Risk Stratification of Endometrial Cancer Patients: FIGO Stage, Biomarkers and Molecular Classification

Simple Summary Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynaecologic malignancy in developed countries. Most patients are sufficiently treated with removal of uterus, tubes and ovaries. It depends on the estimated risk of metastases at diagnosis if more extensive surgery (removal of lymph nodes, peritoneum and/or omentum), to detect small metastases, is indicated. Metastases are associated with a higher risk of recurrence and justify adjuvant treatment (i.e., radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy). Recently it is advised to also subdivide EC into four molecular subgroups. Each subgroup is highly associated to a certain risk of recurrence and helps to decide for adjuvant treatment. What surgery should be performed in each of the subgroups is currently unknown. Moreover, it is uncertain if integration of other factors into the molecular classification could help to improve the risk classification. This review summarizes different aspects of surgery. Moreover, the relation between metastases and other factors including molecular classification are evaluated. Abstract Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynaecologic malignancy in developed countries. The main challenge in EC management is to correctly estimate the risk of metastases at diagnosis and the risk to develop recurrences in the future. Risk stratification determines the need for surgical staging and adjuvant treatment. Detection of occult, microscopic metastases upstages patients, provides important prognostic information and guides adjuvant treatment. The molecular classification subdivides EC into four prognostic subgroups: POLE ultramutated; mismatch repair deficient (MMRd); nonspecific molecular profile (NSMP); and TP53 mutated (p53abn). How surgical staging should be adjusted based on preoperative molecular profiling is currently unknown. Moreover, little is known whether and how other known prognostic biomarkers affect prognosis prediction independent of or in addition to these molecular subgroups. This review summarizes the factors incorporated in surgical staging (i.e., peritoneal washing, lymph node dissection, omentectomy and peritoneal biopsies), and its impact on prognosis and adjuvant treatment decisions in an era of molecular classification of EC. Moreover, the relation between FIGO stage and molecular classification is evaluated including the current gaps in knowledge and future perspectives.

[1]  G. Ortoft,et al.  Predictive value of the new ESGO-ESTRO-ESP endometrial cancer risk classification on survival and recurrence in the Danish population , 2021, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[2]  J. How,et al.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in high-grade endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of performance characteristics. , 2021, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  G. Zannoni,et al.  New Pathological and Clinical Insights in Endometrial Cancer in View of the Updated ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines , 2021, Cancers.

[4]  F. Amant,et al.  Incorporating molecular profiling into endometrial cancer management requires prospective studies , 2021, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[5]  L. Havrilesky,et al.  Primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced stage endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2021, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  L. Alexandrov,et al.  A phase II evaluation of pembrolizumab in recurrent microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) endometrial cancer patients with Lynch-like versus MLH-1 methylated characteristics (NCT02899793). , 2021, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[7]  M. Mueller,et al.  Implementation of the 2021 molecular ESGO/ESTRO/ESP risk groups in endometrial cancer , 2021, medRxiv.

[8]  L. Insabato,et al.  Clinical features of ProMisE groups identify different phenotypes of patients with endometrial cancer , 2021, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[9]  M. Morgan,et al.  Is there a benefit of performing an omentectomy for clinical stage I high-grade endometrial carcinoma? , 2021, Surgical oncology.

[10]  D. Levine,et al.  Mutated p53 portends improvement in outcomes when bevacizumab is combined with chemotherapy in advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer: An NRG Oncology study. , 2021, Gynecologic oncology.

[11]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2021 , 2021, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[12]  B. Winkens,et al.  Lymphedema and Post-Operative Complications after Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy versus Lymphadenectomy in Endometrial Carcinomas—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2020, Journal of clinical medicine.

[13]  H. Mackay,et al.  HER2 Status in High-Risk Endometrial Cancers (PORTEC-3): Relationship with Histotype, Molecular Classification, and Clinical Outcomes , 2020, Cancers.

[14]  Cyrus Chargari,et al.  ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma , 2020, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[15]  S. Leung,et al.  The cut-off for estrogen and progesterone receptor in endometrial cancer revisited: an ENITEC collaboration study. , 2020, Human pathology.

[16]  Ho Jin Jung,et al.  Interobserver diagnostic reproducibility in advanced-stage endometrial carcinoma , 2020, Journal of pathology and translational medicine.

[17]  L. Chambers,et al.  Impact of treatment modality on overall survival in women with advanced endometrial cancer: A National Cancer Database analysis. , 2020, Gynecologic oncology.

[18]  H. Putter,et al.  PORTEC-4a: international randomized trial of molecular profile-based adjuvant treatment for women with high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer , 2020, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[19]  P. Lin,et al.  MET Mutation Is a Potential Therapeutic Target for Advanced Endometrial Cancer , 2020, Cancers.

[20]  K. Pantel,et al.  Clinical relevance of blood-based ctDNA analysis: mutation detection and beyond , 2020, British Journal of Cancer.

[21]  A. Tinker,et al.  LBA36 Safety and antitumor activity of dostarlimab in patients (pts) with advanced or recurrent DNA mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) or proficient (MMRp) endometrial cancer (EC): Results from GARNET , 2020 .

[22]  M. Schlumbrecht,et al.  Thrombocytosis as a Biomarker in Type II, Non-Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer , 2020, Cancers.

[23]  H. Putter,et al.  Molecular Classification of the PORTEC-3 Trial for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Impact on Prognosis and Benefit From Adjuvant Therapy , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  P. Harter,et al.  Malignant peritoneal cytology and increased mortality risk in stage I non-endometrioid endometrial cancer. , 2020, Gynecologic oncology.

[25]  G. Dittmar,et al.  Prognostic Biomarkers in Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2020, Journal of clinical medicine.

[26]  F. Guyon,et al.  Combined pelvic and para-aortic is superior to only pelvic lymphadenectomy in intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2020, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[27]  D. Boll,et al.  Impact of different adjuvant treatment approaches on survival in stage III endometrial cancer: A population-based study. , 2020, European journal of cancer.

[28]  Peter J.F. Lucas,et al.  Preoperative risk stratification in endometrial cancer (ENDORISK) by a Bayesian network model: A development and validation study , 2020, PLoS medicine.

[29]  D. Boll,et al.  Incidence and predictors of peritoneal metastases of gynecological origin: a population-based study in the Netherlands , 2020, Journal of gynecologic oncology.

[30]  E. Moss,et al.  Utility of Circulating Tumor DNA for Detection and Monitoring of Endometrial Cancer Recurrence and Progression , 2020, Cancers.

[31]  Julie A. Dybvik,et al.  Preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT tumor markers outperform MRI-based markers for the prediction of lymph node metastases in primary endometrial cancer , 2020, European Radiology.

[32]  M. C. Vos,et al.  Molecular profiling identifies synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancers as metastatic endometrial cancer with favorable clinical outcome , 2020, International journal of cancer.

[33]  C. Moiola,et al.  Genomic Profiling of Uterine Aspirates and cfDNA as an Integrative Liquid Biopsy Strategy in Endometrial Cancer , 2020, Journal of clinical medicine.

[34]  T. Bosse,et al.  Incorporation of molecular characteristics into endometrial cancer management , 2019, Histopathology.

[35]  C. Gilks,et al.  Clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of ‘multiple‐classifier’ endometrial carcinomas , 2019, The Journal of pathology.

[36]  J. Lang,et al.  The prognostic role of peritoneal cytology in stage IA endometrial endometrioid carcinomas. , 2019, Current problems in cancer.

[37]  M. Guida,et al.  TCGA molecular groups of endometrial cancer: Pooled data about prognosis. , 2019, Gynecologic oncology.

[38]  M. Stockler,et al.  Updated results of activity of durvalumab in advanced endometrial cancer (AEC) according to mismatch repair (MMR) status: The phase II PHAEDRA trial (ANZGOG1601) , 2019, Annals of Oncology.

[39]  H. Putter,et al.  Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): patterns of recurrence and post-hoc survival analysis of a randomised phase 3 trial , 2019, The Lancet. Oncology.

[40]  S. Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma applied to endometrial biopsy specimens: Towards early personalized patient management. , 2019, Gynecologic oncology.

[41]  J. McAlpine,et al.  Mismatch repair deficiency as a predictive marker for response to adjuvant radiotherapy in endometrial cancer. , 2019, Gynecologic oncology.

[42]  W. E. Richards,et al.  Adjuvant Chemotherapy plus Radiation for Locally Advanced Endometrial Cancer. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[43]  L. Massuger,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Biomarkers for Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Endometrial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2019, The oncologist.

[44]  B. Weigelt,et al.  Clinical outcomes of patients with POLE mutated endometrioid endometrial cancer. , 2019, Gynecologic oncology.

[45]  C. Høgdall,et al.  Lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI) as a strong and independent predictor for non-locoregional recurrences in endometrial cancer: a Danish Gynecological Cancer Group Study , 2019, Journal of gynecologic oncology.

[46]  Jae-Weon Kim,et al.  Phase III Trial: Adjuvant Pelvic Radiation Therapy Versus Vaginal Brachytherapy Plus Paclitaxel/Carboplatin in High-Intermediate and High-Risk Early Stage Endometrial Cancer. , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[47]  M. Köbel,et al.  Interpretation of P53 Immunohistochemistry in Endometrial Carcinomas: Toward Increased Reproducibility , 2018, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[48]  B. Job,et al.  Frequent Homologous Recombination Deficiency in High-grade Endometrial Carcinomas , 2018, Clinical Cancer Research.

[49]  A. Talhouk,et al.  L1CAM further stratifies endometrial carcinoma patients with no specific molecular risk profile , 2018, British Journal of Cancer.

[50]  P. Pollock,et al.  Refinement of high-risk endometrial cancer classification using DNA damage response biomarkers: a TransPORTEC initiative , 2018, Modern Pathology.

[51]  M. Köbel,et al.  Letter in response to: McAlpine J, Leon‐Castillo A, Bosse T. The rise of a novel classification system for endometrial carcinoma; integration of molecular subclasses. J Pathol 2018; 244: 538–549 , 2018, The Journal of pathology.

[52]  A. Talhouk,et al.  Final validation of the ProMisE molecular classifier for endometrial carcinoma in a large population-based case series , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[53]  T. Enomoto,et al.  Significance of abnormal peritoneal cytology on survival of women with stage I-II endometrioid endometrial cancer. , 2018, Gynecologic oncology.

[54]  C. Gilks,et al.  Molecular Classification of Grade 3 Endometrioid Endometrial Cancers Identifies Distinct Prognostic Subgroups , 2018, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[55]  J. McAlpine,et al.  The rise of a novel classification system for endometrial carcinoma; integration of molecular subclasses , 2018, The Journal of pathology.

[56]  A. Secord,et al.  Randomized Phase II Trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel Versus Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Trastuzumab in Uterine Serous Carcinomas That Overexpress Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2/neu. , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[57]  Jing Cai,et al.  Survival benefits of pelvic lymphadenectomy versus pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer , 2018, Medicine.

[58]  B. Seagle,et al.  Prognosis and treatment of positive peritoneal cytology in early endometrial cancer: matched cohort analyses from the National Cancer Database , 2017, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[59]  J. Kelley,et al.  Prognostic Significance of omental Disease and the Role of Omental Sampling in Patients With Uterine Carcinosarcoma , 2017, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[60]  A. Bryant,et al.  Lymphadenectomy for the management of endometrial cancer. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[61]  I. Nagtegaal,et al.  Accuracy of Endometrial Sampling in Endometrial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2017, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[62]  Samuel Leung,et al.  Evaluation of endometrial carcinoma prognostic immunohistochemistry markers in the context of molecular classification , 2017, The journal of pathology. Clinical research.

[63]  P. Pollock,et al.  Markers of the p53 pathway further refine molecular profiling in high-risk endometrial cancer: A TransPORTEC initiative. , 2017, Gynecologic oncology.

[64]  G. Mills,et al.  CTNNB1 (beta-catenin) mutation identifies low grade, early stage endometrial cancer patients at increased risk of recurrence , 2017, Modern Pathology.

[65]  A. Talhouk,et al.  Interobserver Agreement in Endometrial Carcinoma Histotype Diagnosis Varies Depending on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-based Molecular Subgroup , 2017, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[66]  X. Sun,et al.  Detection of circulating tumour cells may add value in endometrial cancer management. , 2016, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[67]  D. Tritchler,et al.  Clinicopathologic Significance of Mismatch Repair Defects in Endometrial Cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[68]  H. Putter,et al.  Toxicity and quality of life after adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[69]  D. Timmerman,et al.  Evaluation of models to predict lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer: A multicentre study. , 2016, European journal of cancer.

[70]  H. Salvesen,et al.  High Diagnostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Endometrial Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[71]  H. Putter,et al.  Improved Risk Assessment by Integrating Molecular and Clinicopathological Factors in Early-stage Endometrial Cancer—Combined Analysis of the PORTEC Cohorts , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[72]  S. Bendifallah,et al.  Predictive Modeling: A New Paradigm for Managing Endometrial Cancer , 2016, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[73]  Elena Pereira,et al.  Personalized Circulating Tumor DNA Biomarkers Dynamically Predict Treatment Response and Survival In Gynecologic Cancers , 2015, PloS one.

[74]  G. Botti,et al.  Assessment of high-sensitive methods for the detection of EGFR mutations in circulating free tumor DNA from NSCLC patients. , 2015, Pharmacogenomics.

[75]  A. Talhouk,et al.  A clinically applicable molecular-based classification for endometrial cancers , 2015, British Journal of Cancer.

[76]  A. Viale,et al.  Massively Parallel Sequencing-Based Clonality Analysis of Synchronous Endometrioid Endometrial and Ovarian Carcinomas. , 2015, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[77]  A. Talhouk,et al.  Detection of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiencies by immunohistochemistry can effectively diagnose the microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype in endometrial carcinomas. , 2015, Gynecologic oncology.

[78]  P. Schwartz,et al.  Microscopic Omental Metastasis in Clinical Stage I Endometrial Cancer: A Meta-analysis , 2015, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[79]  Minetta C. Liu,et al.  Detection of circulating tumor cells in high-risk endometrial cancer. , 2015, Anticancer research.

[80]  H. Chung,et al.  Peritoneal cytology: a risk factor of recurrence for non-endometrioid endometrial cancer. , 2014, Gynecologic oncology.

[81]  B. Weigelt,et al.  Classification of endometrial carcinoma: more than two types. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[82]  Ulla-Maija Haltia,et al.  FIGO 1988 versus 2009 staging for endometrial carcinoma: a comparative study on prediction of survival and stage distribution according to histologic subtype , 2014, Journal of gynecologic oncology.

[83]  J. Marcickiewicz,et al.  Hormone receptor loss in endometrial carcinoma curettage predicts lymph node metastasis and poor outcome in prospective multicentre trial. , 2013, European journal of cancer.

[84]  A. Romano,et al.  Molecular profiling of circulating tumor cells links plasticity to the metastatic process in endometrial cancer , 2013, Molecular Cancer.

[85]  P. Altevogt,et al.  L1CAM in early-stage type I endometrial cancer: results of a large multicenter evaluation. , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[86]  C Blake Gilks,et al.  Poor Interobserver Reproducibility in the Diagnosis of High-grade Endometrial Carcinoma , 2013, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[87]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma , 2013, Nature.

[88]  N. Hacker,et al.  Data Set for Reporting of Endometrial Carcinomas: Recommendations From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) Between United Kingdom, United States, Canada, and Australasia , 2013, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[89]  E. Pirog,et al.  The Diagnosis of Endometrial Carcinomas With Clear Cells by Gynecologic Pathologists: An Assessment of Interobserver Variability and Associated Morphologic Features , 2012, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[90]  H. Chung,et al.  Preoperative identification of a low-risk group for lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer: a Korean gynecologic oncology group study. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[91]  R. Rouzier,et al.  Detection rate and diagnostic accuracy of sentinel-node biopsy in early stage endometrial cancer: a prospective multicentre study (SENTI-ENDO). , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[92]  R. Naumann The role of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer: was the ASTEC trial doomed by design and are we destined to repeat that mistake? , 2011, Gynecologic oncology.

[93]  P. Zola,et al.  Sequential adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in endometrial cancer--results from two randomised studies. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[94]  R. Bristow,et al.  Cytoreductive surgery for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis. , 2010, Gynecologic oncology.

[95]  T. Herzog,et al.  ASTEC lymphadenectomy and radiation therapy studies: are conclusions valid? , 2010, Gynecologic oncology.

[96]  P. Gehrig,et al.  Management of women with uterine papillary serous cancer: a Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) review. , 2009, Gynecologic oncology.

[97]  V. Torri,et al.  Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial. , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[98]  A. Olawaiye,et al.  Management of women with clear cell endometrial cancer: a Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) review. , 2009, Gynecologic oncology.

[99]  S. Pecorelli Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium , 2009 .

[100]  M. Parmar,et al.  Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study , 2009, The Lancet.

[101]  N. Eritja,et al.  Molecular pathology of endometrial carcinoma: practical aspects from the diagnostic and therapeutic viewpoints , 2008, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[102]  H. Watari,et al.  A validation study of a scoring system to estimate the risk of lymph node metastasis for patients with endometrial cancer for tailoring the indication of lymphadenectomy. , 2007, Gynecologic oncology.

[103]  A. Berchuck,et al.  Retrospective analysis of selective lymphadenectomy in apparent early-stage endometrial cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[104]  J. McAlpine,et al.  Upstaging based solely on positive peritoneal washing does not affect outcome in endometrial cancer , 2005, Modern Pathology.

[105]  S. Kalloger,et al.  Description of a Novel System for Grading of Endometrial Carcinoma and Comparison With Existing Grading Systems , 2005, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[106]  H. Verkooijen,et al.  Positive peritoneal cytology in early-stage endometrial cancer does not influence prognosis , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[107]  W. McCluggage,et al.  A Critical Appraisal of the Value of Immunohistochemistry in Diagnosis of Uterine Neoplasms , 2004, Advances in anatomic pathology.

[108]  W. van Putten,et al.  Prognostic significance and interobserver variability of histologic grading systems for endometrial carcinoma , 2004, Cancer.

[109]  R. Kurman,et al.  A Binary Architectural Grading System for Uterine Endometrial Endometrioid Carcinoma Has Superior Reproducibility Compared With FIGO Grading and Identifies Subsets of Advance-Stage Tumors With Favorable and Unfavorable Prognosis , 2000, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[110]  M. J. Webb,et al.  Low-risk corpus cancer: is lymphadenectomy or radiotherapy necessary? , 2000, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[111]  D. O'connor,et al.  An analysis of two versus three grades for endometrial carcinoma. , 1999, Gynecologic oncology.

[112]  J. Shepherd,et al.  FIGO staging of gynecologic cancer , 1999 .

[113]  J. V. Bokhman Two pathogenetic types of endometrial carcinoma. , 1983, Gynecologic oncology.

[114]  P. Disaia,et al.  Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: its metastatic lymph node potential. A preliminary report. , 1976, Gynecologic oncology.

[115]  J. Thigpen,et al.  Randomized phase III trial of whole-abdominal irradiation versus doxorubicin and cisplatin chemotherapy in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[116]  Hornor,et al.  Letter & Response. , 2000, Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners.

[117]  J. Shepherd,et al.  FIGO staging of gynecologic cancer. 1994-1997 FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. , 1999, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[118]  C. Holinka,et al.  Endometrial carcinoma: two diseases? , 1987, Cancer detection and prevention.

[119]  S. Leung,et al.  The cutoff for estrogen and progesterone receptor expression in endometrial cancer revisited: a European Network for Individualized Treatment of Endometrial Cancer collaboration study , 2022, Human Pathology.