OBJECTIVE
Our previous study has developed the non-invasive models to predict the vertebral inclination angles by relating the external stick marker angles and radiographic measurements during trunk flexion. Based on these models, the present study attempted to further predict the inclination angles using externally measured body posture (i.e., lumbar posture, trunk flexion angle, knee angle) as well as load handling.
DESIGN
Prediction models of the vertebral inclination angles were developed with a stepwise regression technique. This was done by selecting related postural variables as well as load handling as predictors.
BACKGROUND
The technique of skin-surface stick marker has been investigated for measuring vertebral inclination angles. This technique, however, is rarely systematically validated by radiographic measurement because of concerns over radiation exposure, especially for ergonomical purposes.
METHODS
Twelve healthy men aged 22-31 years were recruited in the experiment. The angles of the vertebral markers and subject's posture were recorded videographically as the subject performed a given task. Prediction models were then developed to express the relationships between the vertebral inclinations and the lifting postures.
RESULTS
The prediction models revealed that the lumbar posture (lordosis or kyphosis) had a statistically significant effect on these inclination angles. Non-linear first-order regression models of the torso angle and the pelvic angle were fit to the transformed vertebral inclination angles (transformed from external stick marker angle), with resulting R(2) values between 0. 86 and 0.92.
CONCLUSIONS
These findings indicate that the vertebral inclination angles can be calculated easily and with relative accuracy on the basis of the externally measured torso and pelvis angles.
RELEVANCE
Measurements of lumbosacral vertebral inclination angles are important in assessing low back stress during lifting. In this study, we used a regression approach to model these angles of the lumbar/sacrum spine in different lumbar postures in the sagittal plane. Our data suggest that the vertebral inclination angles can be calculated easily. These models may be useful to the low back stress evaluation and job design through a biomechanical analysis.
[1]
R. Burdett,et al.
Reliability and validity of four instruments for measuring lumbar spine and pelvic positions.
,
1986,
Physical therapy.
[2]
D B Chaffin,et al.
A Study of Lumbosacral Orientation under Varied Static Loads
,
1986,
Spine.
[3]
M. Flint,et al.
Lumbar Posture: A Study of Roentgenographic Measurement and the Influence of Flexibility and Strength
,
1963
.
[4]
J. M. Rothstein,et al.
Relationships between lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, and abdominal muscle performance.
,
1987,
Physical therapy.
[5]
D B Chaffin,et al.
A dynamic biomechanical evaluation of lifting maximum acceptable loads.
,
1984,
Journal of biomechanics.
[6]
D. Hart,et al.
Effect of Lumbar Posture on Lifting
,
1987,
Spine.
[7]
S. Kumar,et al.
A study of spinal motion during lifting
,
1974,
Irish journal of medical science.
[8]
J A Holmes,et al.
Erector Spinae Activation and Movement Dynamics About the Lumbar Spine in Lordotic and Kyphotic Squat-Lifting
,
1992,
Spine.
[9]
Richard G. Snyder,et al.
A prediction model of human torso volitional mobility
,
1972
.
[10]
T. Beeker,et al.
Toward Standards for Posture: Postural Characteristics of the Lower Back System in Normal and Pathologic Conditions
,
1985,
Spine.
[11]
Y-H Lee,et al.
A non-invasive protocol for the determination of lumbosacral vertebral angle.
,
1997,
Clinical Biomechanics.
[12]
Royal,et al.
MOVEMENTS OF THE THORACIC AND LUMBAR SPINE WHEN LIFTING: A CHRONO-CYCLOPHOTOGRAPHIC STUDY.
,
1965,
Journal of anatomy.
[13]
S. Rose,et al.
An electromyographic analysis of two techniques for squat lifting and lowering.
,
1992,
Physical therapy.
[14]
R. Norman,et al.
1986 Volvo Award in Biomechanics: Partitioning of the L4 - L5 Dynamic Moment into Disc, Ligamentous, and Muscular Components During Lifting
,
1986,
Spine.
[15]
D B Chaffin,et al.
A biomechanical evaluation of five lifting techniques.
,
1986,
Applied ergonomics.