Constant strain accumulation rate between major earthquakes on the North Anatolian Fault

Earthquakes are caused by the release of tectonic strain accumulated between events. Recent advances in satellite geodesy mean we can now measure this interseismic strain accumulation with a high degree of accuracy. But it remains unclear how to interpret short-term geodetic observations, measured over decades, when estimating the seismic hazard of faults accumulating strain over centuries. Here, we show that strain accumulation rates calculated from geodetic measurements around a major transform fault are constant for its entire 250-year interseismic period, except in the ~10 years following an earthquake. The shear strain rate history requires a weak fault zone embedded within a strong lower crust with viscosity greater than ~1020 Pa s. The results support the notion that short-term geodetic observations can directly contribute to long-term seismic hazard assessment and suggest that lower-crustal viscosities derived from postseismic studies are not representative of the lower crust at all spatial and temporal scales.Accumulation of interseismic strain may now be constrained by satellite observations. Here, the authors show that strain accumulation rates on the North Anatolian Fault are constant for the interseismic period indicating that lower-crustal viscosities from postseismic studies are not representative.

[1]  B. Aktug,et al.  Deformation of Central Anatolia: GPS implications , 2013 .

[2]  T. Yamasaki,et al.  The crustal viscosity gradient measured from post-seismic deformation: A case study of the 1997 Manyi (Tibet) earthquake , 2012 .

[3]  Jonathan R Goodman,et al.  Ensemble samplers with affine invariance , 2010 .

[4]  C. Kreemer,et al.  Erratum to Revised Tectonic Forecast of Global Shallow Seismicity Based on Version 2.1 of the Global Strain Rate Map , 2015 .

[5]  Robert J. Geller,et al.  Why earthquake hazard maps often fail and what to do about it , 2012 .

[6]  T. Wright,et al.  Geodetic observations of postseismic creep in the decade after the 1999 Izmit earthquake, Turkey: Implications for a shallow slip deficit , 2016 .

[7]  R. Hanssen,et al.  Radar Interferometry with Public Domain Tools , 2004 .

[8]  Semih Ergintav,et al.  Izmit earthquake postseismic deformation and dynamics of the North Anatolian Fault Zone , 2009 .

[9]  J. C. Savage.  Viscoelastic‐coupling model for the earthquake cycle driven from below , 2000 .

[10]  J. Thepaut,et al.  The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system , 2011 .

[11]  Andrew Hooper,et al.  A multi‐temporal InSAR method incorporating both persistent scatterer and small baseline approaches , 2008 .

[12]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy , 1986 .

[13]  B. Meade,et al.  Inference of Multiple Earthquake‐Cycle Relaxation Timescales from Irregular Geodetic Sampling of Interseismic Deformation , 2013 .

[14]  Bertrand Meyer,et al.  Surface Rupture and Slip Distribution of the 12 November 1999 Düzce Earthquake (M 7.1), North Anatolian Fault, Bolu, Turkey , 2002 .

[15]  T. Wright,et al.  Statistical comparison of InSAR tropospheric correction techniques , 2015 .

[16]  J. C. Savage.  Equivalent strike‐slip earthquake cycles in half‐space and lithosphere‐asthenosphere earth models , 1990 .

[17]  E. Dunham,et al.  Earthquake cycle simulations with rate-and-state friction and power-law viscoelasticity , 2017 .

[18]  K. N. Dollman,et al.  - 1 , 1743 .

[19]  Z. Çakır,et al.  Extent and distribution of aseismic slip on the Ismetpaşa segment of the North Anatolian Fault (Turkey) from Persistent Scatterer InSAR , 2014 .

[20]  Tim J. Wright,et al.  Earthquake cycle deformation and the Moho: Implications for the rheology of continental lithosphere , 2013 .

[21]  R. Riva,et al.  Relating viscosities from postseismic relaxation to a realistic viscosity structure for the lithosphere , 2009 .

[22]  G. Çifçi,et al.  Steady late quaternary slip rate on the Cinarcik section of the North Anatolian fault near Istanbul, Turkey , 2013 .

[23]  Chris Marone,et al.  The effect of loading rate on static friction and the rate of fault healing during the earthquake cycle , 1998, Nature.

[24]  L. Reiter.  Earthquake Hazard Analysis: Issues and Insights , 1991 .

[25]  Geoffrey Blewitt,et al.  A geodetic plate motion and Global Strain Rate Model , 2014 .

[26]  J. C. Savage,et al.  Geodetic determination of relative plate motion in central California , 1973 .

[27]  T. Wright,et al.  Weak ductile shear zone beneath a major strike‐slip fault: Inferences from earthquake cycle model constrained by geodetic observations of the western North Anatolian Fault Zone , 2014 .

[28]  J. Avouac,et al.  Under the Hood of the Earthquake Machine: Toward Predictive Modeling of the Seismic Cycle , 2012, Science.

[29]  B. Parsons,et al.  Scaling of viscous shear zones with depth-dependent viscosity and power-law stress–strain-rate dependence , 2014 .

[30]  Tim J. Wright,et al.  The earthquake deformation cycle , 2016 .

[31]  Thomas A. Hennig,et al.  The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission , 2001, Digital Earth Moving.

[32]  T.J. Wright,et al.  The role of space-based observation in understanding and responding to active tectonics and earthquakes , 2016, Nature Communications.

[33]  James H. Dieterich,et al.  Progressive failure on the North Anatolian fault since 1939 by earthquake stress triggering , 1997 .

[34]  T. Wright,et al.  Constraining crustal velocity fields with InSAR for Eastern Turkey: Limits to the block‐like behavior of Eastern Anatolia , 2014 .

[35]  K. Priestley,et al.  New views on the structure and rheology of the lithosphere , 2008, Journal of the Geological Society.

[36]  E. Altunel,et al.  Paleoseismology of the North Anatolian Fault at Güzelköy (Ganos segment, Turkey): Size and recurrence time of earthquake ruptures west of the Sea of Marmara , 2012 .

[37]  B. Meade,et al.  A Comparison of Geodetic and Geologic Rates Prior to Large Strike‐Slip Earthquakes: A Diversity of Earthquake‐Cycle Behaviors? , 2017 .

[38]  J. Avouac,et al.  Millenary Mw > 9.0 earthquakes required by geodetic strain in the Himalaya , 2016 .

[39]  Y. Kagan,et al.  Implications of Geodetic Strain Rate for Future Earthquakes, with a Five-Year Forecast of M5 Earthquakes in Southern California , 2007 .

[40]  Demitris Paradissis,et al.  Global Positioning System constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus , 2000 .

[41]  Peter Bird,et al.  A Long-Term Forecast of Shallow Seismicity Based on the Global Strain Rate Map , 2010 .

[42]  D. Sandwell,et al.  Interseismic deformation and creep along the central section of the North Anatolian Fault (Turkey): InSAR observations and implications for rate‐and‐state friction properties , 2013 .

[43]  P. Rosen,et al.  Updated repeat orbit interferometry package released , 2004 .

[44]  Ross D. Hartleb,et al.  The Surface Rupture and Slip Distribution of the 17 August 1999 İzmit Earthquake (M 7.4), North Anatolian Fault , 2002 .

[45]  A. Hooper,et al.  Recent advances in SAR interferometry time series analysis for measuring crustal deformation , 2012 .

[46]  Nadia Lapusta,et al.  Deeper penetration of large earthquakes on seismically quiescent faults , 2016, Science.

[47]  Massimiliano Stucchi,et al.  Global Historical Earthquake Archive and Catalogue (1000-1903) , 2013 .

[48]  L. Montési.  Controls of shear zone rheology and tectonic loading on postseismic creep , 2004 .

[49]  Wayne Thatcher,et al.  Nonlinear strain buildup and the earthquake cycle on the San Andreas Fault , 1983 .

[50]  J. C. Savage,et al.  Asthenosphere readjustment and the earthquake cycle , 1978 .

[51]  Haluk Ozener,et al.  Seven years of postseismic deformation following the 1999, M = 7.4 and M = 7.2, Izmit-Düzce, Turkey earthquake sequence , 2009 .

[52]  Z. Çakır,et al.  Surface creep on the North Anatolian Fault at Ismetpasa, Turkey, 1944–2016 , 2016 .

[53]  T. Wright,et al.  Satellite geodetic imaging reveals internal deformation of western Tibet , 2012 .

[54]  P. Bird,et al.  Improving deformation models by discounting transient signals in geodetic data: 1. Concept and synthetic examples , 2016 .

[55]  W. Thatcher,et al.  Reconciling viscoelastic models of postseismic and interseismic deformation: Effects of viscous shear zones and finite length ruptures , 2015 .

[56]  P. Varga.  Geodetic Strain Observations and Return Period of the Strongest Earthquakes of a Given Seismic Source Zone , 2011 .

[57]  James F. Dolan,et al.  Viscoelastic Block Models of the North Anatolian Fault: A Unified Earthquake Cycle Representation of Pre‐ and Postseismic Geodetic Observations , 2017 .

[58]  Ekbal Hussain.  Mapping and modelling the spatial variation in strain accumulation along the North Anatolian Fault , 2016 .

[59]  Demitris Paradissis,et al.  GPS constraints on continental deformation in the Africa‐Arabia‐Eurasia continental collision zone and implications for the dynamics of plate interactions , 2005 .

[60]  Tim J. Wright,et al.  Interseismic strain accumulation across the central North Anatolian Fault from iteratively unwrapped InSAR measurements , 2016 .

[61]  Yuri Fialko,et al.  Dynamic models of interseismic deformation and stress transfer from plate motion to continental transform faults , 2012 .

[62]  A. Barka,et al.  Slip distribution along the North Anatolian fault associated with the large earthquakes of the period 1939 to 1967 , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[63]  T. Wright,et al.  Omori‐like decay of postseismic velocities following continental earthquakes , 2017 .