A Robust and Biologically Plausible Spike Pattern Recognition Network

The neural mechanisms that enable recognition of spiking patterns in the brain are currently unknown. This is especially relevant in sensory systems, in which the brain has to detect such patterns and recognize relevant stimuli by processing peripheral inputs; in particular, it is unclear how sensory systems can recognize time-varying stimuli by processing spiking activity. Because auditory stimuli are represented by time-varying fluctuations in frequency content, it is useful to consider how such stimuli can be recognized by neural processing. Previous models for sound recognition have used preprocessed or low-level auditory signals as input, but complex natural sounds such as speech are thought to be processed in auditory cortex, and brain regions involved in object recognition in general must deal with the natural variability present in spike trains. Thus, we used neural recordings to investigate how a spike pattern recognition system could deal with the intrinsic variability and diverse response properties of cortical spike trains. We propose a biologically plausible computational spike pattern recognition model that uses an excitatory chain of neurons to spatially preserve the temporal representation of the spike pattern. Using a single neural recording as input, the model can be trained using a spike-timing-dependent plasticity-based learning rule to recognize neural responses to 20 different bird songs with >98% accuracy and can be stimulated to evoke reverse spike pattern playback. Although we test spike train recognition performance in an auditory task, this model can be applied to recognize sufficiently reliable spike patterns from any neuronal system.

[1]  W. Penfield,et al.  Speech and Brain‐Mechanisms , 1960 .

[2]  Henry Markram,et al.  Real-Time Computing Without Stable States: A New Framework for Neural Computation Based on Perturbations , 2002, Neural Computation.

[3]  L. Abbott,et al.  Synaptic plasticity: taming the beast , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Coincidence detection and changes of synaptic efficacy in spiny stellate neurons in rat barrel cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  Dean V Buonomano,et al.  Timing of neural responses in cortical organotypic slices , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  P. Tallal,et al.  Neurobiology of speech perception. , 1997, Annual review of neuroscience.

[7]  Mark C. W. van Rossum,et al.  A Novel Spike Distance , 2001, Neural Computation.

[8]  Josef P. Rauschecker,et al.  Auditory cortical plasticity: a comparison with other sensory systems , 1999, Trends in Neurosciences.

[9]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[10]  M. Poo,et al.  Coincident Pre- and Postsynaptic Activity Modifies GABAergic Synapses by Postsynaptic Changes in Cl− Transporter Activity , 2003, Neuron.

[11]  K. D. Punta,et al.  An ultra-sparse code underlies the generation of neural sequences in a songbird , 2002 .

[12]  J L Gallant,et al.  Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision. , 2000, Science.

[13]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Intrinsic bursting enhances the robustness of a neural network model of sequence generation by avian brain area HVC , 2007, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[14]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems , 2001 .

[15]  R K Shepherd,et al.  The central auditory system and auditory deprivation: experience with cochlear implants in the congenitally deaf. , 1997, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[16]  Paul H. E. Tiesinga,et al.  A New Correlation-Based Measure of Spike Timing Reliability , 2002, Neurocomputing.

[17]  David J. Foster,et al.  Reverse replay of behavioural sequences in hippocampal place cells during the awake state , 2006, Nature.

[18]  Frédéric E. Theunissen,et al.  Auditory processing of vocal sounds in birds , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[19]  N. C. Singh,et al.  Selectivity for conspecific song in the zebra finch auditory forebrain. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Maoz Shamir,et al.  Cortical Discrimination of Complex Natural Stimuli: Can Single Neurons Match Behavior? , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Benjamin J. Kraus,et al.  Invariance and Sensitivity to Intensity in Neural Discrimination of Natural Sounds , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  H. Karten,et al.  Laminar and columnar auditory cortex in avian brain , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Romain Brette,et al.  Exact Simulation of Integrate-and-Fire Models with Synaptic Conductances , 2006, Neural Computation.

[24]  Dezhe Z Jin,et al.  Spiking neural network for recognizing spatiotemporal sequences of spikes. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[25]  Sarah M N Woolley,et al.  Response properties of single neurons in the zebra finch auditory midbrain: response patterns, frequency coding, intensity coding, and spike latencies. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  M. Tarr,et al.  Visual Object Recognition , 1996, ISTCS.

[27]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neural computation by concentrating information in time. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Cyrus P. Billimoria,et al.  Analyzing variability in neural responses to complex natural sounds in the awake songbird. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  H. Heffner,et al.  Effect of unilateral and bilateral auditory cortex lesions on the discrimination of vocalizations by Japanese macaques. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  Bernhard Ronacher,et al.  Single auditory neurons rapidly discriminate conspecific communication signals , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  H. Sompolinsky,et al.  Time-Warp–Invariant Neuronal Processing , 2009, PLoS biology.

[32]  W. Maass,et al.  State-dependent computations: spatiotemporal processing in cortical networks , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[33]  F. Theunissen,et al.  Role of the zebra finch auditory thalamus in generating complex representations for natural sounds. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Tim Gollisch,et al.  Time-warp invariant pattern detection with bursting neurons , 2008 .

[35]  Rajiv Narayan,et al.  Distinct time scales in cortical discrimination of natural sounds in songbirds. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  Frédéric E Theunissen,et al.  Functional Groups in the Avian Auditory System , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Models of object recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  Christopher M. Glaze,et al.  Temporal Structure in Zebra Finch Song: Implications for Motor Coding , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.