FDG PET during radiochemotherapy is predictive of outcome at 1 year in non-small-cell lung cancer patients: a prospective multicentre study (RTEP2)

PurposeTo assess prospectively the prognostic value of FDG PET/CT during curative-intent radiotherapy (RT) with or without concomitant chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsPatients with histological proof of invasive localized NSCLC and evaluable tumour, and who were candidates for curative-intent radiochemotherapy (RCT) or RT were preincluded after providing written informed consent. Definitive inclusion was conditional upon significant FDG uptake before RT (PET1). All included patients had a FDG PET/CT scan during RT (PET2, mean dose 43 Gy) and were evaluated by FDG PET/CT at 3 months and 1 year after RT. The main endpoint was death (from whatever cause) or tumour progression at 1 year.ResultsOf 77 patients preincluded, 52 were evaluable. Among the evaluable patients, 77 % received RT with induction chemotherapy and 73 % RT with concomitant chemotherapy. At 1 year, 40 patients (77 %) had died or had tumour progression. No statistically significant association was found between stage (IIIB vs. other), histology (squamous cell carcinoma vs. other), induction or concomitant chemotherapy, and death/tumour progression at 1 year. The SUVmax in the PET2 scan was the single variable predictive of death or tumour progression at 1 year (odds ratio 1.97, 95 % CI 1.25 – 3.09, p = 0.003) in multivariate analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.85 (95 % CI 0.73 – 0.94, p < 10−4). A SUVmax value of 5.3 in the PET2 scan yielded a sensitivity of 70 % and a specificity of 92 % for predicting tumour progression or death at 1 year.ConclusionThis prospective multicentre study demonstrated the prognostic value in terms of disease-free survival of SUVmax assessed during the 5th week of curative-intent RT or RCT in NSCLC patients (NCT01261598; RTEP2 study).

[1]  J. Crowley,et al.  The Impact of Additional Prognostic Factors on Survival and their Relationship with the Anatomical Extent of Disease Expressed by the 6th Edition of the TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors and the Proposals for the 7th Edition , 2008, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[2]  S M Larson,et al.  Segmentation of lung lesion volume by adaptive positron emission tomography image thresholding , 1997, Cancer.

[3]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  The PET-boost randomised phase II dose-escalation trial in non-small cell lung cancer. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  M. Brundage,et al.  Prognostic factors in non-small cell lung cancer: a decade of progress. , 2002, Chest.

[5]  Jeffrey D Bradley,et al.  Prediction of survival by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer undergoing definitive chemoradiation therapy: results of the ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 trial. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  Philippe Lambin,et al.  Response Assessment Using 18F-FDG PET Early in the Course of Radiotherapy Correlates with Survival in Advanced-Stage Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  Can modest escalations of dose be detected as increased tumor control? , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Robert Jeraj,et al.  Impact of the Definition of Peak Standardized Uptake Value on Quantification of Treatment Response , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  Baosheng Li,et al.  Standard uptake value and metabolic tumor volume of 18F-FDG PET/CT predict short-term outcome early in the course of chemoradiotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[10]  Pierre Vera,et al.  Serial assessment of FDG-PET FDG uptake and functional volume during radiotherapy (RT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  W. Oyen,et al.  The Netherlands protocol for standardisation and quantification of FDG whole body PET studies in multi-centre trials , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[12]  R. Boellaard Need for Standardization of 18F-FDG PET/CT for Treatment Response Assessments , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  S. Faria,et al.  FDG PET in the evaluation of treatment for lymphoma: clinical usefulness and pitfalls. , 2005, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[14]  M Vermandel,et al.  An easy-to-use phantom and protocol for weekly PET quality assessment: a multicenter study. , 2008, Medical physics.

[15]  P. Lambin,et al.  Early CT and FDG-metabolic tumour volume changes show a significant correlation with survival in stage I-III small cell lung cancer: a hypothesis generating study. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  C. Copie-Bergman,et al.  Interim [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy plus rituximab. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  P. Lambin,et al.  Time trends in the maximal uptake of FDG on PET scan during thoracic radiotherapy. A prospective study in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients , 2007 .

[18]  Indrin J Chetty,et al.  A pilot study of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scans during and after radiation-based therapy in patients with non small-cell lung cancer. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  Dirk De Ruysscher,et al.  PET scans in radiotherapy planning of lung cancer. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  L. Leslie,et al.  A decade of progress. , 1969, Minnesota medicine.

[21]  J. Yue,et al.  Prognostic value of serial [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT uptake in stage III patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[22]  Philippe Lambin,et al.  PET-CT-based auto-contouring in non-small-cell lung cancer correlates with pathology and reduces interobserver variability in the delineation of the primary tumor and involved nodal volumes. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  R. Wahl,et al.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[24]  Philippe Lambin,et al.  Mature results of an individualized radiation dose prescription study based on normal tissue constraints in stages I to III non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.