An analysis of DYMO, FSR, ZRP and RIP routing protocols using QUALNET

The design considerations of a wireless networks include Path routing and protocol selection. The protocol selection in Mobile Ad hoc NETwork (MANET) is important to ensure optimum data delivery and rigid data integrity. Hence the performance analysis of the protocols becomes a major step in designing a MANET. In this paper, we have carried performance analysis on DYnamic Manet On demand routing protocol (DYMO), Fisheye State Routing (FSR), Routing Information Protocol (RIP) and Zone Routing protocol (ZRP) using QualNet simulator. To judge the suitability of these protocols metrics like delay, throughput and jitter are measured. The variation is done in network size and area. We observed that DYMO gives best result in terms of average end to end delay and jitter. FSR performed better than others for throughput.

[1]  P. Kanungo,et al.  Performance analysis of AODV, DSR, OLSR and DSDV routing protocols using NS2 simulator , 2012 .

[2]  Subir Kumar Sarkar,et al.  Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks: Principles, Protocols and Applications , 2007 .

[3]  Wu Yue,et al.  Distributed intrusion detection for mobile ad hoc networks , 2008 .

[4]  Anil K. Sarje,et al.  Comparative performance analysis of LANMAR, LAR1, DYMO and ZRP routing protocols in MANET using Random Waypoint Mobility Model , 2011, 2011 3rd International Conference on Electronics Computer Technology.

[5]  Ashish Shrestha,et al.  On MANET Routing Protocols for Mobility and Scalability , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing, Applications and Technologies.

[6]  V. R. Sarma Dhulipala,et al.  Throughput and Delay Comparison of MANET Routing Protocols , 2009 .

[7]  Shiyong Zhang,et al.  Distributed Intrusion Detection for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2005, 2005 Symposium on Applications and the Internet Workshops (SAINT 2005 Workshops).

[8]  Farhat Anwar,et al.  A simulation based performance comparison of routing protocol on Mobile Ad-hoc Network (proactive, reactive and hybrid) , 2010, International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering (ICCCE'10).