Evaluation of whole-genome DNA methylation sequencing library preparation protocols

Background With rapidly dropping sequencing cost, the popularity of whole-genome DNA methylation sequencing has been on the rise. Multiple library preparation protocols currently exist. We have performed 22 whole-genome DNA methylation sequencing experiments on snap frozen human samples, and extensively benchmarked common library preparation protocols for whole-genome DNA methylation sequencing, including three traditional bisulfite-based protocols and a new enzyme-based protocol. In addition, different input DNA quantities were compared for two kits compatible with a reduced starting quantity. In addition, we also present bioinformatic analysis pipelines for sequencing data from each of these library types. Results An assortment of metrics were collected for each kit, including raw read statistics, library quality and uniformity metrics, cytosine retention, and CpG beta value consistency between technical replicates. Overall, the NEBNext Enzymatic Methyl-seq and Swift Accel-NGS Methyl-Seq kits performed quantitatively better than the other two protocols. In addition, the NEB and Swift kits performed well at low-input amounts, validating their utility in applications where DNA is the limiting factor. Results The NEBNext Enzymatic Methyl-seq kit appeared to be the best option for whole-genome DNA methylation sequencing of high-quality DNA, closely followed by the Swift kit, which potentially works better for degraded samples. Further, a general bioinformatic pipeline is applicable across the four protocols, with the exception of extra trimming needed for the Swift Biosciences’s Accel-NGS Methyl-Seq protocol to remove the Adaptase sequence.

[1]  T. C. Evans,et al.  EM-seq: Detection of DNA Methylation at Single Base Resolution from Picograms of DNA , 2019, bioRxiv.

[2]  S. Beck,et al.  Systematic evaluation of library preparation methods and sequencing platforms for high-throughput whole genome bisulfite sequencing , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[3]  N. Benvenisty,et al.  Genomic Imprinting and Physiological Processes in Mammals , 2019, Cell.

[4]  Rajat Singhania,et al.  Sensitive tumour detection and classification using plasma cell-free DNA methylomes , 2018, Nature.

[5]  J. Kench,et al.  Guidelines for whole genome bisulphite sequencing of intact and FFPET DNA on the Illumina HiSeq X Ten , 2018, Epigenetics & Chromatin.

[6]  Hui Shen,et al.  DNA methylation loss in late-replicating domains is linked to mitotic cell division , 2018, Nature Genetics.

[7]  F. Miura,et al.  Post-Bisulfite Adaptor Tagging for PCR-Free Whole-Genome Bisulfite Sequencing. , 2018, Methods in molecular biology.

[8]  R. Scharpf,et al.  High grade serous ovarian carcinomas originate in the fallopian tube , 2017, Nature Communications.

[9]  W. Wasserman,et al.  The SIN3A histone deacetylase complex is required for a complete transcriptional response to hypoxia , 2017, bioRxiv.

[10]  Anshul Kundaje,et al.  Umap and Bismap: quantifying genome and methylome mappability , 2016, bioRxiv.

[11]  Kimberly Walter,et al.  Quantitative comparison of DNA methylation assays for biomarker development and clinical applications , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[12]  Måns Magnusson,et al.  MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report , 2016, Bioinform..

[13]  J. Ecker,et al.  Non-CG Methylation in the Human Genome. , 2015, Annual review of genomics and human genetics.

[14]  Matthew D. Schultz,et al.  Human Body Epigenome Maps Reveal Noncanonical DNA Methylation Variation , 2015, Nature.

[15]  O. Stegle,et al.  Single-Cell Genome-Wide Bisulfite Sequencing for Assessing Epigenetic Heterogeneity , 2014, Nature Methods.

[16]  Ira M. Hall,et al.  SAMBLASTER: fast duplicate marking and structural variant read extraction , 2014, Bioinform..

[17]  Timothy Daley,et al.  Predicting the molecular complexity of sequencing libraries , 2013, Nature Methods.

[18]  Zohar Mukamel,et al.  Epigenetic polymorphism and the stochastic formation of differentially methylated regions in normal and cancerous tissues , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[19]  B. Langmead,et al.  BSmooth: from whole genome bisulfite sequencing reads to differentially methylated regions , 2012, Genome Biology.

[20]  F. Miura,et al.  Amplification-free whole-genome bisulfite sequencing by post-bisulfite adaptor tagging , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  K. Patterson,et al.  DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis , 2011, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[22]  Helga Thorvaldsdóttir,et al.  Integrative Genomics Viewer , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[23]  Natalie Jäger,et al.  Genome-wide mapping of DNA methylation: a quantitative technology comparison , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[24]  Natalie Jäger,et al.  Genome-wide mapping of DNA methylation : a quantitative technology comparison , 2012 .

[25]  Michael Q. Zhang,et al.  Comparison of sequencing-based methods to profile DNA methylation and identification of monoallelic epigenetic modifications , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[26]  P. Laird.  Principles and challenges of genome-wide DNA methylation analysis , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[27]  Aaron R. Quinlan,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Genome Analysis Bedtools: a Flexible Suite of Utilities for Comparing Genomic Features , 2022 .

[28]  Lee E. Edsall,et al.  Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences , 2009, Nature.

[29]  Gonçalo R. Abecasis,et al.  The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools , 2009, Bioinform..

[30]  J. Mill,et al.  Profiling DNA methylation from small amounts of genomic DNA starting material: efficient sodium bisulfite conversion and subsequent whole-genome amplification. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[31]  R. Lister,et al.  Highly Integrated Single-Base Resolution Maps of the Epigenome in Arabidopsis , 2008, Cell.

[32]  S. Nelson,et al.  Shotgun bisulphite sequencing of the Arabidopsis genome reveals DNA methylation patterning , 2008, Nature.

[33]  Steven S. Smith,et al.  Recovery of bisulfite-converted genomic sequences in the methylation-sensitive QPCR , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[34]  Akimitsu Okamoto,et al.  Degradation of DNA by bisulfite treatment. , 2007, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[35]  Peter L Molloy,et al.  DNA methylation: Bisulphite modification and analysis , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[36]  P. Laird.  Early detection: The power and the promise of DNA methylation markers , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[37]  Hilde van der Togt,et al.  Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[38]  Christoph Grunau,et al.  Bisulfite genomic sequencing: systematic investigation of critical experimental parameters , 2001, Nucleic Acids Res..

[39]  S. Clark,et al.  High sensitivity mapping of methylated cytosines. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[40]  T. Lowe,et al.  General concepts for PCR primer design. , 1993, PCR methods and applications.