Eph Receptors and Ephrins in the Developing Chick Cerebellum: Relationship to Sagittal Patterning and Granule Cell Migration

Spatiotemporal expression patterns of six members of the Eph gene family (EphA4, EphA3, EphB2, ephrin-B1, ephrin-A2, and ephrin-A5) were characterized immunocytochemically at various stages of chick cerebellar development. EphA4 expression is observed in the cerebellar anlage as early as embryonic day 5 (E5) and continues in the posthatch cerebellum. During the early period of cerebellar development (E3–E8), complementarity is observed between EphA4 and ephrin-A5 expression within the cerebellar-isthmal region. By E8, differential expression of EphA4 in parasagittal Purkinje cell bands is evident, and the expression remains banded in the posthatch cerebellum. Banded expression of the ephrin-A5 ligand complements EphA4 expression during the middle period (E9–E15). During this period, ephrin-A2 and EphA3 are coexpressed in a banded pattern and with variable correlation to EphA4. Variability in the banding expression is observed for EphA4, EphA3, ephrin-A5, and ephrin-A2 across different lobes, and graded complementarity in the expression pattern of EphA3 and ephrin-A5 is observed in the external granular layer between the posterior and anterior lobes. Analysis of Purkinje cell birth date in correlation with Eph–ephrin expression during the middle period reveals that early-born cells express EphA4, whereas late-born cells express ephrin-A5. Finally, EphA4 expression domains are respected by migrating granule cell ribbons, which express both ephrin-B1 and EphB2. These expression patterns suggest multiple roles for the Eph–ephrin system in cerebellar development, including demarcation/enforcement of boundaries of the cerebellar anlage, formation/maintenance of Purkinje cell compartments, and restriction of the early phase of granule cell migration to ribbons.

[1]  E. Pasquale,et al.  Eph receptors and ephrins demarcate cerebellar lobules before and during their formation , 1999, Mechanisms of Development.

[2]  H. Feirabend.  Development of longitudinal patterns in the cerebellum of the chicken (Gallus domesticus): a cytoarchitectural study on the genesis of cerebellar modules. , 1990, European journal of morphology.

[3]  Luis Puelles,et al.  Atlas of prenatal rat brain development , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[4]  A. Joyner,et al.  Abnormal embryonic cerebellar development and patterning of postnatal foliation in two mouse Engrailed-2 mutants. , 1994, Development.

[5]  E. Pasquale,et al.  Characterization of the expression of the Cek8 receptor-type tyrosine kinase during development and in tumor cell lines. , 1994, Oncogene.

[6]  T. Pawson,et al.  Bidirectional signalling through the EPH-family receptor Nuk and its transmembrane ligands , 1996, Nature.

[7]  E. Pasquale,et al.  Expression and tyrosine phosphorylation of Eph receptors suggest multiple mechanisms in patterning of the visual system. , 1998, Developmental biology.

[8]  C. Cepko,et al.  Biphasic dispersion of clones containing Purkinje cells and glia in the developing chick cerebellum. , 1999, Developmental biology.

[9]  C. Cepko,et al.  Granule Cell Raphes and Parasagittal Domains of Purkinje Cells: Complementary Patterns in the Developing Chick Cerebellum , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  E. Pasquale,et al.  Polarized expression of the receptor protein tyrosine kinase Cek5 in the developing avian visual system. , 1995, Developmental biology.

[11]  M. Glickstein,et al.  The anatomy of the cerebellum , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[12]  E. Pasquale,et al.  The Eph family of receptors. , 1997, Current opinion in cell biology.

[13]  Viktor Hamburger,et al.  A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo , 1992, Journal of morphology.

[14]  E. Pasquale,et al.  Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Transmembrane Ligands for Eph Receptors , 1997, Science.

[15]  J G Flanagan,et al.  The ephrins and Eph receptors in neural development. , 1998, Annual review of neuroscience.

[16]  R. Hawkes,et al.  The development of molecular compartmentation in the cerebellar cortex. , 1994, Acta anatomica.

[17]  C. Sotelo,et al.  Chick/quail chimeras with partial cerebellar grafts: An analysis of the origin and migration of cerebellar cells , 1993, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[18]  A. Lane,et al.  Eph receptors discriminate specific ligand oligomers to determine alternative signaling complexes, attachment, and assembly responses. , 1998, Genes & development.

[19]  C. Cepko,et al.  Migration patterns of clonally related granule cells and their progenitors in the developing chick cerebellum , 1994, Neuron.

[20]  A. Barrios,et al.  Eph signaling is required for segmentation and differentiation of the somites. , 1998, Genes & development.

[21]  R. Hawkes,et al.  Pattern formation in the cerebellum of murine embryonic stem cell chimeras , 1998, The European journal of neuroscience.

[22]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Identification and cloning of ELF-1, a developmentally expressed ligand for the Mek4 and Sek receptor tyrosine kinases , 1994, Cell.

[23]  Mark Ellisman,et al.  Immunolocalization of the receptor tyrosine kinase EphA4 in the adult rat central nervous system , 1997, Brain Research.

[24]  Renping Zhou.  Regulation of topographic projection by the Eph family receptor Bsk (EphA5) and its ligands , 1997, Cell and Tissue Research.

[25]  J. Voogd,et al.  A 3H-thymidine autoradiographic study of the development of the cerebellum of the White Leghorn (Gallus domesticus): "evidence for longitudinal neuroblast generation patterns". , 1985, Acta morphologica Neerlando-Scandinavica.

[26]  T. Deerinck,et al.  Cek5, a membrane receptor-type tyrosine kinase, is in neurons of the embryonic and postnatal avian brain , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  M. Barbacid,et al.  Genetic analysis of the role of Eph receptors in the development of the mammalian nervous system , 1997, Cell and Tissue Research.

[28]  M. Hatten,et al.  The role of the rhombic lip in avian cerebellum development. , 1999, Development.

[29]  R. Hawkes,et al.  Transverse zones in the vermis of the mouse cerebellum , 1999, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[30]  Franco Weth,et al.  Modulation of EphA Receptor Function by Coexpressed EphrinA Ligands on Retinal Ganglion Cell Axons , 1999, Neuron.

[31]  D. Wilkinson,et al.  Function of the Eph-related kinase rtk1 in patterning of the zebrafish forebrain , 1996, Nature.

[32]  C. Redies,et al.  Development of cadherin‐Defined parasagittal subdivisions in the embryonic chicken cerebellum , 1998, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[33]  Feirabend Hk.  Development of longitudinal patterns in the cerebellum of the chicken (Gallus domesticus): a cytoarchitectural study on the genesis of cerebellar modules. , 1990 .

[34]  Uwe Drescher,et al.  Rostral optic tectum acquires caudal characteristics following ectopic Engrailed expression , 1996, Current Biology.

[35]  S. Nakagawa,et al.  Cadherin-Defined Segments and Parasagittal Cell Ribbons in the Developing Chicken Cerebellum , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience.

[36]  C. Sotelo,et al.  BEN As a Presumptive Target Recognition Molecule during the Development of the Olivocerebellar System , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  Qiling Xu,et al.  Eph receptors and ephrins restrict cell intermingling and communication , 1999, Nature.

[38]  T. Pawson,et al.  Nuk Controls Pathfinding of Commissural Axons in the Mammalian Central Nervous System , 1996, Cell.

[39]  S. Wilson,et al.  Anteroposterior patterning is required within segments for somite boundary formation in developing zebrafish. , 2000, Development.

[40]  K. Herrup,et al.  The compartmentalization of the cerebellum. , 1997, Annual review of neuroscience.

[41]  D. Wilkinson,et al.  Expression of truncated Sek-1 receptor tyrosine kinase disrupts the segmental restriction of gene expression in the Xenopus and zebrafish hindbrain. , 1995, Development.

[42]  D. Wilkinson,et al.  In vivo cell sorting in complementary segmental domains mediated by Eph receptors and ephrins , 1999, Nature.

[43]  Karl Schilling,et al.  From zebra stripes to postal zones: deciphering patterns of gene expression in the cerebellum , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[44]  S L Baader,et al.  Selective Disruption of “Late Onset” Sagittal Banding Patterns by Ectopic Expression of Engrailed-2 in Cerebellar Purkinje Cells , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  S. Millet,et al.  Expression of the Homeobox‐containing Gene En‐2 During the Development of the Chick Central Nervous System , 1995, The European journal of neuroscience.

[46]  A. Flenniken,et al.  Eph Receptors and Ligands Comprise Two Major Specificity Subclasses and Are Reciprocally Compartmentalized during Embryogenesis , 1996, Neuron.

[47]  B. Rosengarten,et al.  Purkinje cell lineage and the topographic organization of the cerebellar cortex: a view from X inactivation mosaics. , 1996, Developmental Biology.

[48]  E. Pasquale.  Identification of chicken embryo kinase 5, a developmentally regulated receptor-type tyrosine kinase of the Eph family. , 1991, Cell regulation.

[49]  Jürgen Löschinger,et al.  Shared and distinct functions of RAGS and ELF‐1 in guiding retinal axons , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[50]  L. Puelles,et al.  Retrospective clonal analysis of the cerebellum using genetic laacZ/lacZ mouse mosaics. , 1997, Development.