Beekhuizen, KS, Davis, MD, Kolber, MJ, and Cheng, MSS. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of the hexagon agility test. J Strength Cond Res. 23(7):2167-2171, 2009-The purpose of this study was to examine the test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC95) of the hexagon test. The hexagon test is a routinely used measure of agility in the sports and rehabilitation professions, yet its reliability has not been investigated in prior research. A total of 26 college-aged men (n = 17) and women (n = 9) of various activity levels were recruited to participate in 3 testing sessions: baseline, 1 hour after baseline, and 48 hours after baseline. The results of this study indicated excellent test-retest reliability for both same-day intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) model 3,1 = 0.938 and between-day ICC (3,1) = 0.924 analyses. The MDC95 for the hexagon test was 1.015 seconds. A significant difference in the mean times was identified during the same-day test-retest sessions (p < 0.001) but not the between-day test-retest sessions (p = 0.18). The significant differences identified between the baseline and the same-day retest session suggests a learning effect. The hexagon test shows excellent reliability for measuring agility, which supports its use as a tool to assess athletic performance and lower-extremity agility. Evidence of reliability, in addition to its ease of administration, makes the hexagon test a practical and effective method to measure agility. When using this test as a measure of agility, a change of greater than 1.015 seconds is necessary to be 95% certain that the change in time reflects improvement and exceeds measurement error. A practice trial is recommended prior to recording scores to attenuate the possibility of a learning effect.
[1]
Ralph Rozenek,et al.
Reliability and Validity of the T‐Test as a Measure of Agility, Leg Power, and Leg Speed in College‐Aged Men and Women
,
2000
.
[2]
Nicola Phillips MSc Mcsp.
Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning
,
1997
.
[3]
Gladys E. Garrett,et al.
Performance Profiles of Nationally Ranked Junior Tennis Players
,
1992
.
[4]
E. P. Roetert,et al.
Establishing percentiles for junior tennis players based on physical fitness testing results.
,
1995,
Clinics in sports medicine.
[5]
M. Rosenstein,et al.
The effects of arms and countermovement on vertical jumping.
,
1990,
Medicine and science in sports and exercise.
[6]
J. Weir.
Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM.
,
2005,
Journal of strength and conditioning research.
[7]
J. Fowles,et al.
RELATIONSHIPS TO SKATING PERFORMANCE IN COMPETITIVE HOCKEY PLAYERS
,
2007,
Journal of strength and conditioning research.