 and 0.590, respectively). Within inland region, this pattern was observed, whereas in the coast, recolonized populations exhibited no reduction in all genetic diversity estimates. However, genetic differentiation among recolonized populations in marginal coastal habitat increased (F(st) logged = 0.072; F(st) secondary = 0.249), with populations showing strong genetic structure, in contrast to inland region. These results indicate that the magnitude of recovery of genetic variation in recolonized populations can vary at different habitats.

[1]  R. Petit,et al.  Stronger spatial genetic structure in recolonized areas than in refugia in the European beech , 2013, Molecular ecology.

[2]  T. Parchman,et al.  Development of genetic diversity, differentiation and structure over 500 years in four ponderosa pine populations , 2013, Molecular ecology.

[3]  P. Menozzi,et al.  Effect of habitat fragmentation on the genetic diversity and structure of peripheral populations of beech in Central Italy. , 2012, The Journal of heredity.

[4]  R. Vitalis,et al.  Inferring Population Decline and Expansion From Microsatellite Data: A Simulation-Based Evaluation of the Msvar Method , 2011, Genetics.

[5]  M. Ashley,et al.  Pollen-mediated gene flow in isolated and continuous stands of bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa (Fagaceae). , 2010, American journal of botany.

[6]  Sunshine L. Brosi,et al.  Range‐wide distribution of genetic diversity in the North American tree Juglans cinerea: a product of range shifts, not ecological marginality or recent population decline , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[7]  R. Frankham Challenges and opportunities of genetic approaches to biological conservation. , 2010 .

[8]  Ashley B. Morris,et al.  Reassessment of phylogeographical structure in an eastern North American tree using Monmonier’s algorithm and ecological niche modelling , 2010 .

[9]  B. Finegan,et al.  Genetic Consequences of Multigenerational and Landscape Colonisation Bottlenecks for a Neotropical Forest Pioneer Tree, Vochysia ferruginea , 2010, Tropical Plant Biology.

[10]  G. Vendramin,et al.  Genetic effects of chronic habitat fragmentation revisited: Strong genetic structure in a temperate tree, Taxus baccata (Taxaceae), with great dispersal capability. , 2010, American journal of botany.

[11]  Patrick J. McIntyre,et al.  Evolution and Ecology of Species Range Limits , 2009 .

[12]  G. Motzkin,et al.  Distribution and Dynamics of American Beech in Coastal Southern New England , 2009 .

[13]  D. Whigham,et al.  Demographic genetics of American beech (Fagus grandifolia Ehrh.) IV. Development of genetic variability and gene flow during succession in a coastal plain forest in Maryland , 2008 .

[14]  H. Howe,et al.  The Paradox of Forest Fragmentation Genetics , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[15]  A. Estoup,et al.  Do outbreaks affect genetic population structure? A worldwide survey in Locusta migratoria, a pest plagued by microsatellite null alleles , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[16]  D. Foster,et al.  The effect of logging on vegetation composition in Western Massachusetts , 2008 .

[17]  C. Eckert,et al.  Genetic variation across species’ geographical ranges: the central–marginal hypothesis and beyond , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[18]  K. Holsinger,et al.  Multigenerational genetic analysis of tropical secondary regeneration in a canopy palm. , 2007, Ecology.

[19]  Frédéric Guibal,et al.  Patterns of Land-use Abandonment Control Tree-recruitment and Forest Dynamics in Mediterranean Mountains , 2007, Ecosystems.

[20]  A. Estoup,et al.  Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. , 2007, Molecular biology and evolution.

[21]  Julia Koricheva,et al.  How general are positive relationships between plant population size, fitness and genetic variation? , 2006 .

[22]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  Genetic effects of chronic habitat fragmentation in a wind-pollinated tree. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Ellen G. Williamson-Natesan Comparison of methods for detecting bottlenecks from microsatellite loci , 2006, Conservation Genetics.

[24]  Charles H. W. Foster Forests in Time: The Environmental Consequences of 1,000 Years of Change in New England (review) , 2005, Journal of Interdisciplinary History.

[25]  James S. Clark,et al.  MOLECULAR INDICATORS OF TREE MIGRATION CAPACITY UNDER RAPID CLIMATE CHANGE , 2005 .

[26]  S. Kelley,et al.  Isolation by distance, web service , 2005, BMC Genetics.

[27]  S. Schneider,et al.  Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis , 2005, Evolutionary bioinformatics online.

[28]  M. Vellend PARALLEL EFFECTS OF LAND‐USE HISTORY ON SPECIES DIVERSITY AND GENETIC DIVERSITY OF FOREST HERBS , 2004 .

[29]  G. Hewitt The structure of biodiversity – insights from molecular phylogeography , 2004, Frontiers in Zoology.

[30]  J. Hamrick,et al.  Response of forest trees to global environmental changes , 2004 .

[31]  N. Holbrook,et al.  Restoration of genetic diversity in the dry forest tree Swietenia macrophylla (Meliaceae) after pasture abandonment in Costa Rica , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[32]  G. Vendramin,et al.  Characterisation of microsatellite markers in Fagus sylvatica L. and Fagus orientalis Lipsky , 2003 .

[33]  K. Edwards,et al.  Development and characterization of microsatellite markers in Castanea sativa (Mill.) , 2003, Molecular Breeding.

[34]  D. Foster,et al.  CONSERVATION OF CHANGING LANDSCAPES: VEGETATION AND LAND‐USE HISTORY OF CAPE COD NATIONAL SEASHORE , 2003 .

[35]  O. Hardy,et al.  spagedi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels , 2002 .

[36]  David R. Foster,et al.  Three hundred years of forest and land‐use change in Massachusetts, USA , 2002 .

[37]  G. Motzkin,et al.  The forests of presettlement New England, USA: spatial and compositional patterns based on town proprietor surveys , 2002 .

[38]  S. Kawano,et al.  Regional Differentiation in Genetic Components for the American Beech, Fagus grandifolia Ehrh., in Relation to Geological History and Mode of Reproduction , 2001, Journal of Plant Research.

[39]  J. Garza,et al.  Detection of reduction in population size using data from microsatellite loci , 2001, Molecular ecology.

[40]  A. Templeton,et al.  CORRELATION OF PAIRWISE GENETIC AND GEOGRAPHIC DISTANCE MEASURES: INFERRING THE RELATIVE INFLUENCES OF GENE FLOW AND DRIFT ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF GENETIC VARIABILITY , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[41]  P. Siikamäki,et al.  Genetic Diversity, Population Size, and Fitness in Central and Peripheral Populations of a Rare Plant Lychnis viscaria , 1999 .

[42]  T. Nakamura,et al.  Development and polymorphism of microsatellite markers for Fagus crenata and the closely related species, F. japonica , 1999, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[43]  N. J. Ouborg,et al.  Population genetics, molecular markers and the study of dispersal in plants , 1999 .

[44]  V. Sork,et al.  Landscape approaches to historical and contemporary gene flow in plants. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[45]  G. Luikart,et al.  Empirical Evaluation of a Test for Identifying Recently Bottlenecked Populations from Allele Frequency Data , 1998 .

[46]  R. Bacilieri,et al.  Chloroplast DNA footprints of postglacial recolonization by oaks. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  Nigel Maxted,et al.  Plant Genetic Conservation: The in situ approach , 1997 .

[48]  Peter Lesica,et al.  When Are Peripheral Populations Valuable for Conservation , 1995 .

[49]  François Rousset,et al.  GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetic software for exact tests and ecumenicism , 1995 .

[50]  David R. Foster,et al.  Land-Use History (1730-1990) and Vegetation Dynamics in Central New England, USA , 1992 .

[51]  R. Schaefer,et al.  Genetic structure after forest fragmentation: a landscape ecology perspective on Acer saccharum , 1992 .

[52]  W. Platt,et al.  Gap Light Regimes Influence Canopy Tree Diversity , 1989 .

[53]  M. Wade,et al.  EXTINCTION AND RECOLONIZATION: THEIR EFFECTS ON THE GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION OF LOCAL POPULATIONS , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[54]  S. Webb,et al.  Beech Range Extension and Vegetation History: Pollen Stratigraphy of Two Wisconsin Lakes. , 1987, Ecology.

[55]  W. C. Johnson,et al.  Dispersal of beech nuts by blue jays in fragmented landscapes. , 1985 .

[56]  D. Houston,et al.  Beech bark disease: patterns of spread and development of the initiating agent Cryptococcusfagisuga , 1979 .

[57]  R. T. Ward Some Aspects of Regeneration Habits of the American Beech , 1961 .

[58]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[59]  Volker C. Radeloff,et al.  Determinants of agricultural land abandonment in post-Soviet European Russia , 2011 .

[60]  J. Burczyk,et al.  Simultaneous estimation of null alleles and inbreeding coefficients. , 2009, The Journal of heredity.

[61]  R. Baucom,et al.  The effect of deforestation on the genetic diversity and structure in Acer saccharum (Marsh): Evidence for the loss and restructuring of genetic variation in a natural system , 2004, Conservation Genetics.

[62]  M. Sillanpää,et al.  Bayesian analysis of genetic differentiation between populations. , 2003, Genetics.

[63]  K. Pregitzer,et al.  A Comparison of Presettlement and Present-day Forests in Northeastern Lower Michigan , 2003 .

[64]  J. Goudet FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Updated from Goudet (1995) , 2001 .

[65]  M. Gillman Plant population ecology , 2000 .

[66]  David R. Foster,et al.  Land-Use History as Long-Term Broad-Scale Disturbance: Regional Forest Dynamics in Central New England , 1998, Ecosystems.

[67]  D. Foster,et al.  Impact of Human Activity on Regional Forest Composition and Dynamics in Central New England , 1998, Ecosystems.

[68]  C. Canham Suppression and release during canopy recruitment in Fagus grandifolia , 1990 .

[69]  M. B. Davis,et al.  Quaternary history and the stability of forest communities , 1981 .

[70]  E. Pahlich,et al.  A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue , 1980 .