Abatement cost of embodied emissions of a residential building in Sweden

In 2010, the world’s buildings accounted for approximately 19% of all greenhouse gas emissions. These emissions stem from both the construction and operation of buildings. In recent years the carbon efficiency of energy sources and energy efficiency of new buildings has been improved in Sweden. Therefore, embodied emissions accounts for an increasing share of the life cycle emissions of new buildings. This study aims to asses the cost effectiveness in abatement of embodied emissions. This was done by assessing the embodied emissions of a case building and several conventional design measures along with the implication on production cost. It was found that many of the measures enabled cost effective carbon abatement. Embodied emissions could be reduced by 15% using cost neutral or nearly cost neutral measures. Abatements up to 18% were found cost effective in relation to abatement of carbon dioxide emissions in other sectors. Abatements up to 24% were possible with minor increases in total production cost (0.22%) even though some of the individual measures were found expensive in relation to abatement of carbon dioxide emissions in other sectors. Some measures entailed increased floor area that could potentially lead to economic gain where exterior area is a limiting factor. Acoustic requirements were found to be a limiting factor in abatement of embodied emissions.

[1]  Yutaka Goto,et al.  Factors for Eco-Efficiency Improvement of Thermal Insulation Materials , 2016 .

[2]  Gian Andrea Blengini,et al.  Energy-saving policies and low-energy residential buildings: an LCA case study to support decision makers in Piedmont (Italy) , 2010 .

[3]  E. Stehfest,et al.  RCP2.6: exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2°C , 2011 .

[4]  C. Taylor,et al.  Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change , 2006 .

[5]  Björn Berggren,et al.  LCE analysis of buildings - Taking the step towards Net Zero Energy Buildings , 2013 .

[6]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Building energy-efficiency standards in a life cycle primary energy perspective , 2011 .

[7]  Margaret Jollands,et al.  Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost implication of residential buildings - A review , 2015 .

[8]  Gregor Wernet,et al.  The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[9]  Catarina Thormark,et al.  A low energy building in a life cycle - its embodied energy, energy need for operation and recycling potential , 2002 .

[10]  Ravi Prakash,et al.  Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview , 2010 .

[11]  Aie,et al.  Energy Technology Perspectives 2012 , 2006 .

[12]  Sarel Lavy,et al.  Identification of parameters for embodied energy measurement: A literature review , 2010 .

[13]  Varun,et al.  Life cycle assessment of buildings: A review , 2011 .

[14]  Ignacio Zabalza Bribián,et al.  Life cycle assessment of building materials: Comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential , 2011 .

[15]  Anne Grete Hestnes,et al.  Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article , 2007 .

[16]  York Ostermeyer,et al.  Specific Barriers to Massive Scale Energetic Refurbishment for Sample Markets in Europe , 2015 .

[17]  Lei Xu,et al.  The life-cycle assessment of a single-storey retail building in Canada , 2012 .

[18]  G. Finnveden,et al.  Energy Use and Environmental Impacts of the Swedish Building and Real Estate Management Sector , 2011 .

[19]  R. Howarth,et al.  The Economics of 350: The Benefits and Costs of Climate Stabilization , 2009 .

[20]  H. Baumann,et al.  Illustrating limitations of energy studies of buildings with LCA and actor analysis , 2010 .

[21]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Life cycle primary energy use and carbon emission of an eight-storey wood-framed apartment building , 2010 .

[22]  John S. Monahan,et al.  An embodied carbon and energy analysis of modern methods of construction in housing: A case study us , 2011 .

[23]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review , 2014 .

[24]  E. Holleris Petersen,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of four multi-family buildings , 2001 .

[25]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Life cycle primary energy analysis of residential buildings , 2010 .

[26]  Michael D. Lepech,et al.  Application of life-cycle assessment to early stage building design for reduced embodied environmental impacts , 2013 .