Estimation of cell Young's modulus of adherent cells probed by optical and magnetic tweezers: influence of cell thickness and bead immersion.

A precise characterization of cell elastic properties is crucial for understanding the mechanisms by which cells sense mechanical stimuli and how these factors alter cellular functions. Optical and magnetic tweezers are micromanipulation techniques which are widely used for quantifying the stiffness of adherent cells from their response to an external force applied on a bead partially embedded within the cell cortex. However, the relationships between imposed external force and resulting bead translation or rotation obtained from these experimental techniques only characterize the apparent cell stiffness. Indeed, the value of the estimated apparent cell stiffness integrates the effect of different geometrical parameters, the most important being the bead embedding angle 2gamma, bead radius R, and cell height h. In this paper, a three-dimensional finite element analysis was used to compute the cell mechanical response to applied force in tweezer experiments and to explicit the correcting functions which have to be used in order to infer the intrinsic cell Young's modulus from the apparent elasticity modulus. Our analysis, performed for an extensive set of values of gamma, h, and R, shows that the most relevant parameters for computing the correcting functions are the embedding half angle gamma and the ratio h(u)/2R, where h(u) is the under bead cell thickness. This paper provides original analytical expressions of these correcting functions as well as the critical values of the cell thickness below which corrections of the apparent modulus are necessary to get an accurate value of cell Young's modulus. Moreover, considering these results and taking benefit of previous results obtained on the estimation of cell Young's modulus of adherent cells probed by magnetic twisting cytometry (MTC) (Ohayon, J., and Tracqui, P., 2005, Ann. Biomed. Eng., 33, pp. 131-141), we were able to clarify and to solve the still unexplained discrepancies reported between estimations of elasticity modulus performed on the same cell type and probed with MTC and optical tweezers (OT). More generally, this study may strengthen the applicability of optical and magnetic tweezers techniques by insuring a more precise estimation of the intrinsic cell Young's modulus (CYM).

[1]  G I Zahalak,et al.  Cell poking: quantitative analysis of indentation of thick viscoelastic layers. , 1989, Biophysical journal.

[2]  R M Nerem,et al.  Application of the micropipette technique to the measurement of cultured porcine aortic endothelial cell viscoelastic properties. , 1990, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[3]  N. Phan-Thien.  Rigid spherical inclusion: the multipole expansion , 1993 .

[4]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton , 1993 .

[5]  D E Ingber,et al.  Control of cytoskeletal mechanics by extracellular matrix, cell shape, and mechanical tension. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[6]  K. Svoboda,et al.  Biological applications of optical forces. , 1994, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[7]  D. Ingber,et al.  Probing transmembrane mechanical coupling and cytomechanics using magnetic twisting cytometry. , 1995, Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire.

[8]  R. Lal,et al.  Dynamic micromechanical properties of cultured rat atrial myocytes measured by atomic force microscopy. , 1995, The American journal of physiology.

[9]  J J Fredberg,et al.  Pharmacological activation changes stiffness of cultured human airway smooth muscle cells. , 1996, The American journal of physiology.

[10]  J. Butler,et al.  Cytoskeletal mechanics in confluent epithelial cells probed through integrins and E-cadherins. , 1997, The American journal of physiology.

[11]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Laser tweezers in cell biology , 1998 .

[12]  W. H. Goldmann,et al.  Differences in F9 and 5.51 cell elasticity determined by cell poking and atomic force microscopy , 1998, FEBS letters.

[13]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Laser tweezers in cell biology. Introduction. , 1998, Methods in cell biology.

[14]  C. Rotsch,et al.  Dimensional and mechanical dynamics of active and stable edges in motile fibroblasts investigated by using atomic force microscopy. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  O. Thoumine,et al.  Microplates: a new tool for manipulation and mechanical perturbation of individual cells. , 1999, Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods.

[16]  S. Hénon,et al.  A new determination of the shear modulus of the human erythrocyte membrane using optical tweezers. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[17]  E. Sackmann,et al.  Measurement of local viscoelasticity and forces in living cells by magnetic tweezers. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[18]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Implications of heterogeneous bead behavior on cell mechanical properties measured with magnetic twisting cytometry , 1999 .

[19]  J J Fredberg,et al.  Mechanical properties of cultured human airway smooth muscle cells from 0.05 to 0.4 Hz. , 2000, Journal of applied physiology.

[20]  J J Fredberg,et al.  Selected contribution: time course and heterogeneity of contractile responses in cultured human airway smooth muscle cells. , 2001, Journal of applied physiology.

[21]  D. Navajas,et al.  Scaling the microrheology of living cells. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[22]  J. Simeon,et al.  Direct measurement of the area expansion and shear moduli of the human red blood cell membrane skeleton. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[23]  J. Käs,et al.  The optical stretcher: a novel laser tool to micromanipulate cells. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[24]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Miroslav Zivkovic,et al.  A finite element model of cell deformation during magnetic bead twisting. , 2002, Journal of applied physiology.

[26]  Daniel Isabey,et al.  Assessment of mechanical properties of adherent living cells by bead micromanipulation: comparison of magnetic twisting cytometry vs optical tweezers. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[27]  Ferenc Horkay,et al.  Determination of elastic moduli of thin layers of soft material using the atomic force microscope. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[28]  Yiider Tseng,et al.  Micromechanical mapping of live cells by multiple-particle-tracking microrheology. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[29]  N. Caille,et al.  Contribution of the nucleus to the mechanical properties of endothelial cells. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  J. Simeon,et al.  Elasticity of the human red blood cell skeleton. , 2003, Biorheology.

[31]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Microrheology of human lung epithelial cells measured by atomic force microscopy. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[32]  E. Planus,et al.  Characterization of cytoskeleton mechanical properties and 3D-actin structure in twisted adherent epithelial cells. , 2003, Biorheology.

[33]  T C Lubensky,et al.  Microrheology, stress fluctuations, and active behavior of living cells. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[34]  Dimitrije Stamenović,et al.  A prestressed cable network model of the adherent cell cytoskeleton. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[35]  Richard T. Lee,et al.  A three-dimensional viscoelastic model for cell deformation with experimental verification. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[36]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Time scale and other invariants of integrative mechanical behavior in living cells. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[37]  J. Fredberg,et al.  Linearity and time-scale invariance of the creep function in living cells , 2004, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[38]  Jacques Ohayon,et al.  Analysis of nonlinear responses of adherent epithelial cells probed by magnetic bead twisting: A finite element model based on a homogenization approach. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[39]  Jacques Ohayon,et al.  Transmission of Mechanical Stresses within the Cytoskeleton of Adherent Cells: A Theoretical Analysis Based on a Multi-Component Cell Model , 2004, Acta biotheoretica.

[40]  F. Guilak,et al.  The role of the cytoskeleton in the viscoelastic properties of human articular chondrocytes. , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[41]  Martin Aepfelbacher,et al.  Microviscoelasticity of the apical cell surface of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) within confluent monolayers. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[42]  Ning Wang,et al.  Mechanical anisotropy of adherent cells probed by a three-dimensional magnetic twisting device. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[43]  S. Suresh,et al.  Nonlinear elastic and viscoelastic deformation of the human red blood cell with optical tweezers. , 2004, Mechanics & chemistry of biosystems : MCB.

[44]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Fractional Derivatives Embody Essential Features of Cell Rheological Behavior , 2003, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[45]  Ning Wang,et al.  Cytoskeletal mechanics in adherent human airway smooth muscle cells: probe specificity and scaling of protein-protein dynamics. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[46]  A. Richert,et al.  The dissipative contribution of myosin II in the cytoskeleton dynamics of myoblasts , 2005, European Biophysics Journal.

[47]  Johannes S Kanger,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Micro magnetic tweezers for nanomanipulation inside live cells , 2005 .

[48]  J. Simeon,et al.  Creep function of a single living cell. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[49]  D A Pink,et al.  Active microrheology of networks composed of semiflexible polymers: theory and comparison with simulations. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[50]  Jacques Ohayon,et al.  Computation of Adherent Cell Elasticity for Critical Cell-Bead Geometry in Magnetic Twisting Experiments , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[51]  Stefan Schinkinger,et al.  Optical rheology of biological cells. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[52]  D. Ingber,et al.  Cellular mechanotransduction: putting all the pieces together again , 2006, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[53]  F. Guilak,et al.  The Pericellular Matrix as a Transducer of Biomechanical and Biochemical Signals in Articular Cartilage , 2006, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[54]  Donald E. Ingber,et al.  Cellular adaptation to mechanical stress: role of integrins, Rho, cytoskeletal tension and mechanosensitive ion channels , 2006, Journal of Cell Science.

[55]  Thomas Boudou,et al.  An extended modeling of the micropipette aspiration experiment for the characterization of the Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio of adherent thin biological samples: numerical and experimental studies. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[56]  Stefan Schinkinger,et al.  Quantifying the contribution of actin networks to the elastic strength of fibroblasts. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[57]  Peter Salamon,et al.  A review and numerical assessment of the random walk particle tracking method. , 2006, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[58]  H. Kessler,et al.  Cellular unbinding forces of initial adhesion processes on nanopatterned surfaces probed with magnetic tweezers. , 2006, Nano letters.

[59]  Wojciech Strojny,et al.  Stiffness of normal and pathological erythrocytes studied by means of atomic force microscopy. , 2006, Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods.

[60]  H. Gregersen,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of isolated rat colon smooth muscle cells , 2006, Cell biology international.

[61]  S. Galiacy,et al.  Sensitivity of alveolar macrophages to substrate mechanical and adhesive properties. , 2006, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.