Asymmetrical Neural Substrates of Tactile Discrimination in Humans: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

The left-hand advantage seen during tactile discrimination tasks suggests hemispheric-processing asymmetry, although its neural substrates are not well known. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate the laterality of the neural substrates involved in tactile discrimination in 19 normal volunteers. Passive tactile discrimination tasks, along with appropriate control tasks, were performed with both the right and left hands to evaluate the effects of the hand used and hemispheric effects (i.e., laterality of the activation pattern). Regardless of the hand used, the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, posterior parietal cortex, pre-supplementary motor area, and rostral portion of the dorsal premotor cortex (PMdr) were activated asymmetrically during tactile discrimination. This confirms the previous finding of a right-sided asymmetry for tactile shape discrimination. Hand effects were found in the left caudal portion of PMd (PMdc) adjacent to the central sulcus, which showed prominent activation during right-handed but not left-handed discrimination tasks. This asymmetric activation in the left PMdc might be related to the asymmetric interhemispheric interaction during right-handed tactile discrimination.

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Cortical areas and the selection of movement: a study with positron emission tomography , 1991, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  M. Wiesendanger,et al.  Transcallosal connections of the distal forelimb representations of the primary and supplementary motor cortical areas in macaque monkeys , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  R. E. Passingham,et al.  Premotor cortex and preparation for movement , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  Takashi Hanakawa,et al.  Differential activity in the premotor cortex subdivisions in humans during mental calculation and verbal rehearsal tasks: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[5]  M. Honda,et al.  The role of rostral Brodmann area 6 in mental-operation tasks: an integrative neuroimaging approach. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  Manabu Honda,et al.  Critical Period for Cross-Modal Plasticity in Blind Humans: A Functional MRI Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[7]  C. Gerloff,et al.  Bimanual coordination and interhemispheric interaction. , 2002, Acta psychologica.

[8]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[9]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Motor and cognitive functions of the ventral premotor cortex , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[10]  M. Hallett,et al.  The Role of the Medial Wall and Its Anatomical Variations for Bimanual Antiphase and In-Phase Movements , 2001, NeuroImage.

[11]  K. Zilles,et al.  Hierarchical Processing of Tactile Shape in the Human Brain , 2001, Neuron.

[12]  R. Romo,et al.  Touch and go: decision-making mechanisms in somatosensation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[13]  K. Zilles,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of the primate isocortical motor system , 2000, Anatomy and Embryology.

[14]  Jinhu Xiong,et al.  The human red nucleus and lateral cerebellum in supporting roles for sensory information processing , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[15]  S. Wise,et al.  Arbitrary associations between antecedents and actions , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[16]  G. Mangun,et al.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  I. Kermadi,et al.  Do bimanual motor actions involve the dorsal premotor (PMd), cingulate (CMA) and posterior parietal (PPC) cortices? Comparison with primary and supplementary motor cortical areas. , 2000, Somatosensory & motor research.

[18]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  How Many Subjects Constitute a Study? , 1999, NeuroImage.

[20]  Joel R. Meyer,et al.  A large-scale distributed network for covert spatial attention: further anatomical delineation based on stringent behavioural and cognitive controls. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  Y. Iwamura.  Hierarchical somatosensory processing , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[22]  M. Hallett,et al.  Neural networks for Braille reading by the blind. , 1998 .

[23]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The organization of the cortical motor system: new concepts. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  P. Roland,et al.  Shape and roughness activate different somatosensory areas in the human brain. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  M. Hallett,et al.  Cerebral Processes Related to Visuomotor Imagery and Generation of Simple Finger Movements Studied with Positron Emission Tomography , 1998, NeuroImage.

[26]  N. Sadato,et al.  Role of the Supplementary Motor Area and the Right Premotor Cortex in the Coordination of Bimanual Finger Movements , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  M. Hallett,et al.  Frontal and parietal networks for conditional motor learning: a positron emission tomography study. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  G E Alexander,et al.  Preferential representation of instructed target location versus limb trajectory in dorsal premotor area. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Localization of the motor hand area to a knob on the precentral gyrus. A new landmark. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[30]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Detecting Activations in PET and fMRI: Levels of Inference and Power , 1996, NeuroImage.

[31]  J. Bower,et al.  Cerebellum Implicated in Sensory Acquisition and Discrimination Rather Than Motor Control , 1996, Science.

[32]  Paul B. Johnson,et al.  Cortical networks for visual reaching: physiological and anatomical organization of frontal and parietal lobe arm regions. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Functional imaging of human right hemispheric activation for exploratory movements , 1996, Annals of neurology.

[34]  S E Petersen,et al.  A positron emission tomography study of the short-term maintenance of verbal information , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[35]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[36]  D. Boussaoud,et al.  Direct visual pathways for reaching movements in the macaque monkey , 1995, Neuroreport.

[37]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[38]  P. Strick,et al.  Activation of a cerebellar output nucleus during cognitive processing. , 1994, Science.

[39]  Ryuta Kawashima,et al.  A PET Study of Somatosensory Discrimination in Man. Microgeometry Versus Macrogeometry , 1994, The European journal of neuroscience.

[40]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  An MRI-Based Probabilistic Atlas of Neuroanatomy , 1994 .

[41]  S. Petersen,et al.  Practice-related changes in human brain functional anatomy during nonmotor learning. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Synaptic development of the cerebral cortex: implications for learning, memory, and mental illness. , 1994, Progress in brain research.

[43]  G. Bydder,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Scanning and Epilepsy , 1994, NATO ASI Series.

[44]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[45]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of functional MRI time‐series , 1994, Human Brain Mapping.

[46]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Spatial working memory in humans as revealed by PET , 1993, Nature.

[47]  Kiyoshi Kurata,et al.  Corticocortical inputs to the dorsal and ventral aspects of the premotor cortex of macaque monkeys , 1991, Neuroscience Research.

[48]  P. T. Fox,et al.  Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing , 1988, Nature.

[49]  D. Pandya,et al.  Architecture and frontal cortical connections of the premotor cortex (area 6) in the rhesus monkey , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[50]  M. Petrides.  The effect of periarcuate lesions in the monkey on the performance of symmetrically and asymmetrically reinforced visual and auditory go, no- go tasks , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[51]  S. Wise,et al.  The premotor cortex of the monkey , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[52]  A. Dodds.  Hemispheric differences in tactuo-spatial processing , 1978, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  Santosh Kumar.  Short Term Memory for a Nonverbal Tactual Task After Cerebral Commissurotomy , 1977, Cortex.

[54]  Deepak N. Pandya,et al.  Further observations on corticofrontal connections in the rhesus monkey , 1976, Brain Research.

[55]  R. Sperry,et al.  Performance on the Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices Test by Subjects with Cerebral Commissurotomy , 1973 .

[56]  B Milner,et al.  Right-hemisphere superiority in tactile pattern-recognition after cerebral commissurotomy: evidence for nonverbal memory. , 1972, Neuropsychologia.

[57]  A. Benton,et al.  Tactile perception of direction in relation to hemispheric locus of lesion. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[58]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[59]  A. Benton,et al.  Tactile perception of direction and number in patients with unilateral cerebral disease , 1969, Neurology.