Probabilistic risk analysis of process plants under seismic loading based on Monte Carlo simulations

Abstract The vulnerability of process plants to natural hazards has been demonstrated in the last decades by a number of catastrophic events. Unfortunately, despite the continuous evolution of the knowledge on this matter, there is a lack of widely accepted and standardized procedures to perform a risk assessment of process plants subjected to Na-Tech hazards. In this paper, a new tool for the probabilistic seismic risk assessment of process plants is thus proposed, based on Monte Carlo simulations. Starting from the seismic hazard curve of the site in which the plant is placed, a multi-level approach is proposed. In this approach, the first level is represented by the components seismically damaged, whereas the following levels are treated through a classical consequence analysis, including propagation of multiple simultaneous and interacting chains of accidents. This latter is applied through the definition, for all relevant equipment, of proper correspondences between structural damage (i.e., damage states) and loss of containment events. The procedure has been implemented in the software “PRIAMUS” (Probabilistic RIsk Assessment with Monte Carlo simulations of Process Plants Under Seismic Loading). By automatically generating samples of damage propagation chains, the risk of the plant can be easily quantified in terms of economic losses, content losses, damage propagations or final damage scenarios. The application to a petrochemical plant shows the potentiality of the method and envisages possible further evolutions.

[1]  Spyros A. Karamanos,et al.  Simplified Model for the Seismic Performance of Unanchored Liquid Storage Tanks , 2015 .

[2]  Joaquim Casal Fàbrega,et al.  A proposal of generic event trees and probabilities for the release of different types of hazardous materials , 2011 .

[3]  Enrico Zio,et al.  The Monte Carlo Simulation Method for System Reliability and Risk Analysis , 2012 .

[4]  Spyros A. Karamanos,et al.  Performance Criteria for Liquid Storage Tanks and Piping Systems Subjected to Seismic Loading , 2017 .

[5]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  A methodology for the quantitative risk assessment of major accidents triggered by seismic events. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[6]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Threshold values for domino effects caused by blast wave interaction with process equipment , 2004 .

[7]  Oreste S. Bursi,et al.  Probabilistic seismic analysis of an LNG subplant , 2017 .

[8]  Antonio Casimiro Caputo,et al.  Seismic Quantitative Risk Assessment of Process Plants Through Monte Carlo Simulations , 2016 .

[9]  Iunio Iervolino,et al.  Harmonized Approach To Stress Tests For Critical Infrastructures Against Natural Hazards (STREST) , 2017 .

[10]  Dirk P. Kroese,et al.  Simulation and the Monte Carlo method , 1981, Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics.

[11]  Ernesto Salzano,et al.  Risk assessment and early warning systems for industrial facilities in seismic zones , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  M. Sam Mannan,et al.  A stochastic approach for risk analysis in vapor cloud explosion , 2015 .

[13]  Ernesto Salzano,et al.  Quantitative risk analysis of oil storage facilities in seismic areas. , 2005, Journal of hazardous materials.

[14]  Ernesto Salzano,et al.  Seismic risk of atmospheric storage tanks in the framework of quantitative risk analysis , 2003 .

[15]  Jiang Juncheng,et al.  An improved probit method for assessment of domino effect to chemical process equipment caused by overpressure. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[16]  Tasneem Abbasi,et al.  A new method for assessing domino effect in chemical process industry. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[17]  Nicola Buratti,et al.  Dynamic buckling and seismic fragility of anchored steel tanks by the added mass method , 2014 .

[18]  Roberto W. Romeo Seismic Risk Analysis of an Oil-Gas Storage Plant , 2014 .

[19]  Heetae Kim,et al.  QRA considering multi-vessel failure scenarios due to a natural disaster – Lessons from Fukushima , 2016 .

[20]  Oreste S. Bursi,et al.  Seismic fragility analysis of steel storage tanks , 2015 .

[21]  Kooi Es,et al.  Evaluation of the Dutch QRA directives for storage and transportation of flammable liquids , 2009 .

[22]  Antonio Casimiro Caputo,et al.  On the Use of Proper Fragility Models for Quantitative Seismic Risk Assessment of Process Plants in Seismic Prone Areas , 2017 .

[23]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Surrogate Modeling for the Seismic Performance Assessment of Liquid Storage Tanks , 2017 .

[24]  Oreste S. Bursi,et al.  Seismic fragility analysis of elevated steel storage tanks supported by reinforced concrete columns , 2017 .

[25]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  FRAGILITY OF STANDARD INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURES BY A RESPONSE SURFACE BASED METHOD , 2004 .

[26]  Charles F. Richter,et al.  Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy, and acceleration , 1942 .

[27]  Hamid Sadegh-Azar,et al.  Probabilistic Seismic Analysis of Existing Industrial Facilities , 2014 .

[28]  Lionel Estel,et al.  Analysis of domino effect in the process industry using the event tree method , 2017 .

[29]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  SEISMIC FRAGILITY ASSESSMENT OF STEEL LIQUID STORAGE TANKS , 2015 .

[30]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Development of a framework for the risk assessment of Na-Tech accidental events , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[31]  Hope A. Seligson,et al.  Chemical Hazards, Mitigation and Preparedness in Areas of High Seismic Risk: A Methodology for Estimating the Risk of Post-Earthquake Hazardous Materials Release , 1996 .

[32]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  The assessment of risk caused by domino effect in quantitative area risk analysis. , 2005, Journal of hazardous materials.

[33]  E. Marzo,et al.  Definition of a short-cut methodology for assessing the vulnerability of a territory in natural-technological risk estimation , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[34]  Renato Rota,et al.  Definition of a short-cut methodology for assessing earthquake-related Na-Tech risk. , 2011, Journal of hazardous materials.

[35]  Hao Chen,et al.  Risk assessment study of fire following an earthquake: a case study of petrochemical enterprises in China , 2013 .

[36]  Kevin R. Mackie,et al.  Comparison of Incremental Dynamic, Cloud, and Stripe Methods for Computing Probabilistic Seismic Demand Models , 2005 .

[37]  S. Girgin,et al.  The natech events during the 17 August 1999 Kocaeli earthquake: aftermath and lessons learned , 2011 .

[38]  T. Saaty Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2000 .

[39]  Elisabeth Krausmann,et al.  RAPID-N: Rapid natech risk assessment and mapping framework , 2013 .

[40]  Ritsu Dobashi,et al.  Fire and explosion disasters occurred due to the Great East Japan Earthquake (March 11, 2011) , 2014 .

[41]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  The quantitative assessment of domino effects caused by overpressure. Part I. Probit models. , 2004, Journal of hazardous materials.

[42]  Genserik Reniers,et al.  Introduction to the SI of JLPPI on 'process safety and globalization' , 2013 .

[43]  Bulent Akbas,et al.  Seismic vulnerability mitigation of liquefied gas tanks using concave sliding bearings , 2016, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[44]  M. De Angelis,et al.  Seismic response mitigation of chemical plant components by passive control techniques , 2013 .

[45]  S Contini,et al.  Through ARIPAR-GIS the quantified area risk analysis supports land-use planning activities. , 2000, Journal of hazardous materials.

[46]  J. Bommer,et al.  PREDICTION OF HORIZONTAL RESPONSE SPECTRA IN EUROPE , 1996 .

[47]  Spyros A. Karamanos,et al.  A simple and efficient model for seismic response and low-cycle fatigue assessment of uplifting liquid storage tanks , 2017 .

[48]  M. Sam Mannan,et al.  Case study: Assessment on large scale LPG BLEVEs in the 2011 Tohoku earthquakes , 2015 .

[49]  Farid Kadri,et al.  Domino Effect Analysis and Assessment of Industrial Sites: A Review of Methodologies and Software Tools , 2013 .

[50]  Choon-Foo Shih,et al.  Failure of liquid storage tanks due to earthquake excitation , 1981 .

[51]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Quantitative assessment of domino and NaTech scenarios in complex industrial areas , 2014 .

[52]  Fabrizio Paolacci,et al.  Fragility analysis methods for steel storage tanks in seismic prone areas , 2016 .

[53]  C. Cornell Engineering seismic risk analysis , 1968 .

[54]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Efficient Analytical Fragility Function Fitting Using Dynamic Structural Analysis , 2015 .

[55]  Antonio Casimiro Caputo A Model for Probabilistic Seismic Risk Assessment of Process Plants , 2016 .

[56]  Renato Giannini,et al.  QUANTITATIVE SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT OF PROCESS PLANTS. STATE OF THE ART REVIEW AND DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH , 2015 .

[57]  Kasım Armağan Korkmaz,et al.  Seismic risk assessment of storage tanks in Turkish industrial facilities , 2011 .

[58]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Extending the quantitative assessment of industrial risks to earthquake effects. , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[59]  Antonio Casimiro Caputo,et al.  Numerical simulation of seismic risk and loss propagation effects in process plants. An oil refinery case study. , 2017 .

[60]  J. Baker,et al.  An Introduction to Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA) , 2008 .

[61]  Fabrizio Paolacci,et al.  Efficient Intensity Measures for Probabilistic Seismic Response Analysis of Anchored Above-Ground Liquid Steel Storage Tanks , 2016 .

[62]  Pitilakis Kyriazis,et al.  Harmonized approach to stress tests for critical infrastructures against natural hazards: STREST Reference Report 6 , 2016 .

[63]  Lina Balluz,et al.  Natural and technologic hazardous material releases during and after natural disasters: a review. , 2004, The Science of the total environment.