A Predictive Model for Notional Anaphora in English

Notional anaphors are pronouns which disagree with their antecedents' grammatical categories for notional reasons, such as plural to singular agreement in: 'the government ... they'. Since such cases are rare and conflict with evidence from strictly agreeing cases ('the government ... it'), they present a substantial challenge to both coreference resolution and referring expression generation. Using the OntoNotes corpus, this paper takes an ensemble approach to predicting English notional anaphora in context on the basis of the largest empirical data to date. In addition to state of the art prediction accuracy, the results suggest that theoretical approaches positing a plural construal at the antecedent's utterance are insufficient, and that circumstances at the anaphor's utterance location, as well as global factors such as genre, have a strong effect on the choice of referring expression.

[1]  Anne Curzan,et al.  Gender shifts in the history of English , 2003 .

[2]  Pierre Geurts,et al.  Extremely randomized trees , 2006, Machine Learning.

[3]  Amir Zeldes,et al.  When Annotation Schemes Change Rules Help: A Configurable Approach to Coreference Resolution beyond OntoNotes , 2016, CORBON@HLT-NAACL.

[4]  Mihai Surdeanu,et al.  The Stanford CoreNLP Natural Language Processing Toolkit , 2014, ACL.

[5]  A. Staub On the interpretation of the number attraction effect: Response time evidence. , 2009, Journal of memory and language.

[6]  Anthony McEnery,et al.  The UCREL Semantic Analysis System , 2004 .

[7]  Henri Annala Changes in Subject-Verb Agreement with Collective Nouns in British English from the 18th Century to the Present Day , 2008 .

[8]  Mitchell P. Marcus,et al.  OntoNotes: The 90% Solution , 2006, NAACL.

[9]  Marta Recasens,et al.  Sense Anaphoric Pronouns: Am I One? , 2016, CORBON@HLT-NAACL.

[10]  Christopher Potts,et al.  The Life and Death of Discourse Entities: Identifying Singleton Mentions , 2013, NAACL.

[11]  Laura L. Paterson,et al.  The use and prescription of epicene pronouns: a corpus-based approach to generic he and singular they in British English , 2011 .

[12]  H. Hughes The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language , 2003 .

[13]  Jan Svartvik,et al.  A __ comprehensive grammar of the English language , 1988 .

[14]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  Agreement Attraction in Comprehension: Representations and Processes. , 2009 .

[15]  N. Sobin Agreement, default rules, and grammatical viruses , 1997 .

[16]  友繁 義典,et al.  A communicative grammar of English , 2010 .

[17]  Magnus Levin Agreement With Collective Nouns in English , 2001 .

[18]  M. D. Dikken,et al.  “Pluringulars”, pronouns and quirky agreement , 2001 .

[19]  Emiel Krahmer,et al.  Computational Generation of Referring Expressions: A Survey , 2012, CL.

[20]  U. Sauerland A New Semantics for Number , 2003 .

[21]  Wallis Hoch Reid,et al.  Verb and Noun Number in English: A Functional Explanation , 1991 .

[22]  Ilse Depraetere,et al.  On verbal concord with collective nouns in British English , 2003, English Language and Linguistics.