Effects of Monitor Refresh Rates on c-VEP BCIs

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) allow humans to form a physical symbiosis with computer systems. One use case scenario of BCIs is communication by brain activity. High spelling speeds have been achieved with BCIs based on code-modulated visual evoked potentials (c-VEPs). Typically, the flickering stimuli are presented on a standard 60 Hz monitor. Users can find VEP-based BCIs annoying and tiring due to the perceptible flickering. This is especially the case for multi-target systems designed for maximal communication speed. Higher monitor refresh rates allow a faster flickering rate for BCI targets, and thus a more subtle visual stimulation. In this paper, user friendliness and speed of c-VEP BCIs with different monitor refresh rates (60, 120 and 200 Hz) are compared. The experiment was comprised of three sessions (each consisting of training and spelling stages), one for each tested monitor refresh rate. Performance was assessed with ITR and accuracy and user friendliness was evaluated using a questionnaire. High flickering speed is usually accompanied by poorer BCI performance. In this study, the system utilizing the 200 Hz refresh rate surprisingly competed well in terms of ITR and accuracy. Regarding user friendliness it was preferred by most users, as expected.

[1]  Tomasz M. Rutkowski,et al.  A Sixteen-Command and 40 Hz Carrier Frequency Code-Modulated Visual Evoked Potential BCI , 2017, Brain-Computer Interface Research.

[2]  Benjamin Blankertz,et al.  A Note on Brain Actuated Spelling with the Berlin Brain-Computer Interface , 2007, HCI.

[3]  H. Lasota,et al.  Application of maximum-length sequences to impulse response measurement of hydroacoustic communications systems , 2007 .

[4]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[5]  Ivan Volosyak,et al.  Impact of Frequency Selection on LCD Screens for SSVEP Based Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2009, IWANN.

[6]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  Online Adaptation of a c-VEP Brain-Computer Interface(BCI) Based on Error-Related Potentials and Unsupervised Learning , 2012, PloS one.

[7]  Abdullah Akce,et al.  An SSVEP-Based Brain–Computer Interface for Text Spelling With Adaptive Queries That Maximize Information Gain Rates , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  Siwei Feng,et al.  Stimulus Specificity of Brain-Computer Interfaces Based on Code Modulation Visual Evoked Potentials , 2016, PloS one.

[9]  Piotr Stawicki,et al.  Autonomous Parameter Adjustment for SSVEP-Based BCIs with a Novel BCI Wizard , 2015, Front. Neurosci..

[10]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  One Class SVM and Canonical Correlation Analysis increase performance in a c-VEP based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) , 2012, ESANN.

[11]  Piotr Stawicki,et al.  A Novel Hybrid Mental Spelling Application Based on Eye Tracking and SSVEP-Based BCI , 2017, Brain sciences.

[12]  Piotr Stawicki,et al.  Age-related differences in SSVEP-based BCI performance , 2017, Neurocomputing.

[13]  Yijun Wang,et al.  A high-speed BCI based on code modulation VEP , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[14]  Yijun Wang,et al.  VEP-based brain-computer interfaces: time, frequency, and code modulations [Research Frontier] , 2009, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[15]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  Spatial Filtering Based on Canonical Correlation Analysis for Classification of Evoked or Event-Related Potentials in EEG Data , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[16]  Wei Wu,et al.  Frequency Recognition Based on Canonical Correlation Analysis for SSVEP-Based BCIs , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.