Size Comparisons among Integral Membrane Transport Protein Homologues in Bacteria, Archaea, and Eucarya

ABSTRACT Integral membrane proteins from over 20 ubiquitous families of channels, secondary carriers, and primary active transporters were analyzed for average size differences between homologues from the three domains of life: Bacteria, Archaea, andEucarya. The results showed that while eucaryotic homologues are consistently larger than their bacterial counterparts, archaeal homologues are significantly smaller. These size differences proved to be due primarily to variations in the sizes of hydrophilic domains localized to the N termini, the C termini, or specific loops between transmembrane α-helical spanners, depending on the family. Within the Eucarya domain, plant homologues proved to be substantially smaller than their animal and fungal counterparts. By contrast, extracytoplasmic receptors of ABC-type uptake systems inArchaea proved to be larger on average than those of their bacterial homologues, while cytoplasmic enzymes from different organisms exhibited little or no significant size differences. These observations presumably reflect evolutionary pressure and molecular mechanisms that must have been operative since these groups of organisms diverged from each other.

[1]  I. West,et al.  Ligand conduction and the gated-pore mechanism of transmembrane transport. , 1997, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[2]  I. Paulsen,et al.  New Glycoprotein-Associated Amino Acid Transporters , 1999, The Journal of Membrane Biology.

[3]  Kay Hofmann,et al.  Tmbase-A database of membrane spanning protein segments , 1993 .

[4]  Tomas A. Prolla,et al.  Destabilization of tracts of simple repetitive DNA in yeast by mutations affecting DNA mismatch repair , 1993, Nature.

[5]  M. Saier,et al.  Involvement of the central loop of the lactose permease of Escherichia coli in its allosteric regulation by the glucose-specific enzyme IIA of the phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system , 1996, Journal of bacteriology.

[6]  S. Ehrlich,et al.  The role of SOS and flap processing in microsatellite instability in Escherichia coli. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  H. Kaback,et al.  From membrane to molecule to the third amino acid from the left with a membrane transport protein , 1997, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[8]  B. Persson,et al.  Phosphate permeases of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: structure, function and regulation. , 1999, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[9]  B. Nilius,et al.  Functional characterization of the CFTR R domain using CFTR/MDR1 hybrid and deletion constructs. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[10]  E. Wright,et al.  Intestinal brush border membrane Na+/glucose cotransporter functions in situ as a homotetramer. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  M. Saier,et al.  Molecular phylogeny as a basis for the classification of transport proteins from bacteria, archaea and eukarya. , 1998, Advances in microbial physiology.

[12]  M. Saier A Functional-Phylogenetic Classification System for Transmembrane Solute Transporters , 2000, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[13]  G. Gutman,et al.  Slipped-strand mispairing: a major mechanism for DNA sequence evolution. , 1987, Molecular biology and evolution.

[14]  T. Petes,et al.  Instability of simple sequence DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1992, Molecular and cellular biology.

[15]  M. Saier Genome archeology leading to the characterization and classification of transport proteins. , 1999, Current opinion in microbiology.

[16]  J. Thompson,et al.  The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.