Comparison of DNA Extraction Protocols for Molecular Identification of Root Knot Nematode (Meloidogyne Spp.) Using Egg Masses

There is a dire need of alternative reliable and non-laborious methods with high resolution for identification of the root-knot nematodes at the species level where molecular techniques have shown the potentials. This study assessed four DNA extraction protocols, (i.e. TNES buffer method, Modified CTAB method, Phenol / Chloroform Method and 1% SDS method) to extract DNA from egg masses of root knot nematodes. Egg masses were collected from pure cultures of nematodes maintained in tomato cultivation under net house condition. After extraction of genomic DNA, Polymerase Chain Reaction was performed to determine the success of the method of DNA extraction. The 1% SDS method with incubation at -20 0C for 1hr and incubated at 65 0C for 1 hr and again incubated for 95 0C for 10 min, was a better method to result in intense PCR bands of the expected sizes (720 bp and 999 bp) when amplified by Meloidogyne genus and Meloidogyne incognita specific primers. This DNA extraction procedure could contribute as an effective method to molecular identification of species and other downstream applications of population studies of root knot nematodes.

[1]  M. Christoforou,et al.  Molecular Diagnostic Tools for Nematodes , 2017 .

[2]  J. López-Guerrero,et al.  DNA Source Selection for Downstream Applications Based on DNA Quality Indicators Analysis , 2016, Biopreservation and biobanking.

[3]  E. Zavaleta-Mejía,et al.  Presence of Meloidogyne enterolobii on Jalapeño pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) in Sinaloa, Mexico , 2016 .

[4]  R. Berbara,et al.  Extracting DNA of nematodes communities from Argentine Pampas agricultural soils. , 2015, Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias.

[5]  S. M. Seyedmehdi,et al.  Qualification Study of Two Genomic DNA Extraction Methods in Different Clinical Samples , 2014, Tanaffos.

[6]  C. Khanal Identification of Root-knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) of Arkansas using Molecular Diagnostics , 2014 .

[7]  L. Haupt,et al.  Comparison of genomic DNA extraction techniques from whole blood samples: a time, cost and quality evaluation study , 2012, Molecular Biology Reports.

[8]  Hiromichi Sakai A DNA extraction method with SDS from single nematodes for direct application to PCR amplification , 2010 .

[9]  酒井 啓充 A DNA extraction method with SDS from single nematodes for direct application to PCR amplification , 2010 .

[10]  B. Griffiths,et al.  DNA extraction from soil nematodes for multi-sample community studies , 2008 .

[11]  V. Blok,et al.  Molecular diagnostic key for identification of single juveniles of seven common and economically important species of root‐knot nematode (Meloidogyne spp.) , 2007 .

[12]  V. Williamson,et al.  Sensitive PCR Detection of Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita, and M. javanica Extracted from Soil. , 2006, Journal of nematology.

[13]  R. Santella Approaches to DNA/RNA Extraction and Whole Genome Amplification , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[14]  D. W. Dickson,et al.  Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Meloidogyne mayaguensis Isolates from Florida. , 2004, Journal of nematology.

[15]  Xu Jian-hua PCR Assays for Rapid and Sensitive Identification of Three Major Root-Knot Nematodes, Meloidogyne incognita, M. javanica and M. arenaria , 2004 .

[16]  M. Moens,et al.  Molecular characterisation of 18 Pratylenchus species using rDNA Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism , 2000 .

[17]  V. Blok,et al.  Comparison of Sequences from the Ribosomal DNA Intergenic Region of Meloidogyne mayaguensis and Other Major Tropical Root-Knot Nematodes. , 1997, Journal of nematology.

[18]  Y. Spiegel,et al.  Glycoprotein Characterization of the Gelatinous Matrix in the Root-knot Nematode Meloidogyne javanica. , 1993, Journal of nematology.

[19]  G. Cliff,et al.  Evaluation of Morphological Variability in Meloidogyne arenaria. , 1985, Journal of nematology.