Length of Sedimentation Reaction in Undiluted Blood (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate): Variations with Sex and Age and Reference Limits

Abstract Although the length of sedimentation reaction in blood (LSRB) (commonly, but improperly called erythrocyte sedimentation rate, ESR) has long been used in clinical laboratories because it is simple and low-cost, its sensitivity and specificity are unsatisfactory. Usually, the values are reported using the Westergren method with sodium citrate-anticoagulated specimens. We used a new procedure, the Test1™, which measures the length of sedimentation reaction in undiluted K3EDTA anticoagulated blood samples following ICSH (International Committee for Standardization in Haematology) recommendations. Samples obtained from 840 reference individuals (430 females and 410 males, mean age 44 and 46.5 years respectively, range 1 to 90 years) were utilised to estimate the reference limits. The subjects, classified by sex, were subdivided into four statistically different age groups to determine the reference limits (2.5th and 97.5th percentiles). Sex difference was statistically significant in two age groups, from 14 to 50 (p<0.0001) and from 50 to 70 years (p<0.01). We did not observe significant sex difference within the age bracket from 1 to 14 years and from 70 to 90 years. In both sexes LSRB values increased with age, in significant correlation with fibrinogen concentration (p<0.0001), and became significantly higher in subjects older than 70 compared to all the younger subjects (p<0.01 in females and p<0.02 in males). Thus, we defined adequate reference ranges in elderly.

[1]  M. Brigden,et al.  Problems in Interpreting Laboratory Tests: What do Unexpected Results Mean? , 2000, Postgraduate medicine.

[2]  M. Wener,et al.  Utility of Laboratory Testing in Autoimmune Inner Ear Disease , 1999, The Laryngoscope.

[3]  H. Paulus,et al.  Equivalence of the acute phase reactants C-reactive protein, plasma viscosity, and Westergren erythrocyte sedimentation rate when used to calculate American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria or the Disease Activity Score in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Western Consortium , 1999, The Journal of rheumatology.

[4]  D. Gladman,et al.  Progression in psoriatic arthritis: role of time varying clinical indicators. , 1999, The Journal of rheumatology.

[5]  D. Giavarina,et al.  Method comparison of automated systems for the erythrocyte sedimentation rate. , 1999, American journal of clinical pathology.

[6]  M. Suarez‐Almazor,et al.  Utilization and predictive value of laboratory tests in patients referred to rheumatologists by primary care physicians. , 1998, The Journal of rheumatology.

[7]  M. Plebani,et al.  The TEST 1 automated system: a new method for measuring the erythrocyte sedimentation rate. , 1998, American journal of clinical pathology.

[8]  H. E. Solberg,et al.  Population‐based erythrocyte sedimentation rates in 3910 subjectively healthy Norwegian adults. A statistical study based on men and women from the Oslo area , 1996, Journal of internal medicine.

[9]  R. Tallis,et al.  Persistent grossly elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate in elderly people: one year follow-up of morbidity and mortality. , 1995, Gerontology.

[10]  A. Weinstein,et al.  The erythrocyte sedimentation rate--time honored and tradition bound. , 1994, The Journal of rheumatology.

[11]  J. Stuart,et al.  Effect of patient age on tests of the acute-phase response. , 1993, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[12]  L. Böttiger,et al.  Normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate and age. , 1967, British medical journal.