Diffusion of disinformation: How social media users respond to fake news and why

This exploratory study seeks to understand the diffusion of disinformation by examining how social media users respond to fake news and why. Using a mixed-methods approach in an explanatory-sequential design, this study combines results from a national survey involving 2501 respondents with a series of in-depth interviews with 20 participants from the small but economically and technologically advanced nation of Singapore. This study finds that most social media users in Singapore just ignore the fake news posts they come across on social media. They would only offer corrections when the issue is strongly relevant to them and to people with whom they share a strong and close interpersonal relationship.

[1]  Edson C. Tandoc,et al.  Defining “Fake News” , 2018 .

[2]  V. Bakir,et al.  Fake News and The Economy of Emotions , 2018 .

[3]  A. Roets,et al.  ‘Fake news’: Incorrect, but hard to correct. The role of cognitive ability on the impact of false information on social impressions , 2017 .

[4]  Anita Whiting,et al.  Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications approach , 2013 .

[5]  B. Glaser.  The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis , 1965 .

[6]  L. Bode,et al.  See Something, Say Something: Correction of Global Health Misinformation on Social Media , 2018, Health communication.

[7]  L. Petersen,et al.  Preferences for and evaluation of self‐relevant information depending on the elaboration of the self‐schemata involved , 1999 .

[8]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Internet use in the contemporary media environment. , 2001 .

[9]  John Raacke,et al.  MySpace and Facebook: Applying the Uses and Gratifications Theory to Exploring Friend-Networking Sites , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[10]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Impression Management 2.0 , 2008, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..

[11]  Jinguang Zhang,et al.  Self-Enhancement on a Self-Categorization Leash: Evidence for a Dual-Process Model of First- and Third-Person Perceptions , 2010 .

[12]  Thomas E. Ruggiero.  Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century , 2000 .

[13]  Patti M. Valkenburg,et al.  Adolescents' comments in social media: Why do adolescents receive negative feedback and who is most at risk? , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  J. Walther.  The Merger of Mass and Interpersonal Communication via New Media: Integrating Metaconstructs , 2017 .

[15]  Edson C. Tandoc,et al.  Fake News as a Critical Incident in Journalism , 2018, Journalism Practice.

[16]  A. Maslow.  A Theory of Human Motivation , 1943 .

[17]  Hsiang Iris Chyi,et al.  News and the Overloaded Consumer: Factors Influencing Information Overload Among News Consumers , 2012, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[18]  Debbie Goh,et al.  Audiences’ acts of authentication in the age of fake news: A conceptual framework , 2018, New Media Soc..

[19]  Chris J Vargo,et al.  The agenda-setting power of fake news: A big data analysis of the online media landscape from 2014 to 2016 , 2018, New Media Soc..

[20]  Anabel Quan-Haase,et al.  Uses and Gratifications of Social Media: A Comparison of Facebook and Instant Messaging , 2010 .

[21]  Christopher J. Carpenter,et al.  Mediated Skewed Diffusion of Issues Information: A Theory , 2018, Social Media + Society.

[22]  Marcel Broersma,et al.  Repositioning news and public connection in everyday life: a user-oriented perspective on inclusiveness, engagement, relevance, and constructiveness , 2017 .

[23]  C. MacCann,et al.  Coolness as a trait and its relations to the Big Five, self-esteem, social desirability, and action orientation , 2018 .

[24]  J. Blumler.  The Role of Theory in Uses and Gratifications Studies , 1979 .

[25]  Ullrich K. H. Ecker,et al.  Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and coping with the post-truth era , 2017 .

[26]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  The science of fake news , 2018, Science.

[27]  Jonathan Mummolo,et al.  News from the Other Side: How Topic Relevance Limits the Prevalence of Partisan Selective Exposure , 2016, The Journal of Politics.

[28]  H. Heikkilä,et al.  FROM CREDIBILITY TO RELEVANCE , 2010 .

[29]  C OrbenAmy,et al.  Social media and relationship development , 2017 .

[30]  Rachel Young,et al.  Romantic motivations for social media use, social comparison, and online aggression among adolescents , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  Sun Kyong Lee,et al.  The effects of news consumption via social media and news information overload on perceptions of journalistic norms and practices , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  Robin Dunbar,et al.  Social media and relationship development: The effect of valence and intimacy of posts , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[33]  M. Gentzkow,et al.  Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election , 2017 .

[34]  Peiyu Pai,et al.  User adoption of social networking sites: Eliciting uses and gratifications through a means-end approach , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[35]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Cultivating Social Resources on Social Network Sites: Facebook Relationship Maintenance Behaviors and Their Role in Social Capital Processes , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..