Reconciling Consistency and Contrast in Sequential Choices

Most choices follow other choices and decisions. However, there is little consensus on when an initial task leads to consistency versus contrast in subsequent decisions. The present research offers a framework based on highlighting vs. balancing mindsets to understand how a prior task guides subsequent behavior. We propose that when an initial task activates a self-concept it leads to a highlighting mindset, which subsequently guides consistent behavior. However, when an initial task activates a self-concept and establishes credentials for it, it leads to a balancing mindset that causes subsequent choices to contrast from the initial ones.

[1]  R. Dhar,et al.  Making Complementary Choices in Consumption Episodes: Highlighting versus Balancing: , 1999 .

[2]  Alexander Chernev,et al.  Goal Orientation and Consumer Preference for the Status Quo , 2004 .

[3]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  Do Messages about Health Risks Threaten the Self? Increasing the Acceptance of Threatening Health Messages Via Self-Affirmation , 2000 .

[4]  R. Petty,et al.  The effects of stereotype activation on behavior: a review of possible mechanisms. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[6]  J. Bargh,et al.  The perception–behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. , 2001 .

[7]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Procedurally mediated social inferences: The case of category accessibility effects , 1987 .

[8]  E. Higgins Promotion and Prevention: Regulatory Focus as A Motivational Principle , 1998 .

[9]  C. Steele The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self , 1988 .

[10]  A. Drolet Inherent rule variability in consumer choice: Changing rules for change's sake , 2002 .

[11]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  AN Hrabi,et al.  A Measure of Arousal Seeking Tendency , 1973 .

[13]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  Licensing Effect in Consumer Choice , 2006 .

[14]  S. Christian Wheeler,et al.  Circles, Squares, and Choice: The Effect of Shape Arrays on Uniqueness and Variety Seeking , 2008 .

[15]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  The debiasing effect of counterfactual mind-sets: Increasing the search for disconfirmatory information in group decisions , 2003 .

[16]  Gabriele Oettingen,et al.  Implementation Intentions , 2019, Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine.

[17]  Itamar Simonson,et al.  The Role of Explanations and Need for Uniqueness in Consumer Decision Making: Unconventional Choices Based on Reasons , 2000 .

[18]  Vicki G. Morwitz,et al.  Effects of Participative Pricing on Consumers' Cognitions and Actions: A Goal Theoretic Perspective , 2005 .

[19]  Kai Sassenberg,et al.  Don't stereotype, think different! Overcoming automatic stereotype activation by mindset priming , 2005 .

[20]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.